Is Freesync a killer feature?

piquet00

Honorable
Mar 18, 2012
11
0
10,510
I bought a Samsung 34in curved Freesync monitor this time last year with the intention of building a new PC with a Vega card in. I'm using a GTX750 card at the moment so have not had any opportunity to run games at full resolution (3440x1440) of the monitor.

12 months later I find that Vega prices are completely through the roof here in the UK, partly because of the HBM2 memory and partly due to mining. Nvidia pricing and availability are better right now so I am wondering how much of a killer feature Freesync is and whether I might be better off just getting an Nvidia card.

So, here are some example prices:

Vega56 are 750 - 850 GBP but almost all cards pre-order only
Vega64 are just under 1000 GBP but are available to buy

1070TI are 600 GBP and becoming available
1080 are 650 GBP and most models available
1080TI are 850 - 900 GBP and some models available

So really Vega56, if you could buy one, are around the same price as a 1080TI which is arguably the best card on the market without spending an absolute fortune.

Vega64 seems just way overpriced especially as you consider a 1080TI is 100 GBP cheaper.

My question is, I have the Freesync monitor which I can't afford to change for the foreseeable future, but would a 1080 or 1080TI look as good without freesync as either of the Vega cards?

The monitor, by the way, is a Samsung C34F791WQU and is capable of 3440x1440 at 100Hz. I haven't got the hardware to drive it over 60Hz right now so I've not seen what 100Hz looks like. This also begs the question, does freesync make a difference at 100Hz?

I'd be grateful of some opinions on this!


 

Caleb Hale

Distinguished
May 17, 2013
54
0
18,660
I can't answer specifically about Freesync. I can tell you that I just upgraded to a 4k g-sync monitor.
When I first tried a game at 4k@60hz there was so much screen tearing that it was almost unplayable. After enabling g-sync, everything was as smooth as butter...and so beautiful.
Based on my limited experience, I'd absolutely recommend to stick with AMD even though it will take longer and/or cost more so you can take advantage of freesync.
 

piquet00

Honorable
Mar 18, 2012
11
0
10,510


Thanks Caleb - sounds like GSync works well - wonder of Freesync is as effective though.
 

piquet00

Honorable
Mar 18, 2012
11
0
10,510


So, if an Nvidia card could drive my monitor at 100Hz you are saying Freesync is probably not that effective.
 

bfcallan

Honorable
Jan 14, 2014
173
3
10,715
I see forums of people discussing how to keep in the freesync and gsync ranges of fps in order to use it. They were limiting their fps to stay inside and actually use it. But, thats all I know, I am sort of in the same boat as you, and was just trying to share what I have gathered.
 

piquet00

Honorable
Mar 18, 2012
11
0
10,510


Well I decided in the end to not go for a Vega given that they seem almost impossible to get hold of anyway and their price is hugely inflated. I went to order a GTX1080 yesterday but somehow managed to end up with a Gigabyte AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G in my basket. Arrives tomorrow so I guess I will soon see how well it works with my monitor!