Dual 950 Pro RAID 0 Storage Workflow Setup

mapkos13

Reputable
Dec 22, 2015
20
0
4,520
Hey guys I was hoping some of you could chime in with some input on how I should move forward with my storage solutions.

I am a photographer that does light video (3 minute promos and only one a month...maybe) Most workflow is on large RAW files around 42 MP's standalone and then over 2+ GB files sizes when layered in Photoshop. Use Lightroom, and Premier Pro.

I am looking to create the best workflow with speed making sure I have some backup and room for a fast access scratch disk. SO here's what I have to play with.

System is an64 bit WIndows 10 built on an Asus Z170 Deluxe with the i7 6700k 4.0 (not overclocked), MSI GTX970 4G and 32 GB DDR4 2667(Maybe I should upgrade to faster RAM or 64 GB?


I currently am running for storage:

Samsung 950 Pro NVMe- 512GB as the main drive and then a couple 4 TB internals.

What I need some input on now is the recommendations on how I should configure the following. (I'm including the 950 above)

2x Samsung 950's 512 GB each
2x WD Black 4TB each
1x Samsung 850 SSD 1 TB
2x G-Drive External 4TB @ 7200
1x QNAP NAS 8TB (2x4tb)

** I also have a Asus Thunderbolt EX 3 Expansion card that I haven't un-boxed but also don't have drives for that though.

My initial thoughts were:

Main Boot- Samsung 950

Raid 0- WD Blacks as working drive

Scratch Disk- Samsung 850 or 950

Full Drive Backup- QNAP

Other option is two Raid the 950's

I'd appreciate the feedback. I've read mixed reviews about the need to Raid 0 the 950's as Intel didn't have a better controller vs. Samsung's and therefore the speed increase was reduced. Also, what should I use as a working drive vs. the boot and program drives, etc.

I know this is a mouthful but I'm quite sure there's a lot of you that already had the answer before you got this far!

I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR HELP...


 
Solution
The individual 950's, or pretty much any SSD, is faster than 2 x HDD in RAID 0.

Yes...use the second 950 as your working drive for images. Write to the backup later.

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator
I don't know if you've seen this, but:

2 x 950 Pro NVMe in RAID 0
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/samsung-950-pro-256gb-raid-report,4449.html

It can actually be a little bit slower than running singly.

Your "initial thoughts" is probably what I would go with.

My current setup:
500GB 850 EVO - OS and applications
250GB 840 EVO - photo work
250GB 840 EVO - video and 3D CAD work
960GB Sandisk Ultra II - games, VM's, Lightroom and PSP cache, and 'all those other files'
3TB WD Green - backups

Other PC on the LAN (~20TB drive space) gets backups from this whole conglomeration.
 

mapkos13

Reputable
Dec 22, 2015
20
0
4,520
Saw it and it's interesting. Short of the real world test it seems to be on the top end all the way around. Not sure what the downside would be?

Right now I have one of the 950's setup as the main drive. One is setup as the scratch disk for PS and I've got the two WD's setup in RAID 0 but I'm thinking that if I'm writing to them I'm negating any benefit of the 950's. Maybe I'll have to revise a bit and write all photography related files to the scratch and them have them offload to backup nightly when I'm not sitting in front of it waiting.

Standalone if you're interested:


Write Read

Desktop 950 1541.3 2606.2

Scratch 950 1552.4 2606.2

WD Blacks 402.4 414.8