Here is my rig:
intel 8700k , 16gb kings ram , 250gb ssd samsumg, noctua u12s, corsair rm850x, gtx 1080
I will use it for programming. And I may buy 2 gtx 1080 for Machine Learning.
I wont overclock. My main concern is durability (althought the bios Flashback and extra 4-pin conector in msi pleases me either ).
I see some people complaining on mSI quality control. But the MSI motherboard seems more robust to me.
And I was readingt the RMA return rate in Hardware.fr
"Les taux de retour des composants (S2 2016)" -- there are other dates too.
ASUS shows RMA rate in the first year something like 2 percent ( z270/z170/z97)
MSI varies from 2 to 4 percent.
Comparing the numbers, sometimes its twice as much.
I think that in 5 years the difference could be bigger....
What is your opinion? Is it MSI really more likely to fail in in the long-term ?
Do you have another extra-opinion that you could give me about the motherboard?
thx in advance....
intel 8700k , 16gb kings ram , 250gb ssd samsumg, noctua u12s, corsair rm850x, gtx 1080
I will use it for programming. And I may buy 2 gtx 1080 for Machine Learning.
I wont overclock. My main concern is durability (althought the bios Flashback and extra 4-pin conector in msi pleases me either ).
I see some people complaining on mSI quality control. But the MSI motherboard seems more robust to me.
And I was readingt the RMA return rate in Hardware.fr
"Les taux de retour des composants (S2 2016)" -- there are other dates too.
ASUS shows RMA rate in the first year something like 2 percent ( z270/z170/z97)
MSI varies from 2 to 4 percent.
Comparing the numbers, sometimes its twice as much.
I think that in 5 years the difference could be bigger....
What is your opinion? Is it MSI really more likely to fail in in the long-term ?
Do you have another extra-opinion that you could give me about the motherboard?
thx in advance....