I've always criticized this processor due to its terrible value.
The big majority of the people can just get away with the R7 1700 and OC it to 3.5-3.6 GHz to match 1700X/1800X's clock speeds for a portion of the price.
In a nutshell the 1800X is poor value just like any top-of-the line CPU and it is more consumism or wanting to have the best than it is anything else.
They call them "enthusiasts" sometimes.
But I know that OC can affect overall system stability and people that use it for a workstation are very concerned about that.
So the question is
Is it very possible to have that kind of issues by OCing the 1700 to 3.5-3.6 GHz?
Aren't they the exact same chip but the 1800x is "factory-overclocked" so to speak?
Is the 1800X really better binned than the 1700?
If it is just a gimmick and you can perfecly OC a 1700 even in workstation use then the 1800X is just marketing right?
The big majority of the people can just get away with the R7 1700 and OC it to 3.5-3.6 GHz to match 1700X/1800X's clock speeds for a portion of the price.
In a nutshell the 1800X is poor value just like any top-of-the line CPU and it is more consumism or wanting to have the best than it is anything else.
They call them "enthusiasts" sometimes.
But I know that OC can affect overall system stability and people that use it for a workstation are very concerned about that.
So the question is
Is it very possible to have that kind of issues by OCing the 1700 to 3.5-3.6 GHz?
Aren't they the exact same chip but the 1800x is "factory-overclocked" so to speak?
Is the 1800X really better binned than the 1700?
If it is just a gimmick and you can perfecly OC a 1700 even in workstation use then the 1800X is just marketing right?