16gb dual channel 800mhz vs 8gb dual channel 1600mhz

thunderslainer

Prominent
Oct 24, 2017
2
0
510
Hi i would like to know whats better for my system 8gb 1600mhz in dual channel or 16gb 800mhz.

Specs:
Mobo:ASRock B85M
Gpu:MSI Nvidia GTX 1070
PSU:corsair rm650x 650 W
CPU: Intel core i7-4770
 
Solution
I didn't word that very good, but basically just remember that DUAL CHANNEL provides 2x the bandwidth to the CPU.

The data is simply SPLIT between the two sticks so you can access it up to 2x as quickly as a single stick would allow. So again, 800MHz shown likely indicates a single stick only.

You can see benefits in some situations above even 2133MHz Dual Channel, so you definitely would benefit above "800MHz" since it only provides ONE THIRD the bandwidth of a 2400MHz Dual Channel kit.

MOST games and applications won't see much benefit above 1600MHz Dual Channel though.

(I don't like how memory is labeled as "1600MHz" but then reported as "800MHz" in some applications as it gets a bit confusing. So again ignore all that and just...

luketexas

Honorable
Sep 14, 2015
252
1
10,965
Hi, first of all where have you seen 800mhz RAM advertised? Windows will show your 1600MHz RAM operating at about 800MHz, but 800MHz RAM hasn't existed since DDR2..
The faster the RAM speed, the better. Your system supports DDR3/DD3L 1600/1333/1066 non-ECC, un-buffered memory upto 16GB capacity.
If you need 16GB, then get 16GB @ 1333 or 1600 MHz. If only 8GB then get 8GB RAM @ 1333 or 1600MHz. The faster the speed, in theory the faster the RAM operates.
 

thunderslainer

Prominent
Oct 24, 2017
2
0
510


Oh really ? So my windows is showing me that i have 800 mhz but i actually have 1600?
 

luketexas

Honorable
Sep 14, 2015
252
1
10,965
Yes, this is most likely the case! What's your RAM's current memory size? If you find Windows is utilizing majority of your memory most of the time then it could be worth upgrading to the next size up ie. 4GB to 8GB, 8GB to 16GB.
 


Do you have a SINGLE STICK of memory?

A "1600MHz" stick of memory provides only HALF the bandwidth of memory to the CPU that a "1600MHz" kit does with two sticks of memory that are setup in Dual Channel.

If you have a single stick you should get another, IDENTICAL stick of memory then see the motherboard manual for the correct slots to use with two sticks.

CPUZ (from CPUID) for example on my system (2133MHz DDR3 memory) shows:

Memory-> Channel-> DUAL, and
Memory-> Dram Frequency-> 1067MHz

That is correct as it's reporting one stick. If it reported SINGLE though then adding another stick would again double the memory bandwidth (and "800MHz" is not enough for an i7-4770 in many situations).

Task Manager in Windows however shows 2133MHz. Also correct as it's reporting a different way. (though I bought another 2x4GB kit for a different PC of the EXACT same model but at different time and Windows shows 1866MHz even though it's actually 2133Mhz and tests show it's 2133MHz.)
 
I didn't word that very good, but basically just remember that DUAL CHANNEL provides 2x the bandwidth to the CPU.

The data is simply SPLIT between the two sticks so you can access it up to 2x as quickly as a single stick would allow. So again, 800MHz shown likely indicates a single stick only.

You can see benefits in some situations above even 2133MHz Dual Channel, so you definitely would benefit above "800MHz" since it only provides ONE THIRD the bandwidth of a 2400MHz Dual Channel kit.

MOST games and applications won't see much benefit above 1600MHz Dual Channel though.

(I don't like how memory is labeled as "1600MHz" but then reported as "800MHz" in some applications as it gets a bit confusing. So again ignore all that and just concentrate on whether it's DUAL CHANNEL or not and at least rated at 1600Mhz)
 
Solution
D

Deleted member 217926

Guest


That's not right at all.

It's reporting as 800 because it's DDR or double data rate. All DDR RAM sends information on both the rising and falling edges of the clock cycle. RAM is sold at the effective speed which is double the actual speed. Thus DDR3 1600 runs at and is read as 800Mhz but the effective speed is 1600Mts which is how it's sold. CPU-Z reads actual speed.


You're confusing dual channel with DDR or double data rate. Dual channel does indeed double the potential bandwidth available. In the real world this equates to a 5-10% increase in overall system speeds. Dual channel does not change the way the speed is read in any way. 1 stick, 2 sticks, 3 sticks or 4 sticks of DDR3 1600 reads as 800Mhz in CPU-Z because that's the actual speed.

 
D

Deleted member 217926

Guest


Yes. :)