Will Ryzen 7 1700 bottelneck the 1060 6GB

Nikhil_sood

Prominent
Jul 19, 2017
37
0
540
The question is straight.
Will anything be bottlenecked in current configuration.
Ryzen 7 1700
16 GB DDR4 2666Mhz Ram
256 GB SSD
GTX 1060 6GB
2TB WD Blue HDD
 
Solution
An R7 1700 and GTX 1060 6 GB will work perfectly fine together.

The question should be rephrased as, does the performance of a GTX 1060 6 GB pair well with the performance of a Ryzen R7 1700, and the answer to that would be yes.

Can you do better? Yes. That CPU can run faster graphics cards if you want. That's up to what you're willing to spend, and you might take into consideration the screen you're planning to output to, as it may limit whether you can even get significant benefit from the amount of rendering that can be done by the card.

There is always a bottleneck in computing, otherwise you would achieve infinite performance, or in the case of games, infinite frames per second.

In gaming, this is usually either caused by the...

ComputerGeek21

Honorable
Aug 5, 2017
564
0
11,160
yes there will be a bottle neck. according to a program i'm using (not sure how reliable yet) it said you'll have a 17% bottle neck percentage. this is because your gpu is too weak/slow. i suggest getting a slower processor and saving some money while losing almost no performance OR upgrading your gpu to a gtx 1080 or 1080 ti which would be better
 
An R7 1700 and GTX 1060 6 GB will work perfectly fine together.

The question should be rephrased as, does the performance of a GTX 1060 6 GB pair well with the performance of a Ryzen R7 1700, and the answer to that would be yes.

Can you do better? Yes. That CPU can run faster graphics cards if you want. That's up to what you're willing to spend, and you might take into consideration the screen you're planning to output to, as it may limit whether you can even get significant benefit from the amount of rendering that can be done by the card.

There is always a bottleneck in computing, otherwise you would achieve infinite performance, or in the case of games, infinite frames per second.

In gaming, this is usually either caused by the CPU or the GPU, but there are still cases when it's caused by neither. Whether it's the CPU or the GPU depends both on the speed of your CPU and GPU, and on the software or game you are running. The best you can do is shoot for a reasonably balanced combination of CPU and GPU, but even then, depending on the software you run, or the settings you run that software at, the bottleneck will shift back and forth from one to the other.

Starting your build with a good CPU will allow you in the future to upgrade your graphics card and realize some decent gains in performance, while the same holds true of building with a better graphics card than CPU.

A 1080 or 1080 Ti would be fine if the OP wants to up his budget significantly. 1070's are also good cards, if you could find one that the price hasn't been inflated out of proportion too badly on.

Same goes for an RX Vega 56. A good card, but stuck with a bad price, and further inflated by market shortages.
 
Solution

ComputerGeek21

Honorable
Aug 5, 2017
564
0
11,160
i would disagree. the R7 1700 with the 1060 6gb has a 17% bottleneck which is quite high in comparison to the bottleneck achieved by having a gtx 1080 (2%). your right in the respect that there will always be a bottleneck but he could save some money on a slightly worse core while not losing any visible gaming performance.
 
I'm going to have to disagree with you, as respectfully as I can, but...

That site is about as useful as sites that claim to calculate wattage requirements for power supplies. If you have no idea, yes, it can put you somewhere in the ballpark, but did you even read the fine print on the results it spat out?

This result is based on average CPU and GPU usage from different programs and games. It changes based on operating system, background processes activity and targeted applications. This result is not universal and changes from program to program.
The site also lists three graphics cards to pair with the R7 1700 CPU, the lowest priced of the three starting at over $700 US. That's a pretty stupid recommendation, as the R7 is basically the least of the R7 CPUs, which should be an indication that somebody is looking for decent performance, but not the absolute most expensive.

The site further states:
Everything over 10% is considered as bottleneck.
While it may be technically true that 10% or above is a bottleneck, so is .001% - 9%. The site makers simply picked an arbitrary number to use, as there is no set standard for amount of performance difference constituting an official bottleneck, other than the performance difference itself. It's up to each individual to decide whether the difference is reasonable.
 

Nikhil_sood

Prominent
Jul 19, 2017
37
0
540
Thx for the answers you all submitted. I do understand that if I go for 1070 or 1080 the performance and the bottlenecking will be much lower, but as my budget stats right now the 1070 and 1080 both are out of budget because of similar prices. Moreover the RX Vega line is good but the power consumption is far more than the performance.
I just wanted a computer for editing and streaming games on 1080p. Currently my pockets don' allow me to go for 2K or 4K.
Moreover I think its sensible to draw more power and performance from GPU rather than CPU because of the price factor. We all spend more on GPU's rather than CPU's.

Thx both of you for helping me.