Normally I'd just confide in myself about this, but I'm genuinely wondering right now.. I planned to purchase the MSI GTX 1050 2GB OC from Newegg for 119.99 with 3.99 shipping, and that seemed like the best deal at the time that wasn't a single-fan mini, or a cheaper RX 460. HOWEVER, my mind changed when I saw the Gigabyte RX 460 4GB Dual Fan edition...
at the same price.
119.99, 3.99 shipping. AND 4GB of frame buffer. Now, I could go ask 'which one is better', but I know that, when equally matched, the 1050 beats the RX 460 out. However, their GDDR5 difference is enough to make me consider the RX. Should I? The price tag and increased VRAM makes me want to jump on it, but maybe someone with more logistical understanding of the cards separate architecture (Pascal vs. whatever the AMD equivalent is) and how they differentiate, and what justifies that RX's cheaper price tag.
at the same price.
119.99, 3.99 shipping. AND 4GB of frame buffer. Now, I could go ask 'which one is better', but I know that, when equally matched, the 1050 beats the RX 460 out. However, their GDDR5 difference is enough to make me consider the RX. Should I? The price tag and increased VRAM makes me want to jump on it, but maybe someone with more logistical understanding of the cards separate architecture (Pascal vs. whatever the AMD equivalent is) and how they differentiate, and what justifies that RX's cheaper price tag.