Would this gaming pc play all 1080p games at ultra settings

Oltras1234

Prominent
Feb 15, 2017
29
0
530
Graphics Card 8GB EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC
Processor Intel Core i7 7700 "Kaby Lake" 3.6GHz Quad Core with HT
System Drive 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD
Storage Drive 1TB Seagate Barracuda HDD
Motherboard Asus Prime B250 Pro
Chassis NZXT S340 Mid Tower
CPU Cooler Arctic Freezer 11
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz DDR4
Power Supply Corsair 550W VS - 80PLUS
Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64bit


The games I was wondering if it would play would be ,

Ghost recon wild lands

Dishonoured 2

Mass effect andromeda

Battlefield 1

Battlefield 4

Tom Clancy's The Division

Rust

Ark

Total War Warhammer

Player Unknowns Battlegrounds


I was wondering if all of these games could all be played at ultra above 60 fps all the time and could someone expect to tell me the fps I would get on these games at 1080p?
 
Solution
It should be just fine. The irony of 1080p gaming is that it can be more CPU intensive, especially online multiplayer games like BF1. You should average 60-90 in 1080p most of the time with some dips around 45-55 at the lowest. The PSU is cutting it close in terms of optimal usage, closer to 650-750 would be more ideal but 550 will do it. You might hear coil whine. Its well documented that going under optimal wattage can lead to that. Many, many people still using HDD's for games but I gotta tell you that with ever increasing texture packs it can take a while to load. For some its a minor thing, me I don't like waiting a minute in-between load screens and Mass Effect has a lot of them.

ledhead11

Reputable
Oct 10, 2014
585
0
5,160
It should be just fine. The irony of 1080p gaming is that it can be more CPU intensive, especially online multiplayer games like BF1. You should average 60-90 in 1080p most of the time with some dips around 45-55 at the lowest. The PSU is cutting it close in terms of optimal usage, closer to 650-750 would be more ideal but 550 will do it. You might hear coil whine. Its well documented that going under optimal wattage can lead to that. Many, many people still using HDD's for games but I gotta tell you that with ever increasing texture packs it can take a while to load. For some its a minor thing, me I don't like waiting a minute in-between load screens and Mass Effect has a lot of them.
 
Solution

Oltras1234

Prominent
Feb 15, 2017
29
0
530


If I was to go to 1440p which I can , would I get better performance?
 

Oltras1234

Prominent
Feb 15, 2017
29
0
530


I got a i7 7700k and 650w PSU for reasons of money constraints I got rid of the ssd as I can always integrate one
later
 

ledhead11

Reputable
Oct 10, 2014
585
0
5,160
I'd highly recommend going 1440p/144hz/g-sync. Sure they're a bit more expensive but well worth it if you game a lot. That 1080 should average 45-70 in more demanding situations and perhaps upwards of 80+ in less. You might need to keep AA at FXAA or off and maybe lower one or two settings but it would be a happy match. I would also try to OC that 7700k to ~4+ghz as many have. You don't need to go for a record but around 4.2-4.4 will help a bit for that multiplayer stuff. Going with the 650w psu is a perfect match.

I know I'm starting to sound like a broken record as I've said this on several threads now. If you haven't already gotten this, swapping the 1080 for a TI will leave you much happier in the long run. I have 2 1080's in SLI and my TI is only slightly slower than them. It also boosts/OC's much more efficiently than the 1080's. I'm using it for my 1440p rig(old rig listed in my profile) and its simply awesome. I can almost guarantee that anyone who has one will be happy for at least 2 years outside of potential hardware failures. I'm not saying 1080''s aren't great cards, they are and the SLI rig great for 4k gaming, but I'm really impressed by how much better the TI is.