Ryden 1600x vs 1700

elli_loule

Prominent
Dec 11, 2017
11
0
510
Hi ,I am from Greece and i want to build a new PC for multitasking and editing on Photoshop and other Adobe aplications .Also i need it for low - medium quality gamimg if i need it in the future .I understand that AMD RYZEN CPUs are efficient on these tasks and i am thinking about 1600x and 1700 I search for that and i don't know which of these two to choose .Firstly, Ryzen 1600x provides me what i need for my pc in a lower budget but it doesn't have stuck cooler. On the other hand , 1700 is much better and faster with stuck cooler but it is a little bit expesive than the other .My budget for the PC components is about 1000€ .What's your opinion ?
 
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor ($288.58 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: MSI - X370 GAMING PRO CARBON ATX AM4 Motherboard ($131.88 @ OutletPC)
Memory: Team - Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($179.89 @ OutletPC)
Storage: SK hynix - SL308 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($92.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($59.99 @ Amazon)
Video Card: Asus - Radeon RX 580 4GB Dual Video Card ($254.89 @ OutletPC)
Case: Phanteks - ECLIPSE P400 ATX Mid Tower Case ($66.98 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA G2 750W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($107.89 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1183.09
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-12-11 15:17 EST-0500
 
Solution

elli_loule

Prominent
Dec 11, 2017
11
0
510

Thank you so much
 

elli_loule

Prominent
Dec 11, 2017
11
0
510


Can you suggest an other option for storage and memory ,preferably Corsair, G.Skill Or HyperX. Probably the best brand in the Hardware section and another video card .I support to your opinion mate .

 

elli_loule

Prominent
Dec 11, 2017
11
0
510


So, this one could help me if i want to play something in the future ? Could it influence my other tasks apart from gaming ? I mean that could it be effective ?

 
Yeah it will be it will be good for another few years (3+) same as 1060 6GB but im unsure will help, as part nvidia using cuda cores and amd stream process, depends which programs you will be using, well if someone else could say more information but im not into that stuff
"1.)AMD has more supported consumer cards overall
2.)OpenCL support is better tested by Adobe on AMD cards as more of them list OpenCL support
3.)There are loads of videos of AMD and Adobe reps talking about the work they have done to incorporate OpenCL support into Adobe software including the Mercury Playback Engine
4.)Adobe is moving more and mroe stuff off CUDA/OpenGL to OpenCL
5.)AMD budget cards tend to much better in productivity based stuff than Nvidia ones due to the bifurcation of the Nv lines starting with Kepler
6.)The AMD cards are MASSIVELY cheaper for similar performance. A £140 R9 285 is close to or exceeding a £250+ GTX970 in such benchmarks. A £70 R7 260X is most likely to be as good as something like a GTX960 or GTX750TI or maybe even faster
7.)Nvidia is still betting on CUDA meaning OpenCL support is more an afterthought and IIRC in one Anandtech review a while back they stated something to that degree. They are starting to change that view though,but ATM are behind in consumer cards,even though Maxwell has improved. They do very well in synthetics but not so well in actual software."

https://forums.hexus.net/graphics-cards/336400-amd-nvidia-graphics-card-photo-editing.html

For gaming they are equall,just depends what you can find cheaper, for editing well im unsure, sorry im unable to provide more information.
As i search Photo depends for CPU&RAM, VIDEO GPU,

"Honestly bud; for "photo editing" your going to be more CPU & Ram biased.
Your current build is well suited for this. (Thank you for listing "complete" specs BTW) ;)
The only time would would want a "high-end" GPU for photos would be @ ultra high resolution and "insane" zoom. This is where the "GPU" would be of importance, load time under extreme zoom situations on a 4k monitor. With that being said; the Quadro isn't going to have much impact over a GT/GTX GPU. Now, if she was doing "3d Modeling" (Maya,Cad,Bryce, ect.) then a Quadro would be better suited; but for still photo's she's not going to know the difference. According to the PS forums; pretty much any Cuda enabled NV gpu with a min of 1Gb of Vram would do just fine. "

Sorry if i give you any wrong info.Someone else could "repair" my answer.