Is there something wrong here?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Faith97

Commendable
Jul 12, 2016
118
0
1,690
Hello everyone!

Today I decided to run a Time Spy benchmark, but my Graphics score is only 4137.
The average for this card is around 6000.

Is there something wrong with my system?

I am running i7 7700 with 16GB of ram.


Edit: I might have been wrong and the average is 4000, but going to leave my question here anyways because I swear I saw 6000 in some youtube videos.
 
Solution
don't be sorry your post was fine and may help inform others looking

a lot of guys see them scores but not take in mind overclocking that's why when asked on thes cards and I ust 3dmark I never use ''K'' cpus to show cards performance

looks to me your set up is on spot and a good average , you can see theres guys doing a lot worse then you as well as some a bit better but little thing as like using a OSD affects scores any background tasks running driver differences [just because its a new or older driver don't make it a better driver ] some drivers can give a fps hit and some may give a nice gain .

but looks like your in a good high middle average , and could be worse

Faith97

Commendable
Jul 12, 2016
118
0
1,690


I guess my results are normal, but I am still interested in the settings you said.
I went into bios, but I only got this option related to PCI, and I'm not sure what it is.

51J82Ws.jpg

bC8pyUj.jpg


Going to do my little research now.

 
like madmatt30 said

your in the ball park

http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/cpugpu/spy/P/2183/1096/500000?minScore=0&cpuName=Intel Core i7-7700&gpuName=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060-6GB

form them scores you got to scrool down to you find a card clocked as yours not to the top ones overclocked over 1900 MHz

then i'll bet there graphics score is on par to yours

at 1898 clock yours did a tad better then this graphics score of 4067 ???

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1338441


lot of guys look at them scores and don't take in any of the CPU or GPU overclocking that was involved to get them higher scores and for all you know them top scores you see maybe at overclocks that may not even be 24/7 stable under anything else just enugh to grab a ''bragging score'' to get posted
 

Faith97

Commendable
Jul 12, 2016
118
0
1,690


Sorry for this post then, looks like I have a bad memory, and my score is perfectly fine.

 
don't be sorry your post was fine and may help inform others looking

a lot of guys see them scores but not take in mind overclocking that's why when asked on thes cards and I ust 3dmark I never use ''K'' cpus to show cards performance

looks to me your set up is on spot and a good average , you can see theres guys doing a lot worse then you as well as some a bit better but little thing as like using a OSD affects scores any background tasks running driver differences [just because its a new or older driver don't make it a better driver ] some drivers can give a fps hit and some may give a nice gain .

but looks like your in a good high middle average , and could be worse
 
Solution

mips

Reputable
Sep 30, 2017
3
4
4,515


You are not losing your marbles, you did indeed see scores of 6000. Example https://youtu.be/dTJPp7WdEBs?t=3m27s

I suspect those scores are for an old version of timespy and 3dmark scrubbed their database of those results.

Anyway your score is accurate, overclock your GPU for better results, my Graphics Score is 4 646 but my 1060 is OCed.
 
Jul 18, 2018
1
0
10
I know topic is little OLD Faith97 but you score like 4000 and over is when ju just run 3d MARK TIME SPY, there is diffrent config.

try click for CUSTOM RUN change resolution for 1920x1080 and Demo Ram choose HIGH (2Gb and more) than you result will be close to 6500.

On my Setup
Xeon x5650 2.66ghz (6c/12T) OC`ed to 4GHZ , 16 GB DDR3 1600, and GTX1060 6GB Palit Jetstream for genuine freguency 3D MARK score was 4180, for Custom RUN res. 1920x1080 score 6516....
After OC GPU for CORE +200 and Memory +500 score 3D Mark 4630, custom run 1920x1080 score 7206
 
Status
Not open for further replies.