AARRGGHHH :
I'm not familiar with MegaBytesPerSecond versus RevolutionsPerMinute, how do they compare?
Thanks!
So you understand that a HDD is made up of platters which store magnetic charges. A "head" hovers above each platter and reads or writes data (reading or writing magnetic charges) to the platter. The head is on an actuator arm which swings in and out, while the platter itself spins. The combination of the spinning platter and swinging actuator makes it possible for the single head to access any portion of the platter.
Here's a more detailed overview if you're interested:
http://www.explainthatstuff.com/harddrive.html
In any case, the faster the platter is spinning, i.e. the higher its RPM, then the more of each platter will be passing under the drive head per second, potentially allowing the drive to read and write data more quickly.
The relationship between RPM and MBps is really only a general one. Different drives have different density, as in they store more (or less) data in the same area. So a slower spinning drive with higher density may still be able to read and write faster. The number of platters can also vary, the amount of cache, etc, etc. All these things can impact on drive speed too. So a 7200RPM drive is not necessarily faster than a 5400RPM one. It's a particularly poor metric if you're comparing old vs new drives.
If you're only comparing new drives, it is actually fairly representative though. That's primarily because faster RPM drives tend to be a little more complex (= more expensive) to produce and are less power efficient. For that reason the 7200RPM drives are usually engineered from the ground up to be the higher spec, better performing and more expensive drives.
There's no question though that if you're connecting it to a USB2 interface, just get a cheap drive and be done with it.