CPU's for gaming vs. CPU's for all other performance

Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30
I'm building a desktop, but the decision I'm struggling most on is the CPU. Everything revolves around the best gaming CPU's... AMD or Intel, Integrated Graphics or Stand-Alone GPU, more cores or faster clock speeds, multi-threading or..... you get the picture.

I'm not a gamer. The most I do is play Minecraft with my son, and I'm sure Minecraft is not very demanding compared to modern games. I do, however, want a very fast, future proof system. Deciding on everything else is quite simple in comparison. Minimum 16GB Crucial RAM, minimum of 500GB SSD, any of the "must haves" for fast modern tech.

I haven't purchased the motherboard yet, so there aren't any limitations on which CPU I go with. I would like to spend around $250 or less on the CPU... And obviously I would like the best "bang for my buck."

How did you decide on the best CPU for you? Which did you choose? Are you happy with it, and if you could go back and choose something different, which?

Thanks for your advice!
 
Solution
games don't use a ton of threads yet so a fast 4 core cpu is better than a slower 16 core one. the single core performance is more important. however, that is just for running the game itself. if you also want to record and stream the gameplay, then some extra cores to handle those tasks would be useful. same as keeping chat programs active on a separate screen and so on that many gamers like to do.

depending on what and how much you plan to run for everything else, the same 4-6 cores is also ample. some production software and other high end productivity stuff can handle lots and lots of threads but that is outside the normal users range of use. but if like me you tend to have 10 things running at once, then extra threads is a must...

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
games don't use a ton of threads yet so a fast 4 core cpu is better than a slower 16 core one. the single core performance is more important. however, that is just for running the game itself. if you also want to record and stream the gameplay, then some extra cores to handle those tasks would be useful. same as keeping chat programs active on a separate screen and so on that many gamers like to do.

depending on what and how much you plan to run for everything else, the same 4-6 cores is also ample. some production software and other high end productivity stuff can handle lots and lots of threads but that is outside the normal users range of use. but if like me you tend to have 10 things running at once, then extra threads is a must as is lots of ram.

right now, the best bang for the buck is the AMD Ryzen cpu's. the R5 2600 is about $200 has 12 threads and can be overclocked on a cheap motherboard. they are almost as fast as the intel in single core performance and a much cheaper platform to buy into.

if all you are going to play is minecraft then the Ryzen 5 2400G is even cheaper and has built in graphics that will easily handle minecraft and other normal activities. use the money saved for the fastest ram you can get though as it likes real fast ram for best performance from the built in gpu.
 
Solution
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30





Would you agree that AMD is the way to go in my situation? If you had to choose a second or third, what would your choices be? I'm trying to gauge a benchmark.

Awesome help, by the way. Thank you.
 

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
at the ~$200 range of cpu, AMD is the way to go. up or down and things change as you change budget.

for instance the i5 -8500 is a good chip at $190. gets that slightly faster single core performance and since it is locked can be mixed with cheaper mobo's from the intel side. but it is 6 threads only vs the 12 you get for similar priced amd Ryzen 5. so again goes back to just how much stuff you want to run at once if those extra 6 threads is worth it to you for slightly slower ipc.

for me AMD is the way to go at that budget range since i would actually use all those threads as i tend to run a bunch of stuff at once.

to save a ton the Ryzen 2400G saves the cost of the discrete gpu with it's decent built in video. it is roughly a nvidia 1030 in performance which is great bang for the buck. if minecraft is the only game you wanna play on it. but it will quickly show it's weakness with newer AAA games if you ever decide to go there.
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


Excellent. Thank you.
 
Ryzen 5 2400g only serves to play moderately well in 720p resolution. If you have a 1080P screen you need a discrete GPU card. Since your requirements are not very high you can get a GTX 1050 ti.

If you choose AMD then go for Ryzen 1600 or Ryzen 1600x. If you like overclocking choose rizen 5 1600 and overclock it. If you dont like overclock choose Ryzen 1600x (it overclock for you). It is not worth paying the price difference for a Ryzen 2600 or 2600x. You will not notice difference.

