660ti vs 770 vs 690 for video editing and 3d

galli345

Prominent
Sep 14, 2017
2
0
510
Hi guys, im upgrading my pc for video editing on premiere/after effects and now im studyng c4d so i want to have a real good pc to work comfortable.

my actual pc is a m5a78lm usb3
fx8320 v core 1.2
8gb ram 1333 (2x4)
2 ssd 120gb and 3hdd 7200rpm
gtx650 1gb
2 monitors 1 full hd 24 ips and 1 tv 32 hd.

i want to upgrade in this order
gpu>mob +cpu ryzen 1700x>16gb ddr4>ssd evo>10bit screen

y work in premiere with so mutch video tracks at the same time, on hd resolution or full hd and with 120fps on a 24fps timeline with many effects too(red giant, transitions, and denoise), so i need too work smootly without desactivate or delete the videos at any time, and i dont really know if with more cuda cores i gonna get better result

for the future in c4d, i plain to use the new gpu render its come on r19 an then move to redshift.

i dont have so mutch money so this are my options:

660ti at(1334 cuda) :88 usd
gtx770(1536): 144usd
gtc690(3072 cuda) waterblock: 240usd

i want to know if the difference of the 3 gpu and cores will affect so mutch on my workflow and future render, especially on mi premiere workflow.

this are my options in my country, all gpus used.
 
Solution
First thing I'd do is check Adobe's site for their hardware recommendations, since you know what software you'll be using. Also, check the websites of the companies behind the plugins you're using. You are right that trying to scrub forward and back in real time while all effects are displayed can utilize a lot of resources. My bet is once you reach a certain level though, you won't need more videocard power. I'd be surprised if the 770 isn't enough.
In video rendering, the cpu matters more than gpu. Any gpu will perform similarly as long as you have one. 690 will be the fastest out of the group as its pretty much two 680s in sli. It does eat a lot of power and won't really help in rendering, just in gaming.
 

galli345

Prominent
Sep 14, 2017
2
0
510


i dont really care so mutch about rendering on premiere, the most important for me is handling well the preview playback on timeline with alot of tracks and effects.
 
First thing I'd do is check Adobe's site for their hardware recommendations, since you know what software you'll be using. Also, check the websites of the companies behind the plugins you're using. You are right that trying to scrub forward and back in real time while all effects are displayed can utilize a lot of resources. My bet is once you reach a certain level though, you won't need more videocard power. I'd be surprised if the 770 isn't enough.
 
Solution