Help me decide about an upgrade!

tcortinag

Prominent
May 1, 2017
4
0
510
Hello, I build a PC last year and I want to start upgrading so I get a bit more performance, not that I complain, just I think some things can be improved.

My current build is:

CPU: Intel Core i5-7400
MoBo: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H
RAM: 2x Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR4 2400MHz
GPU: Asus Strix RX480 8GB OC
SSD: Kingston V300 120GB
HDD: WD Scorpio Black 750GB
PSU: Seasonic G 550W Gold

I use it daily for web browsing, productivity, etc. but also for gaming (1080p) and Lightroom/Photoshop.

Games I tend to play: Doom, Crysis (all 3), F1 2016, Far Cry Primal, Shadow of Mordor, SCII.

I was thinking of replacing my current SSD for one in the 240/250GB range and adding a second one with 500GB capacity for games and leave the WD Scorpio for files.

Also, changing my MoBo for an H270 or Z270 maybe? But then I realize that going Z270 so I can change CPU for a K later will be almost the same as going Z370 with an 8th gen proc (or X370 with Ryzen 5-1600 or 7-1700). so I don't think investing in the MoBo is a good idea, maybe replacing the whole CPU/MoBo worths.

Regarding GPU, this one gives a decent gaming (at least for now) 60+FPS in games with High/Ultra settings in 1080p, not planning upgrading to 1440p or beyond for now.

What do you think? Do you agree with my upgrades? What would you change first and why?


 
Solution
if you are going to stick to 1080p gaming and lightroom/PS your specs are fine. You only need a 6/8 core cpu for 1440/4k and streaming games. If you plan to do video editing in Adobe Premier in the future a GTX1060 would be logical upgrade (CUDA cores); or used GTX980.

Personally, i would upgrade both your drives, a 512GB SSD for system and editing, and a 3TB Seagate 7200rpm drive for storing games and finished photos. Your WD drive - whilst faster than a standard HDD - can't match any SSD. So being able to edit in lightroom from files on the SSD would be better. Storing your games on a HDD will only increase loading time and will not affect FPS.

jgustin7b

Commendable
Nov 17, 2017
1,216
0
1,660
You could get a 250gb SSD for frequent programs, but about the 500gb one, hold off on that or just get a 1 or 2 Tb hdd for much more storage, at the cost of loading times...that’s it. Plus, it may be even cheaper. Otherwise, if you want to keep main components the same, I think that’s all I have to say.
 

Bungle11

Reputable
Aug 24, 2015
357
0
4,860
if you are going to stick to 1080p gaming and lightroom/PS your specs are fine. You only need a 6/8 core cpu for 1440/4k and streaming games. If you plan to do video editing in Adobe Premier in the future a GTX1060 would be logical upgrade (CUDA cores); or used GTX980.

Personally, i would upgrade both your drives, a 512GB SSD for system and editing, and a 3TB Seagate 7200rpm drive for storing games and finished photos. Your WD drive - whilst faster than a standard HDD - can't match any SSD. So being able to edit in lightroom from files on the SSD would be better. Storing your games on a HDD will only increase loading time and will not affect FPS.
 
Solution