GTX 1070 SC bottlenecked?
- Thread starter Ompted
- Start date
Solution
Bottlenecked from the CPU or resolution? The CPU preforms about the same in games as a i7 7700K if you are running 2400 DDR3. 1333 / 1600 takes a massive hit so that will impact the FPS. But really it depends on what resolution your playing at, the game and the graphical settings.
derekullo
Splendid
- Jan 25, 2009
- 2,647
- 292
- 22,190
The geforce 1080 gets 131 fps in Rainbow Six Siege @ 2560x1600 on ultra.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1174-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080/page6.html
So 110 fps for a Geforce 1070 sounds about right if that's your resolution.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1174-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080/page6.html
So 110 fps for a Geforce 1070 sounds about right if that's your resolution.
- May 31, 2015
- 36
- 0
- 18,530
The problem is the I'm running 1920x1080. I see people with lesser builds then mine and get more fps. I have DDR3 2x8. I am looking into DDR 4. My poblem is that its SC. Which means I get about 2000 boost clock and still get that fps. Will DDR 4 help fix the problem, or no.
Yeah DDR4 will require a new socket, motherboard and CPU. Like I said before if you don't have 2400 DDR3 Ram, than pick some up. it will be cheaper than getting a new system and you will get the same FPS.
but when comparing 4790K to a 7700K, 2400 DDR3 makes up for being an older generation (In games).
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/
but when comparing 4790K to a 7700K, 2400 DDR3 makes up for being an older generation (In games).
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/
derekullo
Splendid
- Jan 25, 2009
- 2,647
- 292
- 22,190
Go reread
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/5.htm
And focus on the average fps:
In Metro 2033: Redux you gained an entire 4 fps going from 1333 to 2400
in Warhammer 40,000 you gained 5 fps going from 1333 to 2400
In Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands you gain 0.05 going from 1333 to 2400.
And the above was a best case scenario using DDR3.
Using ddr4 it gets even tighter
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/3.htm
In Metro 2033: Redux you gained 0.7 fps going from 2133 to 3200
in Warhammer 40,000 you gained 0.8 fps going from 2133 to 3200
In Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands you actually lost 0.06 fps going from 2133 to 3200.
Ghost Recon doesn't appear to care at all about the ram speed.
0.06 fps is within the margin of error.
Just to recap as I said before;
Games using Intel cpu's don't respond drastically to an increase in ram speed.
For Ryzen it's a different story though.
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/5.htm
And focus on the average fps:
In Metro 2033: Redux you gained an entire 4 fps going from 1333 to 2400
in Warhammer 40,000 you gained 5 fps going from 1333 to 2400
In Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands you gain 0.05 going from 1333 to 2400.
And the above was a best case scenario using DDR3.
Using ddr4 it gets even tighter
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/memory_speed_vs_performance_intel/3.htm
In Metro 2033: Redux you gained 0.7 fps going from 2133 to 3200
in Warhammer 40,000 you gained 0.8 fps going from 2133 to 3200
In Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands you actually lost 0.06 fps going from 2133 to 3200.
Ghost Recon doesn't appear to care at all about the ram speed.
0.06 fps is within the margin of error.
Just to recap as I said before;
Games using Intel cpu's don't respond drastically to an increase in ram speed.
For Ryzen it's a different story though.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
Question PC stutters and massive FPS drops on every game.- Started by NovemberRaiN404
- Replies: 11
-
-
News Firefox user loses 7,470 opened tabs saved over two years after they can’t restore browsing session- Started by Admin
- Replies: 58
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram