Gam3r01 :
Dont bother with watercooling on it. You realistically are not thermally limited with modern cards, and you would never get your moneys worth out of it.
Invest it in a new monitor, SSD, or whatever (or save it).
This is categorically untrue. With Pascal, temps are EVERYTHING. The lower the temps, the higher they'll boost, and the better they'll run.
content edited out by rubix_1011
mac_angel :
I picked up an Asus Strix GTX 1080ti OC last week. Messing around with Afterburner, I was a little sad to find I could only O/C by 75MHz, no matter what voltage I threw at it (power and temp sliders are at max). But playing in game, I noticed that I'm averaging about 2015MHz stable @ 55*C. From what I keep finding online, it seems like that's really good. Before I bought the card I was planning on getting a watercooler down the road for it to get a bit more speed out of it, but so far, from what I find online, I probably won't get much more to make it worth while. I don't think it's worth it unless I get +200MHz. Anyone else have any input?
First, yes, watercooling will help. It may not yield a lot in terms of extra performance, that will depend on the GPU itself, how well the loop performs and how low the ambient temps are (your room temp). Where you'll definitely see improvement, is in the downclocking / downvolting that happens with boost 3.0. The lower temps will allow for the GPU to not have to downclock / downvolt, meaning you'll be able to maintain clocks a lot better, and for a lot longer.
I see you're playing with the voltage / frequency curve. Good. Keep playing. Find a clock you want, and run it at the lowest voltage possible. Can also try a more aggressive curve, like pictured below. Just remember, when running at the maximum voltage (1.093v), you're going to be creating a lot of extra heat, so keeping the GPU cool is an absolute must.
content edited out by rubix_1011