Looking for GPU advice. What wouldn't be bottlenecked by my CPU or limited by my PSU? Relatively liberal budget.

Feb 26, 2018
9
0
10
Hello so I ordered this system on the 2nd this month and it arrived within a day.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 205$
Motherboard: MSI B350M Mortar - 107$
RAM: G.SKILL TridentZ 3200MHz 16CL (2x8GB) (237$)
Case: Aigo m/ATX - 34$ (not sure if mATX or ATX, either way it seems capable of fitting a 310mm or so card within a couple of cm distance from the front fans)
PSU: Coolermaster Masterwatt Lite 80Plus 500W 47$
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SATA3 - 596RMB 94$
Storage: Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200RPM (42$)

However as expected the motherboard needed a BIOS update and I'm still waiting for it to be shipped back to me from the factory.

I just got the system and haven't even had the chance to run it yet, but I have already started thinking about the ideal GPU for it. My monitor is 1080p 144Hz FreeSync. Given the local GPU prices (later in the post) what would make the most sense? I really like smoothness and any stuttering is a huge no-no so FreeSync sounds really appealing if it really is as good as people hail it to be.

I aim at Max Settings 1080p in relatively modern non-FPS (mostly RPG and MMORPG) titles whilst maintaining around 80-90FPS average with almost no dips below 60 if possible.

I'm also concerned about the PSU with some of the higher-end cards on the list. I've read conflicting opinions on how far 500W can take me. And lastly, yes I picked almost entirely MSI cards for Nvidia, I love their design too much and the price isn't too different from competitors. I might be buying as soon as 3 weeks from now, so I don't expect prices to change too drastically (unfortunately).

AMD
Sapphire Nitro+ RX580 483$
Dataland Devil RX Vega56 806$
Sapphire Nitro+ RX Vega 56 869$

Nvidia
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming 664$
MSI GTX 1070Ti Titanium 759$
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X 822$

GPU's I'm not considering but as price reference:
MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X Trio 1217$
MSI GTX 1060 6GB 490$
MSI GTX 1060 3GB 411$
Inno3D GTX 1050Ti 259$
 
Solution
I just got the system and haven't even had the chance to run it yet, but I have already started thinking about the ideal GPU for it. My monitor is 1080p 144Hz FreeSync. Given the local GPU prices (later in the post) what would make the most sense? I really like smoothness and any stuttering is a huge no-no so FreeSync sounds really appealing if it really is as good as people hail it to be.

If you wanna take advantage of Freesync, you have to use AMD cards only. Freesync does not work with NVidia cards. That said, your ideal GPU would be Vega 56 (with Freesync) and gtx1070 (without Freesync).

The PSU wattage is fine, but it is a mediocre unit as far as i know. It should hold up with the card, albeit with some amount of risk.
I just got the system and haven't even had the chance to run it yet, but I have already started thinking about the ideal GPU for it. My monitor is 1080p 144Hz FreeSync. Given the local GPU prices (later in the post) what would make the most sense? I really like smoothness and any stuttering is a huge no-no so FreeSync sounds really appealing if it really is as good as people hail it to be.

If you wanna take advantage of Freesync, you have to use AMD cards only. Freesync does not work with NVidia cards. That said, your ideal GPU would be Vega 56 (with Freesync) and gtx1070 (without Freesync).

The PSU wattage is fine, but it is a mediocre unit as far as i know. It should hold up with the card, albeit with some amount of risk.
 
Solution

JhonConners

Honorable
Jul 17, 2015
260
0
10,790
Depends on what you want;
You can make use of your freesync monitor and get an AMD gpu, but will have to deal with the bullshit that is AMD's poor drivers and overall stability
or
You can go for an Nvidia card, not making use of your freesync monitor, but get more stability + shadowplay

If you were buying a GPU like you are right now, you probably shouldn't have gotten a Ryzen 5 2400g, you probably should have opted for a ryzen 5 1600. In most games it'll only be a few frames difference, but I've seen a few games, such as Forza where the 5 1600 pulled 20ish frames ahead of the 2400g

Anyways, it depends, if you really are willing to spend in the upwards of $900 for a 1080, go for it. The 2400g won't bottleneck the 1080 too badly.

Here's some videos I found by the same guy, with some benchmarks w/ the 2400g with a 1070/1080 and he even puts it up against an i5 8400 for comparison.
"i5 8400 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Overclock OC - RX 580 8GB - Benchmarks Comparison" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk0y5LHyHw8
"i5 8400 (4.0ghz) vs Ryzen 5 2400G Overclock OC (4.0ghz) - GTX 1080 TI 11GB - Benchmarks Comparison" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNsnna6m4w8
"i5 8400 (4.0ghz) vs Ryzen 5 2400G Overclock OC (4.0ghz) - GTX 1070 8GB - Benchmarks Comparison" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Ojt487c6M
 

King_V

Illustrious
Ambassador


This is NOT a concern. I haven't had a problem with AMD drivers from 2012 onward, Catalyst, Crimson, and Adrenalin, through a few generations of AMD GPU chips.

Nvidia's top tier cards perform better than AMD's, of that there's no doubt. But the stability claim is just not so.

If I were to go with mere anecdotal evidence, between my friends and myself, we've seen more issues with Nvidia drivers. Overall, though, any stability issue differences between the two are insignificant.