If you choose I5-8400 then go for a I5-8400 and a B360 motherboard (the cheapest one that meet yours requirements). It is not worth paying the price difference for a I5-8500 or I5-8600K.

Very important: If you choose AMD, you should buy a special DDR4 3200 RAM for Ryzen, for example, Flarex. If you choose Intel you have enough with any DDR4 2666 (of course it may be higher but you will not notice the difference). The Ryzen lose a lot if they use 2133 or 2400 speed memories.

Both Ryzen 5 1600x and I5 8400 are excellent options that will serve you for many years. Actually they are certainly more than you need and could be handled perfectly with the Ryzen 5 1500x or I3 8100. I write this with a Q6600 processor (2007), so I speak to you with full knowledge

Keep in mind that for the system to be balanced as a reference the CPU should not cost more than the GPU.

 
The best 'bang for your buck' is plainly the ryzen 2400g simply because if minecraft is really the only game you'll play you don't need to spend $100+ on a gpu.

It'll run 50-60 fps at high settings on the integrated graphics.

You need to set a cumulative budget for cpu,ram,motherboard,gpu before you'll get really useful advise though.

Simply because at this point in time a lowish end gpu costs almost as much as a mid range cpu.
 

If you looked at benchmarks you must have noticed by now that there is nothing the 2200g can do better then a intel quad like the i3-8100 ( $117.00 ) but there is stuff where the 2200g is much slower,it makes zero sense to go with a CPU that is slower in anything unless you can't afford to get a GPU and even then it's a hard sell since you can always save money to get a gpu later on.
Future proof is all about headroom and the faster CPU has more of it.
The i5-8400 and up are already overkill even for future proofing,those are specialized CPUs for specialized workloads and for the crazies.
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


I went with AMD R5 1600 and I’m going to overclock it, but this section of your comment has me concerned. Are you saying that’s the only RAM I should consider going with? Because it’s very expensive. I planned on going with 32gb but even 16GB of that RAM is more than I planned on spending.

I went with ASUS Prime B350-Plus Mobo. Do you know of a site that typically has RAM in particular on sale? I’m going to have to see some options. Now my stomach is turning.
 
^ you won't need to overclock the ryzen1600 for your intended uses - it's fast enough at stock.

Ram - I would buy minimum 2666mhz if you can find it at the right price, however 2400kHz ram is fine imo ,there is a slight performance drop off but people honestly way over exaggerate it.

The ryzen does not have integrated graphics you know?? You will need a discrete gpu if this is the path you're taking
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


I think my problem is that when I see the better CPU's out there, I think to myself "I need that in order for it to be as fast as I want" but I keep trying to remind myself that I'm paying almost as much for this "low" end CPU as most people do for their entire desktop from Walmart or whatever, so there must be a performance increase in even the "lowest" end CPU's (and the same goes for the RAM, Motherboard, etc.) So I keep trying to remind myself that I will hopefully be very pleased with my first build.... I'm not sure if I mentioned that earlier, which is why I second guess everything.

I'm aware I have to buy a GPU, which is one of the things I'm second guessing myself on, but the GPU and RAM should be the only things I have left and I've spent days and hours researching each component to have some confidence in my decisions, but what it comes down to is I won't know until its in my hands and I can see it perform. Reading spec after spec after review after forum is exhausting and while very informative... I need to actually see what this CPU can do, or this RAM, etc.

Speaking of GPU's, any recommendations? Keep it mind I know nothing. If I spend $200 on RAM and $200 on GPU, I will be at around $1,300 which is roughly double what I was hoping to spend and three times more than I had ever planned... so best bang for the buck is becoming much more important at this point. Keep in mind I'll be playing Minecraft only. I just want a really fast computer for everything else I do. I'll be juggling a bunch of spreadsheets, browser tabs, email, for quick real estate decision making etc.

Your help is very appreciated.
Thank you.
 
^
1. You absolutely 100% do not need 32gb ram.
2. 2400 is fast enough for general use with a ryzen cpu,by all accounts go for faster ram IF the price difference isn't too drastic.
3.You are overspending to the point of insensibility.
The 2400g with integrated graphics looks to be ideal for you honestly & will drop a huge amount from your build cost.

