Hi all,
So I build this system yesterday and I am trying to push the CPU as far as possible using around 1.3500 Volts (I want it to be a long term overclock, with a long CPU lifespan).
I set the clock to 3.875GHz without problem... I only noticed something: When putting the voltage on 'manual' mode (on 1.3500 Volts), I only get 1.545 (1.6GHz). What I did to solve this is put it on 'offset' mode and then it would just did an offset of +0.1185 so it would reach around 1.3500 Volts.
Now that I had fixed that, I ran Cinebench. With 3.9 GHz, Cinebench would crash on the first try.
But putting my clocking frequency on anything below that, (even 3.825 or 3.850 Volts), it would crash the THIRD time and I do not know why. Is it because of a bug or is it just not stable? I ran AIDA64 for half an hour without experiencing problems so am I just running it not too long enough?
Should I give my CPU more Voltage/lower clock frequency, or is it just some bug which I can ignore in Cinebench? Because the first two runs in Cinebench work perfectly fine with my CPU on 3.875 GHz and I got 1276cb score out of it VS. the standard (before overclocking) 1125cb score.
So, is my system just stable and is it just a bug that Cinebench R15.0 crashes on the third run? Or is it not stable?
Kind regards,
Vincent Stoter
Edit: suddenly AIDA64 indicates a "Hardware failure detected" and stops the stresstest. I have no idea why my system is not completely stable
https://imgur.com/a/qicov and https://imgur.com/a/xGC6L
PC specs:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Boxed
AOC G2460VQ6
ASUS Prime X370-Pro
Corsair RM550x
Corsair Strafe MX Brown
Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 16GB DDR4-3000 CL15 kit
Crucial MX300 275GB (M.2)
EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 SC 3GB
Fractal Design Meshify C Tempered Glass edition
Seagate BarraCuda New 2TB
So I build this system yesterday and I am trying to push the CPU as far as possible using around 1.3500 Volts (I want it to be a long term overclock, with a long CPU lifespan).
I set the clock to 3.875GHz without problem... I only noticed something: When putting the voltage on 'manual' mode (on 1.3500 Volts), I only get 1.545 (1.6GHz). What I did to solve this is put it on 'offset' mode and then it would just did an offset of +0.1185 so it would reach around 1.3500 Volts.
Now that I had fixed that, I ran Cinebench. With 3.9 GHz, Cinebench would crash on the first try.
But putting my clocking frequency on anything below that, (even 3.825 or 3.850 Volts), it would crash the THIRD time and I do not know why. Is it because of a bug or is it just not stable? I ran AIDA64 for half an hour without experiencing problems so am I just running it not too long enough?
Should I give my CPU more Voltage/lower clock frequency, or is it just some bug which I can ignore in Cinebench? Because the first two runs in Cinebench work perfectly fine with my CPU on 3.875 GHz and I got 1276cb score out of it VS. the standard (before overclocking) 1125cb score.
So, is my system just stable and is it just a bug that Cinebench R15.0 crashes on the third run? Or is it not stable?
Kind regards,
Vincent Stoter
Edit: suddenly AIDA64 indicates a "Hardware failure detected" and stops the stresstest. I have no idea why my system is not completely stable
https://imgur.com/a/qicov and https://imgur.com/a/xGC6L
PC specs:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Boxed
AOC G2460VQ6
ASUS Prime X370-Pro
Corsair RM550x
Corsair Strafe MX Brown
Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 16GB DDR4-3000 CL15 kit
Crucial MX300 275GB (M.2)
EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 SC 3GB
Fractal Design Meshify C Tempered Glass edition
Seagate BarraCuda New 2TB