Ideal Wireless Storage Solution Query

Mar 20, 2018
4
0
10
I have been looking for a solution to a storage issue I have been having at work for a while now, but since I am not thoroughly fluent in computer dialect I have not been able to find the answer to my problem. There are simpler ways to do this, but I have an ideal scenario in my head, and I want to see if it sounds possible.
In short, I use two microscopes at work, on either sides of a large room that take numerous pictures/ videos every day. The amount of high quality (and so high file size) images and videos and data means each microscope will need over 2Tb to hold all the files I will likely take. The device I need is summarized by the following qualities

- Either an External Hard Drive (will refer to as HDD) of 4TB+ with the " wireless signal" feature built-in, or some device/adapter that can be attached to an 4TB+ HDD to give it the "wireless signal" ability. Can be powered by being plugged into standard wall socket or by USB. It doesn't have to be portable (aka have a power storage ability), since it isn't planned to be used outside of a power source.
- A device that can connect, share and transfer decently large files to AND from the HDD in real time with (relatively) quick speed to a PC/laptop (not just phone, tablet). For example I would like to save a 5 minute cell division video to the HDD on the wireless signal live (save video to HDD as the video is being taken), then be able to play it back with decent quality from the HDD by the wireless connection later on that same PC. So it need to allow direct saves as if a built-in hard drive, not just "save file to a hard drive on PC, then back-up file later by wifi on the HDD"
- Vitally the device produces it's own completely independent connection signal (wifi/bluetooth/etc) and does not need to connect or attach to any existing internet network (work internet has extra securities and issues with privacy that mean it would be an extreme hassle to try setting this up). The device should also not require some "pass-through" with your existing internet connection to allow you to use it AND stay connected to the internet. So I should be able to use it without ever having to connect it in any way to the internet, and still be able to use the internet on my PCs.
- The device would be fine if it needed an additional USB dongle to the PC to allow connection (like a bluetooth adapter).
- The device should, through some method, be able to prevent other PCs, laptops, etc from gaining access, either by only connected to devices with special adapters (the pre-mentioned dongle), or by having additional software that requires a password or login to allow connection to the device and any attached HDD. Ideally this software should save the login details on the PC so you don't need to login every time you restart the PC.

Again, I know of devices that kind-of fulfill the request, but they all seem to have crucial issues (only work with <1TB, indirect saves or just back-ups, need existing internet, only work with phones/tablets, reroute your internet through them which winds up give access to everyone on that network aka NAS drives). If there is any device that can do all the mentioned things above I would be extremely grateful to get your information or help on this. Please also note I am not really looking for alternate methods (like powered long-wire USB connectors or just setting up two separate Hard drives for each PC), as mentioned earlier this is simply to check the possibility of my ideal solution.

Again thank you to anyone who can help or advise.


 
Solution
Any number of current NAS boxes could do this, with the addition of a PCIe WiFi adapter.

Like this QNAP:
https://www.qnap.com/solution/wirelessap-station/en/

"Directly connect to the NAS with a wireless network"
Mar 20, 2018
4
0
10


Just to check, the installation of the PCIe adapter to the NAS would remove any need for another sources of internet or wifi to be required for it to emit a signal, along with not interrupting the existing internet on the PC?
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator


I believe so.
I'd have to do more indepth research, but these current NAS boxes are actually PC's in their own right.
Not 'just a hard drive'.

Full linux based OS and all that.
I have a QNAP TS-453A, and could probably do this with a USB WiFI adapter.

They do want an internet connection for their own uses, like updates. But not absolutely required, and absolutely nothing else has to go through them.
It's its own little PC.
 
Mar 20, 2018
4
0
10


Hopefully my final three questions for you:
1. Does running with the Linux OS impact it's use on Windows machines?
2. Does the NAS system you use (or even better do NAS systems in general) have USB slots for a USB wifi adapter (far less finicky that PCIe card), or would PCIe be required for some reason?
3. Don't know how security on NAS works, does you PC see them like a "Device or Driver", and can you set up the NAS to be password/login protected?
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator


1. No.
I can access the entirety of the contents through the LAN, from any of my Windows systems. Mine is hardwired through the router, but I see no reason WiFi shouldn't be the same. The one I linked above can be "direct access". No router in the middle needed.

2. Yes. USB 3.0.

3. In my Windows boxes, I have the NAS 'drive' mapped as a drive letter. With its own username and password.
My systems see it simply as the N drive. And you can cause it to require the username/password every time.
Or, I can access it through the browser. 192.168.1.xxx + username/password.

Access it either through its network name/username/password
or
the IP address/username/password.

If you don't know the login details...no access.

Mine is 4 x 4TB Ironwolf drives, in RAID 5. Resulting in 10.6TB usable space.
It is the default location for anything I download through the browser. The location for nightly backups of all the house systems. Movie and music repository. Location for VM instances. Etc, etc.



I just checked on mine, and it will do WiFi via USB no problem:
GXuLifJ.png

("not ready yet" = I don't have one)
 
Mar 20, 2018
4
0
10


Sounds like the most ideal route I have seen, thank you very much for all that support.

P.S How does 4x4TB drives end with 10.6TB usable space? Seems like you would be closer to 12TB with RAID 5?
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator


Just different reporting numbers, Base 2 vs Base 10.

A "4TB" is actually '3.64 TB'
x 4 + RAID 5 = 10.9TB
+space taken up by the OS, etc.