is there any problem in terms of performance in heavy application, games, or 3d benchmarks? if there is no problem then i think just ignore that, and i think what it means by perform poorly is the performance compared to other faster ram, but i also dont know, for sure 1600 mhz is not that fast compared to ddr4 ram nowadays that is clocked pretty high
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). Also 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz. Your system must have been running some intensive applications while you were performing the test.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). Also 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz. Your system must have been running some intensive applications while you were performing the test.
is there any problem in terms of performance in heavy application, games, or 3d benchmarks? if there is no problem then i think just ignore that, and i think what it means by perform poorly is the performance compared to other faster ram, but i also dont know, for sure 1600 mhz is not that fast compared to ddr4 ram nowadays that is clocked pretty high
Before my ram performance tanked i was getting 60 fps on games like overwatch easily, now it staggers around 40fps
is there any problem in terms of performance in heavy application, games, or 3d benchmarks? if there is no problem then i think just ignore that, and i think what it means by perform poorly is the performance compared to other faster ram, but i also dont know, for sure 1600 mhz is not that fast compared to ddr4 ram nowadays that is clocked pretty high
Before my ram performance tanked i was getting 60 fps on games like overwatch easily, now it staggers around 40fps
do you have any background application that waste bunch of ram and high cpu usage? because that can cause some performance impact