i3-6100 + 1050 Ti; Good processor or needs more beef?

Solution
I scored an 1155 ITX board on eBay a while ago by buying an ITX barebones and selling the parts I didn't want. You're not going to find any new 1155 boards.

Be aware that the i5 2400 is a 95w TDP CPU. I doubt it actually draws 95w (TDP is mostly cooler related, but it's definitely going to be more power hungry than a newer 22nm or 14nm chip.

Some interesting bits:
i5 2400 - quad core, 3.4ghz turbo, 95w TDP
i5 7600T - quad core, 3.7ghz turbo, 35w TDP
Pentium G4640 - 3.5ghz 2c/4t, 54w
i3 6100 - 2c/4t 3.7ghz, 51w TDP
i3 6300 - 2c/4t 3.9ghz, 65w TDP
i3 7120 - 2c/4t 4.1ghz, 51w TDP

TDP does not equal power consumption exactly. Often a whole series of CPUs will have the same TDP rating, which just means they can be used with the same...
I probably wouldn't consider the 6100 anymore. The Pentium G4560 is basically the same CPU only with AVX instructions disabled - it's a 3.5ghz 2c/4t Skylake CPU, and it's about $40-50 cheaper. Or, you might consider the i3 7100 which is the same price but 200mhz faster with slightly lower power draw.

EDIT: You don't need the aftermarket cooler. The C7 is actually only marginally better than Intel's stock cooler, as they're about the same size. Save yourself the $40, or maybe get something like an i5 7400T with the money saved?
 
It is new. You'd need to make sure you get a board with an updated BIOS, old stock may not be updated to support it yet, or go with a B250/H270 board which would be guaranteed to support it. These new chipsets will also support Intel's "Optane" technology, which should be orders of magnitude faster than any existing solid state drives when it hits the market.
 
Aug 5, 2015
159
0
4,710
Unless Optane drives get bigger, I'll have to pass. Aside from the M.2 SSD, I plan to have NO internal 2.5 or 3.5 devices to cache from. I think I'll leave it alone. On a different note, you think the Pentium can keep up with the 1050 Ti, or should I try a low power i5?
 
GPU and CPU load are largely independent of one another. Either a CPU can deliver the frames you want in the games you play, or it can't.

I'll make up a scenario: Let's say in Battlefield One the Pentium will average 55fps and dip down to 40 in intensive areas, whereas an i5 will average 65fps and dip down to 55. It doesn't matter whether you pair a GTX 1050 or 1080 with either CPU, it's not going to change how many frames the CPU can deliver and you'll never get above 55fps averages with the Pentium. With a GPU you can always lower graphical settings to increase framerate, but with a CPU, you get what you get.

EDIT: My opinion, CPUs are lasting longer and longer, because the rate of improvement has slowed. My 4 year old i5 is still plenty for my needs, and any CPU you buy today may last even longer. GPUs on the other hand are replaced far more quickly, so it makes more sense to me to spend more on the component that's not going to be outdated as soon.
 
Aug 5, 2015
159
0
4,710
Well, now that you mention it, I do have an i5-2400. I salvaged it from a Point Of Sale system a company was throwing out. I was expecting to find a Pentium or something, but there it was. Problem is, I can't find any M-ITX mobos for it. Any ideas?
 
I scored an 1155 ITX board on eBay a while ago by buying an ITX barebones and selling the parts I didn't want. You're not going to find any new 1155 boards.

Be aware that the i5 2400 is a 95w TDP CPU. I doubt it actually draws 95w (TDP is mostly cooler related, but it's definitely going to be more power hungry than a newer 22nm or 14nm chip.

Some interesting bits:
i5 2400 - quad core, 3.4ghz turbo, 95w TDP
i5 7600T - quad core, 3.7ghz turbo, 35w TDP
Pentium G4640 - 3.5ghz 2c/4t, 54w
i3 6100 - 2c/4t 3.7ghz, 51w TDP
i3 6300 - 2c/4t 3.9ghz, 65w TDP
i3 7120 - 2c/4t 4.1ghz, 51w TDP

TDP does not equal power consumption exactly. Often a whole series of CPUs will have the same TDP rating, which just means they can be used with the same cooler, but some will draw less power than others. However, Intel definitely does some binning to get higher quality chips into lower power configurations.

Newer CPUs will also perform better at the same clockspeed. When comparing a 2xxx vs 6xxx or 7xxx CPU, the difference is roughly 30%, so a 3.7ghz i5 7600T (just as an example) would perform somewhere around a 4.8ghz i5 2xxx.
 
Solution
Dunno if it's of any interest to you, but power consumption is something I have great interest in. Here's a frequency vs wattage chart for the i5 in my signature (just CPU power):

mMBmP2A.png


My CPU has a 77w TDP, however at 2ghz it's a 15w chip, at 3ghz it's a 27w chip, at the stock 3.6ghz with an undervolt it's a 45w chip, at 4ghz it's a 60w chip and at 4.5ghz it's a 120w chip. Power consumption is exponential as clockspeed increases.
 


For gaming i'd make sure you get at least an intel core i5, if you expect to run triple A titles for a few years at a respectable frame rate. Even if it means spending most of your budget on it.