Raid Controller and SSD drives

RoyTr80

Prominent
Jul 19, 2017
3
0
510
Hey Guys,

I want to buy RAID controller and the appropriate SSD drives for my PowerEdge R900. Which one do I buy ? Am confused with all the data on the Internet.

Roy
 
Solution
You appear to be talking about RAID1. In that system, all the data are written to TWO places (separate drive units) simultaneously. If either of them fails individually, the system can alert you to that failure and keep on running from the remaining good unit until you can replace the failed unit. Then it can restore the RAID array by copying all data from the remaining good unit to the new replacement.

RAID1 is ideal for applications where users cannot tolerate significant downtime during normal operations, but some scheduled downtime for repairs is acceptable at other times. For example, I use a RAID1 system in Point-of-Sale application in our retail store where computer failure would be a major disruption. But any repairs can be...

Paperdoc

Polypheme
Ambassador
If your plan is to get super-fast performance by using a RAID0 array of SSD's, you may be wasting your money. The advantages (by performance speed) of a RAID0 array originally was mainly due to the realities of mechanical hard drives - particularly, the time delays for head movement and disk rotation. Splitting the data over 2 HDD units means that these delays can be cut almost in half if the staggered use of the drives can be synchronized. But virtually ALL of that source of delay in data access is GONE with SSD's - there are NO moving parts, and the electronic circuits respond HUGELY faster than a mechanical HDD. So the benefit of staggering access to two separate storage devices is extremely small.
 

Eximo

Titan
Ambassador
SSDs are essentially RAID devices themselves, their massive throughput comes from having an array of flash chips.

There are tangible benefits to using two SATA SSDs as long as you can reach high queue depths. That is a cheap solution that can get you around 800MB/s. If you need more than that, PCIe and PCIe M.2 SSDs go about as fast as you can get and RAID is basically pointless. Though I understand you can still do software raid if you wanted to, but unless your workload is very extreme it is likely a waste of cash.

If you are doing serious work, consider an enterprise class PCIe SSD with provisioning.
 

t53186

Distinguished


What is the service tag on the R900 please?
 

RoyTr80

Prominent
Jul 19, 2017
3
0
510


3QYY6J1

 

RoyTr80

Prominent
Jul 19, 2017
3
0
510


I need it not for RAID 0, but redundancy. Agree that the speed will come from moving to SSD’s, still need redundancy so data will not be lost if something crashes.
 

Paperdoc

Polypheme
Ambassador
You appear to be talking about RAID1. In that system, all the data are written to TWO places (separate drive units) simultaneously. If either of them fails individually, the system can alert you to that failure and keep on running from the remaining good unit until you can replace the failed unit. Then it can restore the RAID array by copying all data from the remaining good unit to the new replacement.

RAID1 is ideal for applications where users cannot tolerate significant downtime during normal operations, but some scheduled downtime for repairs is acceptable at other times. For example, I use a RAID1 system in Point-of-Sale application in our retail store where computer failure would be a major disruption. But any repairs can be done when the store is closed.

RAID1 is NOT! a backup system! If any actions - mistakes by operators, bad incoming data, malware, etc. - write faulty data or delete data from the RAID1 array, it happens to BOTH disks simultaneously and there is NO un-corrupted data to recover. Of course, if both disk units suffer failures, or if the computer or its RAID controller subsytem fail, you lose access to the data and MAY not be able to re-access it. Your posts suggest your main concern is complete loss of data from a "crash". RAID1 does not give you sufficient protection from failures of that type. For that you need a proper BACKUP system and procedures, not RAID1. For example, I worked in a large facility with professional data centre management that experienced a failure of their RAID5 array. Now that is a RAID variety that can keep running and rebuild itself automatically during normal operations when one of the member disk units fails and is replaced. This particular system experienced TWO disk unit failures, and could not rebuild itself. After the failed units were replaced, the entire data set had to be restored from BACKUPS. The staff had TWO backup systems in use - one stored on-site, one stored off-site - so the restore could be done with VERY little loss of data from a portion of the last day before the failure. I know another similar business whose data centre was in a basement location (relatively common, oddly) that was flooded. For them, on-site storage of backups might have been a disaster!

So, review your real requirements and, if appropriate, look into proper data backup systems.

IF you need RAID in whatever flavour, examine your Dell PowerEdge 900 system carefully. My look at their website says that unit comes with a Dell PERC 6i SAS 6/iR or PERC 6/E RAID controller and management system capable of a LOT of good RAID work. To some extent the exact details depend on the specific model number of your PowerEdge 900 system and of the particular RAID controller system it has. But one important feature is this. That computer system is designed to allow you to use a variety of Operating Systems. Usually when you use a RAID controller and management system the device drivers and the software versions depend on what OS is in use. The Dell system HAS those drivers and utilities included, making it much easier to use for most applications of that system.
 
Solution