Help Wanted With Deciding On A CPU For A Gaming & Streaming Build.

Mar 20, 2018
11
0
10
HI everyone,

I need some help with trying to figure out what CPU I should get for a Gaming & Streaming build.

The CPU that I have in mind to go with is the either the 1950X or the 1920X Threadripper, I originally thought about going with the Threadripper b/c I know for a fact that it can get the job done, and if I can afford it, then why not? I brought this up to one of my friends who knows a bit about computers and he said that using a Threadripper might be a bit over kill for just streaming and gaming which I'm aware of.

He suggested that I also look at other options which are the i7-8700k, i7-7800x, either one of the i9s (with are probably still too much money), the Ryzen 7 1800x, or he said I could wait until the new Ryzen chips release. I know that Intel CPUs will possibly allow for more frames than the Ryzen CPUs, but I don't really care for high frame rates, the monitor I have now is 60hz but if I ever get a new monitor that can do higher frame rates, I would maybe only go up to 120 FPS.

**Before thinking of just streaming and gaming off the same build, I was originally planning on doing a dual PC setup. The reason I became conflicted between the two routes was because I thought it would just be a headache trying to mix and manage the audio from two PCs. The only thing I'm skeptical about with streaming and gaming of the same build is if I'll run into any instances where either the game will interfere with the encoding of the stream, or the steam encoding would interfere with the performance of the game.**
 
Solution
You don't need an i7 k , you don't need a ryzen x.

The i7 8700 non-k will game & stream with minimal fps drops, as will the ryzen 1600.
The ryzen 1700 will game & stream with no fps drops whatsoever.

However both the 8700 & arguably the ryzen 1600 will both push more fps in the first place.

You need to set a budget & balance the rest of your build before deciding on the cpu 100%.

An i7 8700 is a better cpu than the ryzen 1600
However a ryzen 1600 + a gtx 1070 is around the same price as an i7 8700 & a 1060.

In that scenario I'd take the weaker cpu & the more powerful gpu personally.
Better option is to buy second PC with HD capture card, some cheap GPU and CPU and it will stream without having impact on your main rig.
This is just an opinion.
But the cost is space.

If you are streaming with OBS then using GPU encoding would be better than CPU.
CPU resoults better quality, GPU a bit muddier.

Hes right.
 
Mar 20, 2018
11
0
10


The two PC thing was what I was originally planning on doing, but the thing is that I use an Astro headset, I looked it up and it's a bit of a headache to mix and manage audio from two PCs with them. The other thing about building a second PC, is that GPU and RAM prices are jacked up and no one really knows when they will go back to normal.

As for the second part of your comment, I'm a little bit confused by what you said. Isn't it better to encode with your CPU? Also, what did you mean by "He's right?"

 
You don't need an i7 k , you don't need a ryzen x.

The i7 8700 non-k will game & stream with minimal fps drops, as will the ryzen 1600.
The ryzen 1700 will game & stream with no fps drops whatsoever.

However both the 8700 & arguably the ryzen 1600 will both push more fps in the first place.

You need to set a budget & balance the rest of your build before deciding on the cpu 100%.

An i7 8700 is a better cpu than the ryzen 1600
However a ryzen 1600 + a gtx 1070 is around the same price as an i7 8700 & a 1060.

In that scenario I'd take the weaker cpu & the more powerful gpu personally.
 
Solution
The 1800X is pretty darn inexpensive these days, relative to 1920/1950 and most X299/i9 affairs especially....

Depends on the importance of streaming/encoding vs. gaming prowess...

Can't imagine the 8700K getting 'run over' in a gaming while streaming comparison, but, if planning on encoding *while* gaming/streaming, the 1800X (or 1700 OC'd to same clock speeds) might prove quite economical at almost everything...

If rendering/encoding was my business, and time is money, and only a passing interest in gaming, the 1920X/1950x offer tons of cores at moderate cost relative to 7900X and above...(1900X is just plain stupid) :)

(Concur with above, if priority is gaming, much better to have R5-1600X and GTX1070 than 8700K and GTX1060, etc...)