Is the FX Series becoming weak?

lukemabey81

Prominent
Sep 12, 2017
17
0
520
This is just a general question. Me and my friend have an FX 6300 we both have two different opinions. I say the processor is becoming a bit weak and that it is about time to upgrade or soon at least to a Ryzen. He says that it is fine and with a 1060 6gb you will be fine. Now with a decent graphics card he is not wrong. But I say the single core performance is slow, a little over five years old it's about time to upgrade. What do you guys think? Is it time to upgrade? And why do you thing that? Thanks!
 
Solution


You are right, the 6300 by now is getting more than just a bit weak. That is of course depending what you do with it.
Recently I forced myself to upgrade from a i7 3770 to a 7700k. I suspected that the 3770 is causing slow frames...

DSzymborski

Curmudgeon Pursuivant
Moderator


It's been slow for awhile as the FX series was always a bit disappointing. Whether it's time to upgrade depends on whether the PC meets your needs; disappointing doesn't mean you can't get a lot of good use out of one. But just speaking personally, if I had an FX 6300, I would've upgraded a couple of years ago, I imagine.
 
FX are pretty weak to begin with, AMD focus so much on the core count that the single core performance become lacking [against intel counterparts] which means it's pretty bad in terms of gaming performance, unless the game utilize multithreading...

but even if they are bad, doesn't mean that they are not capable, my friend had a FX 8320 overclocked with a 1070 and he plays just fine, at least till his CPU dies and then he replace it with a i7 7700 :)

my suggestion though is to keep the FX for a while longer. Next year, AMD is doing a refresh on their Zen with the so called "pinnacle ridge" [Zen+] if i'm not wrong, and will also release a few new series of mobo [still uses AM4], so u might be better off with waiting a few more months, after all the rig that u have now is still balance and decent enough to run most games nowdays at modest setting :D
 

gaborbarla

Distinguished


You are right, the 6300 by now is getting more than just a bit weak. That is of course depending what you do with it.
Recently I forced myself to upgrade from a i7 3770 to a 7700k. I suspected that the 3770 is causing slow frames in PUBG for me. I had a GTX1080 and still suffered with slow frames and sometimes it was downright irritating especially during close quarters gunfights. With the 7700k the performance went up by about 50% but even more importantly those pesky Minimum frames (massive frame drops) have mostly disappeared. They still are present at times but 95% less.

This is a comparison of the AMD 6300 to my old i7 3770
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-3770-vs-AMD-FX-6300/1979vs1555

This is a comparison to the 7700k
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-FX-6300/3647vs1555
and the new 8700k (which I would reccomend)
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-AMD-FX-6300/3937vs1555

OR
If you dont want to pay so much you could go for the new i3 which has 4 Cores and 4 threads at 4Ghz.
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-8350K-vs-AMD-FX-6300/3935vs1555

If you upgrade go with the new architecture. You can also consider Ryzen but I love the single core performance of the intel chips currently.

Gabor
 
Solution


except that PUBG is pretty unoptimized, so i don't think that would be a good example... even most high end system can still struggle in that game

u can feel the upgrade because your 3770 is a locked CPU, which is limiting the lifespan of your system pretty good [in terms of "futureproof], if u ask around, most people can testify that a i7 3770k [yes, the K version, the i7 3770 might be struggling much more since it's locked] can still be pretty decent even for today's gaming, OP's FX however, is an unlocked CPU to begin with, he can OC it lessen up the bottleneck and adding extra lifespan for his system, at least till the promised CPU [like the already announced Zen+ and Cannonlake] comes up

of course, i agree to a certain extend, FX are bad, especially for gaming, but with the upcoming architecture refresh like Zen+ and Cannonlake, and also depending on his other parts, the games he playes, settings he uses and such, FX might still be enough

and if he's willing to hold on with it for a while [which, imho, he should], he can at least wait till prices become stable, stock starting to flood the market [instead of the scarcity we're having right now], and also, better performance with the upcoming refreshes and such :)
 
It really depends on the game ofc, some games require strong per-core performance and so the FX series will struggle.

You'd think that might be less of an issue with more modern games, but then we still see the likes of PUBG - which needs something like a 6700k or 7700k to get the best out of it.

So as mentioned above, a G4560 (with a stronger per-core performance) can match/beat an FX8350 - under certain games/conditions.
 

lukemabey81

Prominent
Sep 12, 2017
17
0
520