MSI gtx 970 VS 1050ti Gaming X

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815
getting new gaming PC very soon for few games like WoW, CS, batlefield, GTA 5 etc ... got 2 brand new choices
1- i5 7400 / bad motherboard h110 / Msi gtx 970 gaming 4gb / 8gb RAM
2- ryzen 1600 / msi b350 gaming Plus / msi gtx 1050ti gaming X / 8gb RAM

to be honnest, i love ryzen (6 cores 12 threads, 70% CPU utilisation maximum in all modern games which is super future proof, same am4 socket untill 2020) but that MSI 970 made me think again and again.

glad to receive some help.
 
Solution


do you understand why cpu's are benchmarked at low resolutions?

you cant hide behind gpu bound scenarios =)



the i5 8400 is stronger than a 4ghz ryzen, out the gate

you are NOT guaranteed 4ghz on ryzen



all of the people that bought a cheap b350 mobo with crappy VRM are going to be shut out in the cold with ryzen 2


am3/am3+ all over again



its madness buying ryzen for gaming right now, barring you live in a place where the price difference is wacked out vs a i5 8400




I will go with Ryzen build, may get you better FPS than the 1st build in games as long as you pick the right setting. You can easily upgrade GPU in the future if you feel 1050 ti can not satisfy you any more. 1050 ti can play any AAA games with decent FPS. Battlefield will love 6 cores. WOW and CS are single core but 1600 still can get ~80 for WOW and 300-400 for CS.
 

ryzenlover2017

Prominent
Nov 30, 2017
132
0
710
Are those your only options because you could likely get a more balanced build with a slightly worse CPU maybe a 1400 or 1500 and a 1060... Unless you are doing more CPU intensive tasks than running games.
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815




i can downgrade to ryzen 1500x but that difference doesnt give enough room to upgrade the GPU, so guess am stuck with 1050ti for 2 years, and its cool for the few games i want to play
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815


ryzen iss great, but the 1080 price is equal to the whole RIG in my country
 

jakubek160

Respectable
May 22, 2017
634
0
2,360
Get ryzen 5 1600 and gtx 1050 ti , but personally I would find the money for gtx 1060 6gb to be ohnest man. If you just simply can't do it , take gtx 1050 ti and then replace it in a year or something.
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815
i think i have the final decision, Ryzen 1600 idea is locked ( 6 cores will last at least for 4 years same as 4 cores lasted for 5 years from 2012) so i have to go for 1050ti for now which is enough for my needs so why spending more for something i would not use.
emotionally i want the 1080 or 1060 at least like everyone but wisdom in reality is a good friend.
 

maxalge

Champion
Ambassador


how much is a 1600 vs a i5 8400 where you live?


a 1600 is no more "future proof" than the 8350 was when it released
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815


we still dont have the 8th i5 yet in north Affrica continent, we got all ryzen + i7 8700k
the reason i pick ryzen 1600 over the 1500x is the core count, 6/8 cores will last for the next 4-5 years.
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815


is this your recording? the video didnt show config
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815
i've seen a lot of records 1050ti is really good but ... some got 6 pin connector and some dont, i know its better to get 6pin 1050ti if willing to OC but my question is can both types hit the same OC evel 'safe'
 


Additional 6 pin usually will allow the card to OC faster, can you list a few you are considering?
 

maxalge

Champion
Ambassador


you can clearly see what i said was true

when stuff starts hitting the fan it drops to ~30 - ~40 fps


with a i5 8400 you would never see below 60
 

maxalge

Champion
Ambassador


in 4k maybe you can hide the weakness of the cpu by sheer force of gpu bound scenario, this is far from the truth in cpu bound situations where the vast majority of online games squarely reside

the i5 8400, i5 8600k, or i7 8700k are well worth waiting for/saving for if you want the setup to last 4 - 5 years of great performance
 

gm-madi

Respectable
Nov 26, 2017
277
2
1,815
to answer Maxalage and Ryzenlover

Ryzen 1600 and i5 8400 are almost same performance ( i've been diging for 3 months, even before i5 is out )
and 'almost' means the 8400 is slightly better 3-5% in 'some cases' and Ryzen vise versa, both are great but lets analyze a bit
the 8400 is much better when it comes to low pixels like 720p ( who needs that anymore in gaming ) but for 1080p the intel doesnt really 'kick ass' in term of price.
- the ryzen got double cores the i5 has. and again am4 will be supported untill 2020.
and the final thoughts, media prooved that Intel payed big stores to not provide public with new AMD components, must be a reason for that and seems to me that AMD is giving great components with adequate price, which made me kinda hate intel, each generation need a new motherboard and socket.
 

maxalge

Champion
Ambassador


do you understand why cpu's are benchmarked at low resolutions?

you cant hide behind gpu bound scenarios =)



the i5 8400 is stronger than a 4ghz ryzen, out the gate

you are NOT guaranteed 4ghz on ryzen



all of the people that bought a cheap b350 mobo with crappy VRM are going to be shut out in the cold with ryzen 2


am3/am3+ all over again



its madness buying ryzen for gaming right now, barring you live in a place where the price difference is wacked out vs a i5 8400




 
Solution

ryzenlover2017

Prominent
Nov 30, 2017
132
0
710
Ryzen really is a great architecture for gaming, and will dominate in other tasks that take use of more cores. Sure at 720p it might be a bottleneck... But if you're gaming at that resolution, then you probably don't need more then a 950. Comparing it to am3 is uncalled for considering at that point it was still running on pile-driver which I wholeheartedly agree wasn't great after a year or two.