Asus Prime Z270-A vs. Asus ROG Strix Z270F Gaming - confused!!!

Strantford

Commendable
Jan 24, 2017
28
0
1,530
Hi everyone

I decided to build a new pc with an unlocked i7 and I am between these two mobos.

I am aware that Z270-A is the top m/b in the entry level of Asus Z270 while Strix Z270F is the no2 of the Strix family which sits in the middle category between ROG and Primes.

Now the critical question is which one is better in terms of gaming and potential future slight o/c?
They both appear to be in the same price tag (20 euro diff over the Strix in Europe).

Z270-A has additional on-board buttons for Mem-ok and PC reset that are absent in the more exprensive Z270F Gaming.
Z270-A has 1 Q connector included which is absent in the Strix.

The Strix on the other hand has some additional cables for led and some additional led lightling on-board (which are not relevant in my case as I have a closed pc case with no window).
The Strix also has supposedly better sound processing and better sound caps and materials.

They both claim to perform excellent on overclocking as they both claim of having the same "ASUS PRO Clock Technology".

Normally I would have expected the Strix to have some clear differences and advantages compared to the entry model like better quality material (closer to those of the TUF line) or much better o/c abilities, or increased connectivity, more usb 3.0, better PCIex shielding in all slots etc.

Now they appear pretty much similar in my eyes and with close price tag, I am really confused.

Which of the two would you suggest for gaming and future o/c?

Although they are pretty new on the market does anyone have relevant experience with one of them or another one in the Prime/Strix Z270 line?

Thanks in advance
 
Solution
You pretty much mentioned all the differences between the two. As far as overclocking, they are about the same. So the main question is if the differences you mentioned will be worth the 20, and I think for gamers the sound and ROG stuff will be worth it.

Strantford

Commendable
Jan 24, 2017
28
0
1,530
Thanks for your reply

If you are totally un-interested about led lighting though (like myself with a closed side case), is the extra 20 euros worth the slightly advanced sound option and the ROG stuff?

By ROG stuff I suspect you mean the extra software provided?
Is this software so much more important? It does not affect system resources and boot times to load all this software/apps running constantly in the background?
Is the "Sonic sound" gimming worth it so much for gaming? It does not affect the in game performance to have an extra sound radar implemented on screen by the mobo?

You cannot download and use the ROG software if you are on a Prime mobo? I don't mean of course for not supported functions but for common functions like monitoring, gaming, overclocking etc.

Finally what I would have been interested to see is their differences regarding
a) the quality of material and capacitors and chocks
b) their power delivery system, how many different phases each one of the two has, if it is all digital or partially analog etc.

Both are really important for the longevity and overclock capabilities of a mobo.

But no such information is available in Asus website or when you choose to compare the two of them.

For me as user these should have been the main focus points between different series of motherboards (e.g. entry level, vs. enthousiasts vs. core gamers) and not if they have 2-3 extra software apps or some Strix stickers inside the package or some gimmick led lights. These are really not important features on which to distinguish between different product categories.

Thus the "confusion". But perhaps it is only me
 
ASUS is always good about making even the base motherboard like a Z270-A very capable of overclocking. The only time you will notice a significant upgrade from a pure performance standpoint is when using top of the line ROG MAXIMUS VIII for extreme overclocking. Everything in between won't have a significant variance, at least of the recent Intel platforms.
 

Strantford

Commendable
Jan 24, 2017
28
0
1,530
Thanks for the reply

So material/components wise and partially quality wise is it correct to assume that the Strix Z270F is a better choice than the Prime Z270-A?
 

diazz123

Reputable
Sep 25, 2014
5
0
4,510




i have the same problem to choose mobo u think the Asus Rog Strix Z270F is clearly better choice?
 

Strantford

Commendable
Jan 24, 2017
28
0
1,530
It depends on your needs and your budget. If you don't want or don't care for the led lighting gimmick for example you can save a couple of euros (in Europe at least) and go for the small brother/sister the Prime version.

Or what type of gamer your are. Do you play solo or via lan/multiplayer. In the latter case you might use the relevant Asus ROG applications (available with the Strix), in the first case will not make a difference to you.

Also regarding the difference in the sound chip, if you are not a crazy audiophile, with an expensive sound system that can catch and enhance the fine sound details and you rely simply on a good pair of speakers or a good quality headphones (not crazy expensive ones) again I don't believe your ear will be able to hear the difference.

Also the audio drivers provided by Asus for the Strix version, do not work with Kodi in my case at least. Irrespective of Kodi version (16 or 17). I tried to solve it with Kodi community and devs without success. And finally I found the solution alone by using the Realtek HD Audio driver directly from Realtek and not the Asus modified one. In which case though you lose the audio application functionalities provided by the Asus Audio console.
 

joemitri

Prominent
Mar 19, 2017
1
0
510
I think based on reviews, ASus Prime Z270-A is the only motherboard of all the new z270 that support thunderbolt 40GB/s ...you need to buy that extra pcie piece...but it's the only motherboard supporting that crazy speed , so you should consider that if it's important to you !