Hello there
I recently bought an Asus RX 460 Strix, with 4GB VRAM to substitute my GTX 750 Ti. I thought I would see an increase in either fps or frame times, but in the games I tested (Rise of the Tomb Raider and GTA V), it performed worse than my previous GPU, by a significant margin. For example, at the Geothermal Valley map in RotTR, the 750 Ti managed to stay at a steady 30 fps after I set the Vsync option to Half Adaptive Vsync in the Nvidia Control Panel. The RX 460 barely manages 28 fps, and limiting fps through Radeon Settings or Riva Tuner makes no difference at all. Is it because of the AMD driver overhead? I thought the RX 460 wasn't powerful enough to be bottlenecked by the G4400, even in Medium settings at 1080p.
PS: I know people here recommended me the 1050 Ti, but I couldn't pass on the RX 460 due to it costing a bit more than half the price of the 1050 Ti.
I recently bought an Asus RX 460 Strix, with 4GB VRAM to substitute my GTX 750 Ti. I thought I would see an increase in either fps or frame times, but in the games I tested (Rise of the Tomb Raider and GTA V), it performed worse than my previous GPU, by a significant margin. For example, at the Geothermal Valley map in RotTR, the 750 Ti managed to stay at a steady 30 fps after I set the Vsync option to Half Adaptive Vsync in the Nvidia Control Panel. The RX 460 barely manages 28 fps, and limiting fps through Radeon Settings or Riva Tuner makes no difference at all. Is it because of the AMD driver overhead? I thought the RX 460 wasn't powerful enough to be bottlenecked by the G4400, even in Medium settings at 1080p.
PS: I know people here recommended me the 1050 Ti, but I couldn't pass on the RX 460 due to it costing a bit more than half the price of the 1050 Ti.