The older CX model PSUs aren't the greatest quality, and generally either fail early on, or you get a year or two out of them (not saying they can't last longer, just generally speaking).
The CX lineup were built down to the cheap pricepoint, to fill a need in the market - but they were never intended to last for the same length of time that could be expected from Corsairs RM, TX, RMi lineups.
The CX430 has a 3 year warranty.
Quality PSU offerings in the market have 7-10 year warranties.
You have a TX gathering dust? I'd be more inclined to use that (although there are variants there too).
You're not really saving any power with a 430 vs a 600/650 - you are, it's just negligible for most folks.
Assuming your max power draw is around 300W total for the system.
A CX430 80+ bronze would be running around 70% load on the PSU - so with 80+ Bronze spec, should be 85% efficient.
That would mean the CX430 would be drawing approx 353W from the wall to power the 300W rig.
A TX650 (also 80+ Bronze IIRC) would be running around 45% load on the PSU so, with the Bronze spec, would be either 82% or 85% efficient.
At 82% efficient, it's pulling 366W from the wall
At 85% efficient, it's pulling the same 353W from the wall that the CX430 would be.
Worst-case, there's a 7W different (again, max load - so would be even less in "real world" use cases).
Let's assume 24/7 usage at max load.
7W x 24Hr x 365 days
= 61,320Wh
/1000 = 61 KWh
Average US homes pay somewhere between $0.10 and $0.20 per KWh IIRC.
So, over the course of a year, absolute worst case, the difference between the two PSUs would increase your electricity bill by $12.20..... or $1 per month*.
*Remember, that's 24/7 use @ 100% load. Real world usage, I'd expect your annual increase in power consumption (and therefore, cost) to be in the <$5 range.