tsnor :
Brad Oxford :
Gam3r01 :
Brad Oxford :
Best not to get a dual core processor. Although most games will work decently with them, some will refuse to launch, and you'll also have to close pretty much everything, and set the game priority to High in task manager to get good performance. If you have to alt+tab for any reason, the desktop will be almost unusable given that the game will be using 95%+ of your CPU. It's best to just spend £45-50 extra, and purchase an older i5/i7, or just go with AMD. At this price point, Intel isn't good for people on a budget, as their budget CPU's aren't quite as good as AMD's budget CPU's.
You do know the G4560 has 4 threads right?
I'm aware. Threads are not the same as cores. Hyperthreading is alright, but you're still MUCH better off going with a true quad core, especially for a gaming PC. Dual core processors are fast becoming a thing of the past.
So you think an i5 is the minimum intel CPU for gaming ? i3 is a dual core with hyperthreading.
As I said, dual cores are quickly becoming a thing of the past. I'm simply recommending that OP get a quad core, since more games are making use of more than 2 cores, and some games, Far Cry 4 for example, refuse to launch at all, unless you download the dual core fix for it. There are bound to be more games like this in the future. With games that utilise 4 cores, the gains can be massive, such as 20+ FPS in FC3/4. Then there's the gains outside of gaming, such as having a game, and other windows open at the same time, faster processing for video editing, smoother VM experiences, etc. Now, do keep in mind, that if OP's cannot afford one AT ALL, then the Pentium isn't a bad choice. However, if he can squeeze just an additional £50-60 into his budget to get an i5, it'll be more than worth it, and he won't have to worry about upgrading anytime soon.