fx4300 good for budget?

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
Hi, im building a budget for somebody else. will a fx4300 be enough for at least 720 p with a radeon rx 460 ? i know its outdated but they wont a cheap solution. alternative is using a used lga 775 system with a xeon x5460 but if i go with fx4300 i can go with a new motherboard for almost same price.








 

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
thanks for answers but as i said they want a cheap solution and dont care about the new stuff, as long as it works.
the g4560 motherboards are to expensive for this build , the cpu is cheap but as i understand only work after updating bios on the older cheaper boards.
 


Ok then - how do you want this "cheap solution" to work for you? What will you be using this build for?
 

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
theyre gonna use it for surf and some budget gaming so the question is will fx4300 paired with that card be enough for decent performance when gaming. i seen videos of it handling battlefield 1 so i guess its not that bad

 


Seen videos of it handling BF1... Sure. That game is currently wrecking even some i7's. The internet is full of people that are getting 100 FPS in BF1 from the integrated graphics on a Pentium.

$50 for an FX 4300? I'd try to knock them down to $40. Even then, it doesn't change the fact that it's really a dual core with very low IPC (some call this weak cores). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgejkSWzvNs
 

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
well i tried battlefield 1 with a core 2 quad q9650 and a geforce gt740 2 gb ddr5 and it played the game on medium settings on 720 p stable the question is how does this compare to that cpu and how much weaker is it than fx6100 and fx6300?
 

TJ Hooker

Titan
Ambassador

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
thanks, but will that motherboard have updated bios for the g4560? i dont got Another 1151 cpu myself to update it.
and i cant order from newegg here . i can get the cpu for about that price to but the problem is the cheaper boards are most likely not
bios updated for that cpu
 

TJ Hooker

Titan
Ambassador

I imagine you can check with the retailer what BIOS it comes with. Kaby Lake BIOSs have been out for ~4 months, I'd think any retailer that moves products at a decent rate should have cleared out old mobos by now and should have ones with up to date BIOSs.
 


Both of the Intel SKUs you listed are true quad cores. The FX 4300 was supposed to be a quad core but AMD banked on software solutions that never happened. Long story short, Windows has no idea how to use all four cores on an FX 4000 series CPU.
 


I can't answer that question for sure. I'd like to say that the seller knows what he/she is doing and has sold the older BIOS versions first, but that's not always the case. You'll have to ask the seller.
 


Their quad-core FX chips have four cores, their hexa-core FX chips have six cores, and their octa-core FX chips have eight cores. The problem is that they're not optimized for how Windows identifies and uses CPU cores. Since AMD packed each pair of cores into a module, Windows identifies the module as a core and a thread but can't even use the thread to the extent that it can with Intel HyperThreading. Basically, FX is dead.

Here's a helpful video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgejkSWzvNs
 

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
speccy shows 6 cores on my amd fx6300 so does windows but i guess that they cant be fully utlilized at same time thats what you saying? i read about that and people seem to disagree about this . not saying your wrong just saying theres aot of talk about that
 


Cinebench and Valley Benchmark beg to differ. The CPU identifies as a six core CPU, but programs that look past that and actually count the cores find only three because that's all that Windows can find.

When you say "so does Windows", what are you referring to? If you mean that you've gone into System Information and looked at it, it's just showing how the CPU identifies. It says it has six cores, so Windows writes six cores. If you go into Device Manager, you'll find six instances of the CPU but this doesn't imply six cores. Just as a dual-core i3 with four threads will show four times in Device Manger, the FX chip is shown six times because Windows found six threads.
 

valhallarising

Reputable
Sep 24, 2015
518
0
5,010
yeah i guess intel got the upper hand all the time, i Think fx6300 is decent though if you dont got the highest demands but maybe not future proof. what about the g4560 will the two cores and four threads be enough for games in a few years to or will they need at least 4 true cores?