So here is the thing. If i compare an i7 2600 vs i5 6500, on paper the i7 is faster than the new i5.
http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=639&pid2=2326&compare=Intel%20Core%20i7-2600%204-Core%203.40GHz-vs-Intel%20Core%20i5-6500%203.2GHz
It says that i7 is almost 7% better in performance than the new i5. But thats performance on paper. My question is that will the new i5 perform better than the i7 2600 in newer games like Watch Dogs 2 or Battlefield 1? I am currently using the i7 2600 3.4ghz with my gtx 1060 3gb and it bottlenecks like hell... Watch Dogs 2 gives 30 fps. Changing graphics settings or resolution doesnt affect the performance either. (Thats a bottleneck right?).
http://www.game-debate.com/cpu/index.php?pid=639&pid2=2326&compare=Intel%20Core%20i7-2600%204-Core%203.40GHz-vs-Intel%20Core%20i5-6500%203.2GHz
It says that i7 is almost 7% better in performance than the new i5. But thats performance on paper. My question is that will the new i5 perform better than the i7 2600 in newer games like Watch Dogs 2 or Battlefield 1? I am currently using the i7 2600 3.4ghz with my gtx 1060 3gb and it bottlenecks like hell... Watch Dogs 2 gives 30 fps. Changing graphics settings or resolution doesnt affect the performance either. (Thats a bottleneck right?).