https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-960-PRO-Internal-MZ-V6P512BW/dp/B01LXS4TYB/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1489668793&sr=1-2&keywords=samsung+nvme+m.2+ssd+960
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-960-EVO-Internal-MZ-V6E500BW/dp/B01LYFKJR7/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1489668793&sr=1-1&keywords=samsung%2Bnvme%2Bm.2%2Bssd%2B960&th=1
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-950-PRO-Internal-MZ-V5P512BW/dp/B01639694M/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1489669181&sr=1-3&keywords=samsung+nvme+m.2+ssd+950+evo
For the same space, why does the 950 pro still cost more than the 960 versions? The read speeds are faster, but the site doesn't show the "Random Read/Write IOPS Performance : Up to 300K and 110K Respectively*" part that it shows for the evo 950, but do not show it for the 960 versions, and it goes up and down depending on the drive's space, for both evo and pro 950 and 960. And also for the read/write performance for the 950. The 960's it's the same except for when it's a pro or an evo, storage space doesn't matter.
So what are all the factors for the price differences for what seems to me to be the weaker product is still more costly?
Next, I have a regular ssd for my primary storage, I have an external hdd i could pretty swiftly transfer all my files to and reinstall windows 7 if i need to. But my question is, should I switch my os to run off the 960 evo nvme m.2 ssd (I already have it, i haven't installed it yet), or keep it on the ssd?
If I ran games off the ssd vs the m.2 ssd, whether primary or secondary, would there be a difference?
Lastly, for 720p-1440p video editing, rendering, etc. would any of this matter?
Thank you.
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-960-EVO-Internal-MZ-V6E500BW/dp/B01LYFKJR7/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1489668793&sr=1-1&keywords=samsung%2Bnvme%2Bm.2%2Bssd%2B960&th=1
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-950-PRO-Internal-MZ-V5P512BW/dp/B01639694M/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1489669181&sr=1-3&keywords=samsung+nvme+m.2+ssd+950+evo
For the same space, why does the 950 pro still cost more than the 960 versions? The read speeds are faster, but the site doesn't show the "Random Read/Write IOPS Performance : Up to 300K and 110K Respectively*" part that it shows for the evo 950, but do not show it for the 960 versions, and it goes up and down depending on the drive's space, for both evo and pro 950 and 960. And also for the read/write performance for the 950. The 960's it's the same except for when it's a pro or an evo, storage space doesn't matter.
So what are all the factors for the price differences for what seems to me to be the weaker product is still more costly?
Next, I have a regular ssd for my primary storage, I have an external hdd i could pretty swiftly transfer all my files to and reinstall windows 7 if i need to. But my question is, should I switch my os to run off the 960 evo nvme m.2 ssd (I already have it, i haven't installed it yet), or keep it on the ssd?
If I ran games off the ssd vs the m.2 ssd, whether primary or secondary, would there be a difference?
Lastly, for 720p-1440p video editing, rendering, etc. would any of this matter?
Thank you.