(Upgrading/Sidegrading to) SSD vs SSHD

Mathias_8

Commendable
Apr 8, 2016
58
0
1,640
Hello,

so I use an old external 1TB HDD in addition to my 1TB WD Blue main drive. Yesterday I noticed a kind of rattling sound from the external drive and thought I should better get a new drive soon.

Now I see myself before the option of getting a SSHD with the same size or an SSD with at least 160GB, while I'm still looking for good prices for that one, and maybe in addition to that a smaller normal HDD.

The SSD would be used for the main partition to speed up Windows and it would get me free 244GB from the old partition in return (with a few from what is free on the SDD).

I know what you're thinking, but the SSHD can't be underestimated. First off, it's cheaper and not over my budget. But that's not my main point.

It would also be a real upgrade for several reasons:
It would be internal, instead of external. That means many games would load much quicker than they did so far from the external HDD. And it would be a full replacement of 1TB. And its Cache function would probably speed up Windows-bootup and standard programs close to an SSD.

Not only is a single SSD with about 240GB more expensive than a 1TB SSHD, but I would have to get an additional normal HDD for about 30€ instead of paying once, and this would still probably leave me little short of 1TB.

What do you think?


Also, what SSD brand would you rather recommend, Kingston or SanDisk?
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator


What do you mean "on offer"?
Is that really the only two choices you have in your market?

Which specific models of those two?
 

Mathias_8

Commendable
Apr 8, 2016
58
0
1,640
It's what I can get for around 75€, partly with coupon. Ands 70€ is pretty much the best price, even on ebay.
Kingston:
https://geizhals.de/kingston-a400-ssd-240gb-sa400s37-240g-a1616800.html

Two Intensos:
https://geizhals.de/intenso-top-iii-ssd-256gb-3812440-a840395.html?hloc=at&hloc=de
https://geizhals.de/intenso-high-performance-ssd-240gb-3813440-a1420370.html?hloc=at&hloc=de

And while a hybrid is not always as fast as an SSD, it can be for Windows (probably won't be using it for much more anyway) so long as it is not recently updated.
 

Mathias_8

Commendable
Apr 8, 2016
58
0
1,640
Well, from the reactions people seem to me a little superstitious about SSDs (makes up 70% of a functional build, has to be even faster than the previous generation) and "hybrids" equally.
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator


No, it's not superstition. You just have to realize what an SSHD is, and its limitation.

If it is the 'only drive', in an office situation, where you use the same basic applications every day...maybe.

But the SSHD is a small (tiny) SSD, married with a regular 5400RPM spinning drive.
Whatever data blocks are used the most end up in that 8GB SSD space. Everything else is read off the 5400HDD.
And writes are always at HDD speed.

So, for a gamer use...the OS and maybe the game client and a few utilities end up on the SSD space. Everything else is read off the HDD anyway.
Next game level? HDD.
Different game today? HDD.

An SSD is fast across the whole space. 250GB, 500GB, whatever.

I personally would not build a PC without an SSD.
In fact, my 3 main systems in the house here are SSD only. 8 drives across 3 systems.
Large data lives in the NAS box across the LAN, where speed does not really matter. Like the movie I'm watching right now.
 

Mathias_8

Commendable
Apr 8, 2016
58
0
1,640
Ultimately went with both, by the way, if that wasn't apparent. A "high-speed" Toshiba P300 1TB HDD and an Amazon offer of the Crucial BX300 240GB. Without the offer, I would have been screwed regarding prices and quality of SSDs though.