Ryzen or i7 7700K - Which one's better for 1080p 144Hz gaming?

bazzingabear

Distinguished
Nov 4, 2013
31
2
18,545
Bought a GTX 1070 recently and am looking to upgrade my i5 4440. Shall not be doing any more upgrades for the next 3-4 years, which is why I'm looking for the best-in-class kind of upgrade right now. The i7 has better clock speeds and single-core performance, while the Ryzen has more cores which would benefit future games. I'm finding it hard to gauge if the games coming out in the next 2-3 years would really utilize all these cores and if the trade-off would really be worth it. Any inputs will be appreciated, thanks!
 
Solution

If you're talking about 4 "cores" -> then you're right, but 4 thread CPUs (as in an i5 - no hyperthreading) is starting to become a limiting factor in gaming. The Ryzen launch has shown us just how big the gap is between similarly clocked i5 & i7s on many CPU dependent games. As a point of interest, the old FX 8350 is now actually slightly faster than a 2500K, and probably roughly equivalent to a 3570K over a wide selection of games these days, despite being significantly slower when they were released. . Two years ago i3s were okay for...

maxalge

Champion
Ambassador


7700k easily


ryzen is good, just not for high refresh gaming
 

jkteddy77

Honorable
Jun 13, 2013
1,131
0
11,360




I second the i7 7700k if your main use case is gaming.

Remember they said in 2012 that games would start using the FX6300 and 8150's 6 and 8 cores.
Here we are in 2017, and only a few AAA games coming out today can fully utilize more than 4 cores.
 

If you're talking about 4 "cores" -> then you're right, but 4 thread CPUs (as in an i5 - no hyperthreading) is starting to become a limiting factor in gaming. The Ryzen launch has shown us just how big the gap is between similarly clocked i5 & i7s on many CPU dependent games. As a point of interest, the old FX 8350 is now actually slightly faster than a 2500K, and probably roughly equivalent to a 3570K over a wide selection of games these days, despite being significantly slower when they were released. . Two years ago i3s were okay for gaming, i5s were plenty and only people doing streaming or productivity workloads would be advised to get an i7, because the extra threads meant nothing for gaming. That's just not the case anymore.

Games are utilising more threads, and that trend will continue, it's just happening slowly. Having said that, there is no question that the 7700K is the premium gaming CPU right now.

OP -> remember that the much cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 costs less, can be paired with a cheaper mobo and OC'd even on the stock cooler, or with a cheap aftermarket cooler for ~200Mhz more, and games identically to any Ryzen 7. So for gaming only - don't consider the Ryzen 7, they're too expensive and no faster (for gaming). If you want to save some money a Ryzen 5 is a solid CPU, but the 7700K is better for gaming. Had you not bought your GPU already then a fairer dollar for dollar capacity would be Ryzen 5 1600 + GTX 1080 vs 7700K + GTX 1070... that's a closer decision. But given you already have the 1070, it's just a question of whether you're prepared to spend the extra cash on the superior Intel CPU.
 
Solution

jkteddy77

Honorable
Jun 13, 2013
1,131
0
11,360


Yes, I would second all of this also. I'm saying the 7700k is the best option because even though a lot of games can utilize 8 threads in some capacity (most games still cannot offload major game functions onto these other threads, most of game's main functions still have to be run on the primary 4 threads), almost no games utilize over 8 threads, meaning much of the Ryzen 7 would be unutilized, and you'd just be running 8 threads that are each individually slower than the 7700k's.
7700K is the best option if gaming is your only worry, but 1600 or 1600X are the best budget option if money is an issue, and would compete with the 4790k and 5770 in performance.