Samsung 960 Pro SSD - not getting the max speed

euorinsm

Prominent
May 29, 2017
6
0
510
Is there anyway to tell if I am getting the max speed out of my SSD? I have a feeling it's not. I double checked, I installed the nvme drivers, have the latest firmware. I have drive indexing turned off. I ran the Magician benchmark utility and for the result this is what I got:

Sequential (MB/s) Read: 2,791 Write: 1,934
Random(IOPS) Read:338,080 Write: 338,892
attachment.php

Can anyone check to see if its normal?
 
Solution


That MB supports all current NVME drives. Anyway, besides trying a PCIe M.2 adapter you may want to uninstall then reinstall the NVME driver from Samsung and see if that helps.

Richard_253

Prominent
May 28, 2017
19
0
520


The Samsung Magician performance test has been extremely inconsistent and unreliable. Suggest you test with Crystal DisKMark. For less inflated results (and maybe more accurate) try AS SSD Benchmark.
 

Richard_253

Prominent
May 28, 2017
19
0
520


That seems pretty close to Samsung's speed claims. The difference is negligible:

960 PRO
Form Factor
M.2
Capacity
512 GB, 1024 GB, 2048 GB
Sequential Read Speed
Max 3,500 MB/sec
Sequential Write Speed
Max 2,100 MB/sec
 

euorinsm

Prominent
May 29, 2017
6
0
510
I know i'm probably asking for too much, but I still think that score could be improved a little bit. I seen some people who've had a higher score than I do, and my hardware is really good. Can there be something else I'm missing?
 

Karadjgne

Titan
Ambassador
Size of the drive vrs what's actually used, if the drive is more than 1/2 full, expect a little slow down. Motherboard capability and performance. Some mobo's simply don't quite live upto full performance claims, they might be 98% capable, which is close enough. But that 2% will show up in your benchmark as slightly slower speeds. NVMe and mobo drivers the same, might not be a full 100% optimized, might be only 98% optimized, so benchmark is affected.

Your speeds are close enough to Samsung ability that it honestly makes 0 difference to anything but a benchmark. On something like a 1hr run stress bench, you'd see a few seconds at most difference
 

Richard_253

Prominent
May 28, 2017
19
0
520


The only thing that I can suggest is if using a built in M.2 slot on your MB, instead try a PCIe M.2 adapter card.

I am using one for my 960 EVO 250GB boot drive and getting Samsung stated speeds (btw, the 960 EVO costs much less, ~$130, than the 960 Pro and offers just about the same speeds):

i9kIVT.jpg
 

euorinsm

Prominent
May 29, 2017
6
0
510
Yeah that's really strange, you have the EVO version and your scores are a little better than mine even though I have the faster version. I don't have an M.2 adapter to test it , but my I know my motherboard is capable of those speeds. And here is my motherboard btw:
http://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/GA-X99-Ultra-Gaming-rev-10#ov

On their M.2 support list you'll see it has the 950 Pro on there , but i guess they didn't update it for the 960.
 

Richard_253

Prominent
May 28, 2017
19
0
520


That MB supports all current NVME drives. Anyway, besides trying a PCIe M.2 adapter you may want to uninstall then reinstall the NVME driver from Samsung and see if that helps.
 
Solution