GT 740 or GTX 740 (OEM)
- Thread starter Gogeto_16
- Start date
doesn't change the answers. GTX of same number is ALWAYS better than GT and OEM only affects packaging of said card, not it's performance.
so go for GTX 745 oem (slightly faster clock speeds compared to GT 740)
If you want to compare cards yourself, this is a pretty good place.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-745-oem/specifications
so go for GTX 745 oem (slightly faster clock speeds compared to GT 740)
If you want to compare cards yourself, this is a pretty good place.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-745-oem/specifications
I would bet on "no, you cannot" based on game's requirements.
MINIMUM:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon HD 7970 (2 GB VRAM)
RECOMMENDED:
Processor: Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.4 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 or AMD Radeon R9 290X (3 GB VRAM)
You would have good enough processor and enough ram but your GPU would lack the minimum requirement. If the game runs at all, it would be on minimum detail level and low resolution, Running it on ultra would require better than minimum or recommended GPU
MINIMUM:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon HD 7970 (2 GB VRAM)
RECOMMENDED:
Processor: Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.4 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 or AMD Radeon R9 290X (3 GB VRAM)
You would have good enough processor and enough ram but your GPU would lack the minimum requirement. If the game runs at all, it would be on minimum detail level and low resolution, Running it on ultra would require better than minimum or recommended GPU
I would still say "no" since 750 ti is less than recommended 780 (It is also slower than earlier generation 680 which is the recommended card)
Now, Assasin creed games have been poorly optimized in general for quite a while now, meaning that things might not be smooth and pretty on even best hardware but.... yeah, below minimum specs would mean you might get it to run on low details.
Edit:
Based on relative speed/cheap cost, 1050 would be more effective as a choice, the game might even run on said card.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050/2187vs3650
Case in point: 680 is almost twice as fast as 750 TI on most things, giving the general idea of relative performance.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-680/2187vs3148
Now, Assasin creed games have been poorly optimized in general for quite a while now, meaning that things might not be smooth and pretty on even best hardware but.... yeah, below minimum specs would mean you might get it to run on low details.
Edit:
Based on relative speed/cheap cost, 1050 would be more effective as a choice, the game might even run on said card.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050/2187vs3650
Case in point: 680 is almost twice as fast as 750 TI on most things, giving the general idea of relative performance.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-680/2187vs3148
cheaper? no. it used to be in 300 USD range, while 1050 TI is close to 100. The reason for 680's cost is that it used to be top of the line card (see the last two digits, 80) and while old, people still ask relatively much for them.
Yes, raw power wise, 680 is bit better than 1050 but... if you have a low budget, go for 1050.
if you have that 300 to spend, get more recent card than 680, like 1060, it will be around 50% faster than old 680 for same cost or lower.
1050 TI vs 680, 680 is around 20% faster and cost 2.5 times more (250 to 300)
680 vs 1060, 1060 is around 50% faster and costs around same. (250 to 300)
so if you need to get a card at low price, 1050 TI is good choice
if you don't have as tight budget restraints, 1060 is decent alternative.
looking at youtube, people get AC unity to play at 30 to 45 FPS on ultra/high details with 1050 TI so it could fit your needs.
Yes, raw power wise, 680 is bit better than 1050 but... if you have a low budget, go for 1050.
if you have that 300 to spend, get more recent card than 680, like 1060, it will be around 50% faster than old 680 for same cost or lower.
1050 TI vs 680, 680 is around 20% faster and cost 2.5 times more (250 to 300)
680 vs 1060, 1060 is around 50% faster and costs around same. (250 to 300)
so if you need to get a card at low price, 1050 TI is good choice
if you don't have as tight budget restraints, 1060 is decent alternative.
looking at youtube, people get AC unity to play at 30 to 45 FPS on ultra/high details with 1050 TI so it could fit your needs.
for new, following page kind of lists the choices:
http://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=380&sort=a8&page=1
Used? besides seemingly same or higher prices, possibly more hassle to handle return/repaid/warranty if problems appear:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_dcat=27386&Chipset%252FGPU%2520Model=NVIDIA%2520GeForce%2520GTX%25201050%2520Ti&_sop=15
Of course, good deals might mean that you get it used for less than that.
edit: Since the card upgrade is pretty big one, you should check that you are able to connect it to your monitor, most new GPU's don't have direct VGA output while older screens have only that. pretty much all have DVI though. If connectors are different, getting right kind of adapter/converter/cable will make it usable.
http://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=380&sort=a8&page=1
Used? besides seemingly same or higher prices, possibly more hassle to handle return/repaid/warranty if problems appear:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_dcat=27386&Chipset%252FGPU%2520Model=NVIDIA%2520GeForce%2520GTX%25201050%2520Ti&_sop=15
Of course, good deals might mean that you get it used for less than that.
edit: Since the card upgrade is pretty big one, you should check that you are able to connect it to your monitor, most new GPU's don't have direct VGA output while older screens have only that. pretty much all have DVI though. If connectors are different, getting right kind of adapter/converter/cable will make it usable.
but still thankx for these websitesTRENDING THREADS
-
News US sanctions transform China into legacy chip production juggernaut — production jumped 40% in Q1 2024- Started by Admin
- Replies: 34
-
-
Question New pc build r9 7900x3d rtx 4080 super no post only ram rgb turns on- Started by Harvey Durward
- Replies: 5
-
RTX 4070 vs RX 7900 GRE faceoff: Which mainstream graphics card is better?
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 72
-
-
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Question RTX 2060 Zotac stops giving display output when pushed hard
- Latest: MJS WARLORD
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram