Need a budget pc build configuration for a carreer in architecture

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
I am going to buy on june 2017 ...need help for the configuration . my budget is under 1700 $ .(cpu , monitor and other accessories)

i came up with this for my cpu as minimum requirements

Processor - i7 7700k
Motherboard - z270 chipset
SSD - 512 GB
HDD - 1 TB
RAM - 16 BG (8GB x 2) DDR4 2400 Mhz

if there is a better configuration available for the budget please notify me , i dont plan on updating for another 4 years or so...

the applications i plan on using are autocad , revit , lumion , photoshop , sketchup , archicad , rhinoceres , 3dsmax and also occasionally would play games

the gpu should be with in budget, it is not my first priority . My order of priority is first processor then ssd then ram only after that gpu

i am looking for suggestions ..if i am wrong please correct me i am looking forward for answers
 
Solution


Pavitran_12,

There is a Ryzen 7 1700X /.ASUS X370 Prime system on Passmark is running a CPU rating of 20338 which calculates to 4.5GHz and a single thread mark of about 2500, putting in the company of the fastest 8-cores ever. The only 8-core I know that can match it is the Xeon E5-1680 v2 which was designed to overclock to 4.3- GHz- but new cost $1,723. If the local retail shop has 8-core i3's running at 4.5GHz they are a secret from Intel.

The average Passmark single-thread mark...
A little above $1700 (due to shipping), but you might want to take a look at this setup:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2GHz Quad-Core Processor ($339.00 @ B&H)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H5 Universal 65.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($46.99 @ Newegg Marketplace)
Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270-E GAMING ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($189.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Memory: Kingston FURY 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-2133 Memory ($227.97 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($159.99 @ Jet)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($49.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Video Card: Asus Radeon RX 480 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($244.99 @ Jet)
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro M ATX Mid Tower Case ($85.98 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: SeaSonic G 550W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($69.99 @ Newegg)
Monitor: LG 29UM67 29.0" 2560x1080 60Hz Monitor ($297.37 @ Amazon)
Total: $1712.25
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-25 14:38 EST-0500
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
thanks for the suggestion @raisonjohn

i am thinking of quadro M2000 for gpu

and 16GB for memory

but still looking for better configs ..have time till june

more suggestions guys
 


Pavitran_12,

System: For your uses, 3D modeling requires a good single-thread - one core-performance, and the i7-7700K has the highest score in that category. However, the output of the work is rendering and in order to have CPU rendering capability, which has a better image quality for single images, having at least a six core CPU is a good approach. To have a fast single-thread rate and a lot of cores is typically expensive.

CPU: But, only in the last few days, the pre-release tests of the new AMD Ryzeon series processors have the potential to completely alter the market. The first series are AM4 8-cores with healthy clock speeds, and they are astoundingly reasonably priced, the Ryzen 1700X is 8 core@ 3.4/3.8GHz costing only $399. On Geekbench 3, the single threaded score is 4356 as compared to the i7-7700K 4792. It's not surprising that the 4-core i7 would have a better score, but the 1700X has a score of 155 wins by two points over the i7-6900K 8C@ 3.2/3.8GHz using 140W and cost $1,050- a more fair comparison. > The CPU costing 38% of the other is still faster.

GPU: The news is also encouraging in the GPU world- another amazing bargain is on the way. NVIDIA is releasing in March new Pascal Quadros including a replacement for the M2000 4GB, the P2000 which is 160=bit and 5GB. The price may be about $50 more than the M2000- $475 or so. In tests, the P2000 is faster than the M4000 8GB, for example scoring 7.37 on a Solidworks shaded with edges mode test against the M4000 at 7.10 and the M5000- a $1,900 GPU at 7.35. Solidworks is tough customer too requiring a very strong single-thread action. In summary, run don't walk to the local Quadro store when the P2000 arrives.

Here's an idea:

High Performance 2D /3D /Rendering System_2.26.17

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1700X 3.4/3.8GHz 8-Core Processor ($399.99 @ B&H)
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B350-PLUS AM4 AMD ATX Motherboards - AMD ($99.99)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H7 Tower Cooler For AMD ($34.99)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($94.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($159.99 @ Jet)
Storage: Western Digital Blue 2TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive ($64.99 @ NCIX US)
Video Card: PNY Quadro M2000 4GB Video Card ($426.99 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: Samsung ZenDrive GP65NB60/BLK/G/AS ($29.99)
Power Supply: Corsair CXM 550W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($68.98 @ Newegg)
Case: Thermaltake Suppressor F51 ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit ($128.31 @ OutletPC)
___________________________________________________________
Total= $1619.16

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-26 07:12 EST-0500

With monitor /keyboard and mouse, that will be close to $1,800, but the chance to have 8-cores for rendering in that price range is close to magic. Probably before that time there will be another series of new AM4 CPU's, and those will be 6-core and 4-core, so it might also work to buy a 6-core and higher rated X370 motherboard, leaving still leaving more for the monitor. If at all possible, I recommend two monitors- two 24" are far more useful than a single 30"

Another approach is the one I use, which is to buy a used workstation and upgrade:

HP Z420 WORKSTATION Computer 500GB 8GB XEON E5-1650 V2 (HEXA-CORE) W/HT #30592# Sold for $349.98 (12.25.16)

That a really good Xeon- 6 Core@3.5/3.9Ghz and the z420 is very quiet and ultra reliable. Best of all, it's really usable out of the box and there is a lot support at one place- hp.com- manuals BIOS, drivers firmware. We have three HP z's in the office along with four Dell Precisions.

The low price of the system means it could be upgraded to 32GB (DDR3-1866 ECC), a 500GB SSD and fast 2TB storage drive, and plenty left over for a pair of good 24" or even 27" monitors.

So, in a few weeks, there will be great steps in cost/performance in both CPU's and GPU's or the used workstation is attractively priced and easy to do and performance is completely useful.

If you build, when you are closer to building the system, you might consider changing to the 1800X 3.6/4.0Gz- $499 (= +$100)- which has been overclocked on liquid Nitrogen to 5.2Ghz but is said to run easily at 4.5GHz at which point the single-threaded score is the same as the 4/5GHz i7-7700K- except the 1700X has twice as many cores.

If you decide on the 1800X, also look at the ASUS Prime 370X motherboard - about $150. Those two changes- $100 + $50 would have a lot of affect.

Later, consider upgrading to 32GB of RAM. In the list above, the RAM is 2X 16GB so another 16Gb can be added. Ryzen is dual channel memory, so there is no penalty for running with two modules. I recently was unable to run a large rendering of a complex model as the 32Gb system ran out of memory.

It amazing to think of the very high level of performance possible under $2,000. A few days ago I was almost pushing the buy button for a used $1,100 Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 8C @ 3.0 /3.8GHz or I'd buy 2X E5-2667 v2's at about $1,000 each. Today, the plan is different

Cheers,

BambiBoom

CAD / 3D Modeling / Graphic Design:

HP z420 (2015) (Rev 3) > Xeon E5-1660 v2 (6-core @ 3.7 / 4.0GHz) / 32GB DDR3 -1866 ECC RAM / Quadro K4200 (4GB) / Samsung SM951 M.2 256GB AHCI + Intel 730 480GB (9SSDSC2BP480G4R5) + Western Digital Black WD1003FZEX 1TB> M-Audio 192 sound card + Logitech z2300 2.1 speakers > 600W PSU> > Windows 7 Professional 64-bit >> 2X Dell Ultrasharp U2715H (2560 X 1440)
[ Passmark Rating = 5581 > CPU= 14046 / 2D= 838 / 3D= 4694 / Mem= 2777 / Disk= 11559] [6.12.16]

Analysis / Simulation / Rendering:

HP z620 (2012) (Rev 3) 2X Xeon E5-2690 (8-core @ 2.9 / 3.8GHz) / 64GB DDR3-1600 ECC reg) / Quadro K2200 (4GB) + Tesla M2090 (6GB) / HP Z Turbo Drive (256GB) + Samsung 850 Evo 250GB + Seagate Constellation ES.3 (1TB) / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium PCIe sound card + Logitech z313 2.1 speakers / 800W / Windows 7 Professional 64-bit > > HP 2711x (27" 1980 X 1080)
[ Passmark System Rating= 5675 / CPU= 22625 / 2D= 815 / 3D = 3580 / Mem = 2522 / Disk = 12640 ] 9.25.16
[ Cinebench R15: OpenGL= 119.23 fps / CPU = 2209 cb / Single core 130 cb / MP Ratio 16.84x] 10.31.16
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
System: For your uses, 3D modeling requires a good single-thread - one core-performance, and the i7-7700K has the highest score in that category. However, the output of the work is rendering and in order to have CPU rendering capability, which has a better image quality for single images, having at least a six core CPU is a good approach. To have a fast single-thread rate and a lot of cores is typically expensive.

CPU: But, only in the last few days, the pre-release tests of the new AMD Ryzeon series processors have the potential to completely alter the market. The first series are AM4 8-cores with healthy clock speeds, and they are astoundingly reasonably priced, the Ryzen 1700X is 8 core@ 3.4/3.8GHz costing only $399. On Geekbench 3, the single threaded score is 4356 as compared to the i7-7700K 4792. It's not surprising that the 4-core i7 would have a better score, but the 1700X has a score of 155 wins by two points over the i7-6900K 8C@ 3.2/3.8GHz using 140W and cost $1,050- a more fair comparison. > The CPU costing 38% of the other is still faster.

GPU: The news is also encouraging in the GPU world- another amazing bargain is on the way. NVIDIA is releasing in March new Pascal Quadros including a replacement for the M2000 4GB, the P2000 which is 160=bit and 5GB. The price may be about $50 more than the M2000- $475 or so. In tests, the P2000 is faster than the M4000 8GB, for example scoring 7.37 on a Solidworks shaded with edges mode test against the M4000 at 7.10 and the M5000- a $1,900 GPU at 7.35. Solidworks is tough customer too requiring a very strong single-thread action. In summary, run don't walk to the local Quadro store when the P2000 arrives.

Here's an idea:

High Performance 2D /3D /Rendering System_2.26.17

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1700X 3.4/3.8GHz 8-Core Processor ($399.99 @ B&H)
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B350-PLUS AM4 AMD ATX Motherboards - AMD ($99.99)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H7 Tower Cooler For AMD ($34.99)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($94.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($159.99 @ Jet)
Storage: Western Digital Blue 2TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive ($64.99 @ NCIX US)
Video Card: PNY Quadro M2000 4GB Video Card ($426.99 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: Samsung ZenDrive GP65NB60/BLK/G/AS ($29.99)
Power Supply: Corsair CXM 550W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($68.98 @ Newegg)
Case: Thermaltake Suppressor F51 ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit ($128.31 @ OutletPC)
___________________________________________________________
Total= $1619.16

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-26 07:12 EST-0500

With monitor /keyboard and mouse, that will be close to over $1,800, but the 8-cores fro rendering in that price range is close to magic.

Another approach is the one I use, which is to buy a used workstation and upgrade:

HP Z420 WORKSTATION Computer 500GB 8GB XEON E5-1650 V2 (HEXA-CORE) W/HT #30592# Sold for $349.98 (12.25.16)

That a really good Xeon- 6 Core@3.5/3.9Ghz and the z420 is very quiet and ultra reliable. Best of all, it's really usable out of the box and there is a lot support at one place- hp.com- manuals BIOS, drivers firmware. We have three HP z's in the office along with four Dell Precisions.

The low price of the system means it could be upgraded to 32GB (DDR3-1866 ECC), a 500GB SSD and fast 2TB storage drive, and plenty left over for a pair of good 24" or even 27" monitors.

So, in a few weeks, there will be great steps in cost/performance in both CPU's and GPU's or the used workstation is attractively priced and easy to do and performance is completely useful.

If you build, when you are closer to building the system, you might consider changing to the 1800X 3.6/4.0Gz- $499 (= +$100)- which has been overclocked on liquid Nitrogen to 5.2Ghz but is said to run easily at 4.5GHz at which point the single-threaded score is the same as the 4/5GHz i7-7700K- except the 1700X has twice as many cores.

If you decide on the 1800X, also look at the ASUS Prime 370X motherboard - about $150. Those two changes- $100 + $50 would have a lot of affect.

Later, consider upgrading to 32GB of RAM. In the list above, the RAM is 2X 16GB so another 16Gb can be added. Ryzen is dual channel memory, so there is no penalty for running with two modules. I recently was unable to run a large rendering of a complex model as the 32Gb system ran out of memory.

It amazing to think of the very high level of performance possible under $2,000. A few days ago I was almost pushing the buy button for a used $1,100 Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 8C @ 3.0 /3.8GHz or I'd buy 2X E5-2667 v2's at about $1,000 each. Today, the plan is different

Cheers,

BambiBoom

CAD / 3D Modeling / Graphic Design:

HP z420 (2015) (Rev 3) > Xeon E5-1660 v2 (6-core @ 3.7 / 4.0GHz) / 32GB DDR3 -1866 ECC RAM / Quadro K4200 (4GB) / Samsung SM951 M.2 256GB AHCI + Intel 730 480GB (9SSDSC2BP480G4R5) + Western Digital Black WD1003FZEX 1TB> M-Audio 192 sound card + Logitech z2300 2.1 speakers > 600W PSU> > Windows 7 Professional 64-bit >> 2X Dell Ultrasharp U2715H (2560 X 1440)
[ Passmark Rating = 5581 > CPU= 14046 / 2D= 838 / 3D= 4694 / Mem= 2777 / Disk= 11559] [6.12.16]

Analysis / Simulation / Rendering:

HP z620 (2012) (Rev 3) 2X Xeon E5-2690 (8-core @ 2.9 / 3.8GHz) / 64GB DDR3-1600 ECC reg) / Quadro K2200 (4GB) + Tesla M2090 (6GB) / HP Z Turbo Drive (256GB) + Samsung 850 Evo 250GB + Seagate Constellation ES.3 (1TB) / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium PCIe sound card + Logitech z313 2.1 speakers / 800W / Windows 7 Professional 64-bit > > HP 2711x (27" 1980 X 1080)
[ Passmark System Rating= 5675 / CPU= 22625 / 2D= 815 / 3D = 3580 / Mem = 2522 / Disk = 12640 ] 9.25.16
[ Cinebench R15: OpenGL= 119.23 fps / CPU = 2209 cb / Single core 130 cb / MP Ratio 16.84x] 10.31.16[/quotemsg]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bambiboom

your suggestion was very helpful

but i have been learning about the processors , gpus a lot lately
i learnt that intel (i5,i7) processors are expensive but better suited for 3d modelling , rendering , animations , etc (professional workload)
and amd processors are cheaper with more cores , etc but are only good for gaming

i also heard that intel (xeon) processors are good for servers no matter how many cores they have similar to the amd processors .
if i am wrong please guide me because i am very confused ...because i too believe that more cores , better the workload can be split and handled

and as for the gpu thank you so much for the information about P2000 i am looking forward to it .

looking forward for your reply

pavitran_12
 

lodders

Admirable
The best way to spec your PC is to read some tests and reviews of computers when running the apps you are interested in. You will find out how much benefit a faster CPU or more memory etc makes in when doing tasks that you need to do for your job.
Quadro GPU are designed for business apps, but in CAD related tests last year some gaming cards performed better for less money.

When building a computer, more power is always better, but above a certain level, you pay a lot of extra money for a bit more power. Have a look at passmark.com to compare how much bang you get for your buck.
My daughter is a Civil engineering student. She has been doing her university final year project using Autocad and Revit. Her computer is a 3.9Ghz Haswell i5 with budget motherboard, 16Gb RAM, SSD and onboard graphics. It cost under $600 and works well.
 
You are really building at a good time. By June Ryzen should have released their R5 and the R7 line will have been on the market long enough for us to have some real numbers to look at. Early indications are that at the same clock speeds AMD's new Ryzen processor may be within a few percentage points or even better than the i7 7700K in single core performance. A recent benchmark of a R7 1800X overclocked via a generic "one click auto overclock" on air produced better single core performance than the i7 7700K. The i7 7700K is clocked higher than the R7 1800X out of the box, and we don't know what the R7 1800X was overclocked to but being an "auto overclock" it was probably 4.2 - 4.5Ghz at best, which is where the i7 7700K is clocked. If the R7 1800X can outperform the i7 7700K in single core execution then the much more reasonably priced R7 1700(X) or the R5 4 core 8 thread processors just may outperform the i7 7700K at the same clock speeds at a better value.

With not building until June you should have several processors to choose between and prices may be better across the board. Intel for the first time in many years actually has competition again with AMD's Ryzen.
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
lodders

well said you are right but the only reason i made a budget of 1700 $(including monitor) is to buy the latest suitable processor and a good gpu which would allow me to work for another 4 years without having to upgrade thus made the config..min ,req standard as :

i7 processor , 16-32 gb ram , 512 gb ssd , quadro M2000/ Geforce gtx 1070

more then rendering i want my pc to run smoothly when i am in the 3d designing process without any lag

thanks for your reply , looking forward for more responses
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
redneck5439

thanks for the info on the AMD's Ryzen processor will keep an eye on that . I never thought about the amd processors till now but now i am thinking maybe why not give it a try . waiting eagerly to purchase on june

thank you very much , waiting for more options

pavitran_12
 


To be perfectly honest, AMD processors in single core performance weren't worth thinking about or considering till now. AMD Piledriver processors were good at rendering and video editing, but were easily outperformed in heavily single threaded applications, such as architectural engineering. Ryzen was focused on IPC and better single thread execution from the ground up. AMD was originally hoping that Ryzen would have a 40% IPC gain over their Excavator arch, but they overshot that goal and actually hit 52% IPC gain over Excavator. What that means is instead of Ryzen being more or less equal to Intel Haswell, Ryzen is more or less equal to Intel's newest 7th generation Kaby Lake processors, and Ryzen is only in first generation.
 


AMD got a really bad "black eye" with Bulldozer and hasn't really been able to throw that image off yet, even though Piledriver was a capable (although not as good as Intel offerings) processor line. However prior to Bulldozer AMD had the Athlon and then the Phenom series processors, both of which were very good offering right off the bat. Any retailer can have a bad roll out or problems with a particular product line. AMD had very bad mojo with Bulldozer, however that has no bearing on Ryzen. In every leaked benchmark and every "early" benchmark of Ryzen the architecture has been beyond impressive. The R7 1800X in early benchmarks is actually outperforming the i7 6900K. This is the closest comparison between Intel and Ryzen currently available as they are both 8 cores and 16 threads. What is truly remarkable is that the R7 1800X is priced at $499 and the i7 6900K is a whopping $1000+.

What is also impressive is that Ryzen has lower TDP than its Intel counterparts. The R7 1800X is only 95W compared to the i7 6900K at a whopping 140W. What that means is at stock the R7 1800X will use less power and the R7 1800X should have much better overclocking overhead.

Ryzen performing this good in first generation is a groundbreaking feat. Hopefully AMD is able to achieve better generational performance gains than Intel has been able to with their iCore architecture.
 


In theory yes, but in actual real world performance not always. We may find that the best configuration for performance is an R7 or R5 CPU and a Nvidia GTX 1080Ti GPU. Only time will tell the full truth, but early benchmarks look very good for AMD's Ryzen and Vega lines. It is very possible that Ryzen R7 and R5 with Vega GPUs will be the go to best bang for buck platform for engineers and gamers alike.
 
"your suggestion was very helpful

but i have been learning about the processors , gpus a lot lately
i learnt that intel (i5,i7) processors are expensive but better suited for 3d modelling , rendering , animations , etc (professional workload)
and amd processors are cheaper with more cores , etc but are only good for gaming

i also heard that intel (xeon) processors are good for servers no matter how many cores they have similar to the amd processors .
if i am wrong please guide me because i am very confused ...because i too believe that more cores , better the workload can be split and handled

and as for the gpu thank you so much for the information about P2000 i am looking forward to it .

looking forward for your reply"


pavitran_12

The way to think about workstation CPU's is in two terms: the single-thread performance- how many calculations does the first core make per unit time and two, how many cores can work on the kind of calculations that can be distributed over several cores.

All 2D and 3D CAD programs I've ever head of are fundamentally single-threaded, although Windows does distribute some CPU loadsSo, for all the 3D modeling on the proposed system, the single-thread performance is the key CPU parameter. The single-thread performance is directly related to the maximum clock speed of the first core. On the i7-7700K , that speed is 4.5GHz, I think the highest native (non-overcloked) of any CPU, and the Ryzen 1700X at 3.8GHz, is lower, but extremely good for an 8-core. the parameters change when evaluating a CPU for rendering, server, and video editing applications as to varying degrees, those programs are written to use all available cores. Servers are are the best at using all the cores and it's better to have more cores than the cores' speed. With rendering applications, the ability to use all cores efficiently cores. Solidworks rendering is the best (I know of) in that every core added to the rendering stream decreases rendering time, but Adobe CS /CC programs seem to run their best with 5-6 cores and if there are two processors, they start really balking.

The different requirements of modeling and rendering means that the CPU has to be compromise- fast single thread rate, and the ideal number of cores. But, as there are more cores, the clock speed inevitably is reduced. On the best compromise CPU's was the Xeon E5-2687w v2 which was 8-core @ 3.4 /4.0GHz and could be used in a dual CPU configuration. That systems could therefore be very good at 3D modeling- the Passmark single threaded performance is 2052, CPU rendering, and database /analytical /server use, but when new cost $2,200 each. That CPU will probably run all 8-cores at 3.5-3.6GHz. We have a dedicated rendering system that uses two Xeon E5-2690 8-cores @ 2.9 /3.8GHz from the previous generation of Xeons- new $2,050 each. Single- threaded is 1857 and in all-core performance those are running 3.3 /3.4GHz. The main mdeoling system uses a Xeon E5-1660 v2 6-core @ 3.7/ 4.0 GHz (about $1,200 new) and you can see how fewer cores means higher clock speeds.

I mention the core count to clock speed and the cost of these various processors to demonstrate the breakthrough nature of the new AMD Ryzen CPU's. compare the Ryzen 1800X, 8-core @ 3.6/4.0GHz for $500 to the E5-2687w v2 8-core @ 3.4 /4.0GHz but that cost 4X as much. And, although it's early days, we know that the 1800X can be easily overclocked to 4.5GHz where it has been tested to show the same single-threaded performance of the i7-7700K- which is only 4-cores. The i7-7700K cost $370 at the start, then became $350 and suddenly yesterday as a response to the Ryzen is now $299. Is Intel just a but worried? The i7-6900K 8-core@ 3.2/4.0GHz has dropped from $1,050 to $1,000, but that is still double the cost of the 1800X which is 8C@3.6 /4.0 and can overclocked.

Time will tell if the new Ryzens have any irregularities running current workstation programs, but a data stream is a data stream and problems are far more likely to occur in the GPU. Autodesk, Adobe, and Dessault (Solidworks and Catia) are NViDIA-centric by being CUDA accelerated, so I'd have a Ryzen 1800X with a Quadro P2000 GPU. Here's my first idea for a system to run Autodesk building Suite Ultimate, Solidworks, Sketchup, 3ds, Maya, and Adobe CS6:

High Performance Workstation_Ryzen 7 1800X_2.25.17

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1800X 3.6GHz 8-Core Processor ($499.99 @ B&H)

CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4 ($64.95)

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO ATX AM4 Motherboard ($162.98 @ Newegg)

Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($459.99 @ Newegg)

Video Card: Quadro P2000 (about $475)

Drive 1: Samsung 960 Evo 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive ($249.99 @ B&H)

Drive 2: Crucial MX300 1.1TB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($262.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Optical Drive: Samsung ZenDrive GP65NB60/BLK/G/AS ($29.99)

Case: Thermaltake Suppressor F51 ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Power Supply: SeaSonic PRIME Gold 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($114.90 @ SuperBiiz)

Total= $1955.77 = about $2440 with Quadro P2000

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-26 13:31 EST-0500
_______________________________________________________________________
Total: about $2,450

Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-25 11:07 EST-0500

To have a single 8-core Intel approaching this performance I had planned to buy a used Xeon E5-2687w v2 for about $1,200 that would have a quite a bit lower single-thread performance, use DDR3-1866 instead of DDR4-2666, require a $400+_ motherboard, and would not have NVMe drive support. I we have already bought a new HP z820 chassis and used motherboard but the project would still cost $3,500+ with a used CPU for lesser performance.

We have 11 Xeon systems in the office and as difficult is it to let go of an Xeon prejudice- based on years of good performance and reliability, so far the cost /performance potential of the new system put the new/old Xeon idea on hold and the Ryzen configuration looking better and better.

Cheers,

BambiBoom


 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
Bambiboom

thank you so much for the info you cleared all my doubts about the cores , processors ,etc
now i have a clear view to what a rendering device requires and a 3d modelling device in terms of processor.
i am also fixed on the P2000 series as my gpu and AMD RYZEN 7 1800X as my processor but the only problem i face now is my budget (1700 $)

i have to buy everything else for the cpu and also the monitor within this price range :(
i love your suggested configuration once i make money i could afford it but now fully dependent on my dad and i am squeezing a few 100 $ from my pockets to reach (1700$)

still thank you for the knowledge it was very useful
 


The basic configuration given is a good one, but if its out of your budget you can substitute a few items. You can substitute one of the solid state drives for a conventional Barracuda HDD 2TB and save about $100. You could also go with 32GB of RAM to start with and then get another 32GB if and when you need it. Those two things alone will save you around $300. You could also go with a more budget minded case and save around $50 more, just make sure you get a bigger mid or full tower. You can play around with those things till it fits your budget, but you want to keep the processor, CPU cooler, motherboard, power supply all about the same as they are good suggestions without going overboard.
 


Pavitran_12,

Perhaps it wasn't clearly stated, but the $2,450 Ryzen 7 1800X system is the system we are considering to replace the current HP z420 E5-1660 v2 system. The one for your consideration was the $1,618 Ryzen 7 1700X system, revised to include the monitor, keyboard, and mouse:

High Performance 2D /3D /Rendering System_2.25.17 (Revised)

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD RYZEN 7 1700X 3.4 / 3.8GHz 8-Core Processor ($399.99 @ B&H)
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B350-PLUS AM4 AMD ATX Motherboards - AMD ($99.99)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master MasterAir Pro 3 28.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($29.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($94.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($97.99 @ B&H)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($49.98 @ SuperBiiz)
Video Card: PNY Quadro M2000 4GB Video Card ($426.99 @ Newegg)
Case: Thermaltake Suppressor F51 ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Power Supply: Corsair CXM 550W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($68.98 @ Newegg)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit ($138.49 @ SuperBiiz)
Optical Drive: Samsung ZenDrive GP65NB60/BLK/G/AS ($29.99)

Monitor:https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824014377 BenQ GL2460HM Black 24" TN 2ms (GTG) LCD/LED Monitor ($129.99 @ Newegg)
KeyBoard /Mouse: Logitech MK200 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo - Black > ($19.99 @ Newegg)
________________________________________________________

Total= $1,696.36

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-02-26 23:08 EST-0500

Cheers,

BambiBoom
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510


i am buying on june so i think we will know how it performs by then ...
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510
The basic configuration given is a good one, but if its out of your budget you can substitute a few items. You can substitute one of the solid state drives for a conventional Barracuda HDD 2TB and save about $100. You could also go with 32GB of RAM to start with and then get another 32GB if and when you need it. Those two things alone will save you around $300. You could also go with a more budget minded case and save around $50 more, just make sure you get a bigger mid or full tower. You can play around with those things till it fits your budget, but you want to keep the processor, CPU cooler, motherboard, power supply all about the same as they are good suggestions without going overboard.

yeah thanks i think it will be a good idea

 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510


thank you ,
i think its a good configuration i would just love it more if it was 32 gb of ram and 500 gb ssd the rest are cool
maybe the prices would be more suitable for me by june
 

user11464

Notable
Feb 25, 2017
661
0
1,160
I hate to be that guy... and I am partially joking... but partially serious...

This is going to be for this guy's career and his livelyhood depends on it. Are you really going to recommend an AMD Processor to him? Ok, jokes aside, simply look at what others in that field of work use...

Always go with the gut. It's hard to kill a Toyota.
 

Pavitran_12

Prominent
Feb 25, 2017
19
0
510



hi
thankyou for your concern ...dont worry
i am still waiting for the products review till the beginning of june so if it doesnt work out i can always go back to intel
i wont spend the money unless i am 100% sure about the products performance .

if you can suggest me a better intel version config for my requirements i am open to all suggestions within my budget i will pick the right one at the end .

i will ask for final check after i make my choice on june before i make the purchase .
 

user11464

Notable
Feb 25, 2017
661
0
1,160
I think as of currently, your CPU choice is solid. It's what I would choose personally. Price to performance is great. Overclocking is stable with it. It's proven. It doesn't cause you to have to skimp on other components to fit it into budget. There are literally no negatives, unless you count performance compared to something that costs more, which is a factor that applies to every CPU. It's the top tier of Intel's consumer line, so the only competition is literally Ryzen.