If you find in the future it isn't upgrades are easy & 'relatively' cheap.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 2400G 3.6GHz Quad-Core Processor ($162.79 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: ASRock - X370 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard ($89.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: Team - T-Force Delta RGB 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($159.99 @ Newegg Business)
Storage: Western Digital - Blue 250GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive ($69.99 @ Amazon)
Storage: Western Digital - Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($43.85 @ OutletPC)
Case: Zalman - R1 ATX Mid Tower Case ($49.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Power Supply: BitFenix - Whisper M 450W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($59.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Total: $636.59
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-05-06 10:05 EDT-0400
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


I'm having trouble deciding if this is a relief or a huge disappointment lol. I guess I can return the CPU when it gets here and buy the 2400G, then get 16gb ram and call it good. I wanted the 1600 more for the 6 cores 12 threads, the graphics aren't as important to me since I'm not a gamer.. is there some low end GPU that will do just fine with minecraft but isn't too expensive I can use for now since prices are so high? I feel like I will regret getting the quadcore later.

When using PCPartPicker... say I put in my CPU first before anything else, will it default to only other components that work with that CPU? and trickle down, so say I choose the mobo next and it will only give ram options that work for both the CPU and Mobo I chose, and not just one or the other?

Thank you!
 

Math Geek

Titan
Ambassador
that's how partpicker works. spot on. pick the cpu and then it'll only show motherboards that work with it and ram and so on.

the only time oyu really need the super fast ram is with the 2400g. notice matt went with 3000 speed ram for that. integrated graphics benefit a lot from the fast ram since the gpu is built onto the same die as the cpu. but a separate gpu has it's own ram which is much faster than DDR4 and does not depend on the speed of the system ram. therefore you can use much slower ram and not see any performance hit. many many benchmarks have been done and rarely does the fast ram gain more than a few fps in games. it does make a difference in high end production programs but unless your rendering video and such for a living you'll also not see the effects of the extra ram speed.

you sound like you've gotten yourself into a paralyzing mode due to over information. looking at partpicker i see these sets that are a good buy right now.
https://pcpartpicker.com/products/compare/qBmxFT,3CdFf7,PBPKHx/

$150 for the 2400 speed or another $10-15 for 3000 speed. more than that and you're overspending by a lot for something that won't benefit you. this is assuming you go with the 1600 cpu. stick with 3000 speed or more if you go for the 2400g.

the "need for speed" is easy to overdue. i like to think of it in terms of cars. if you're looking for a sports car to buy. there are options from $50k up to $5 mil!! if you get the $150k porsche would you enjoy it? would it be fast enough? keep in mind there is still a $2.5 mil Bugati that is insanely fast. would you feel like your losing out if you "only" bought the porshce? of course not. you'd get all you could handle and use with that car despite there still being faster cars on the market. it's easy to dismiss the million buck cars since they are well out of a normal budget.

pc parts are priced closer together. so midrange to high end is not as big of a jump. so a $750 budget can easily go to $1000 or higher without you realizing it is a 25% jump in cost. settle for what your budget can buy you and know you're not gonna be losing out by not having the $2000 system. when your rich then go back and nit pick those specs and just enjoy the porsche you did buy until then :D

this goes for every part. the $100 motherboard is "good enough" despite there being a super ultra mega $350 version. you won't even know what your missing as you'll never use the extra features they offer.
 

Karadjgne

Titan
Ambassador
Something like this is going the 'other' route and using a non-igpu cpu.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz 6-Core Processor ($174.79 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: Asus - PRIME B350M-E Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard ($64.99 @ Amazon)
Memory: Team - T-Force Delta RGB 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($159.99 @ Newegg Business)
Storage: Seagate - FireCuda 1TB 2.5" 5400RPM Hybrid Internal Hard Drive ($60.99 @ Newegg Marketplace)
Video Card: Asus - GeForce GT 1030 2GB Phoenix Fan OC Video Card ($89.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Case: Rosewill - FBM-X1 MicroATX Mini Tower Case ($26.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: Corsair - CXM (2015) 450W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply ($49.99 @ Amazon)
Total: $627.73
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-05-06 11:51 EDT-0400
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


You've been of great help. Thank you.
 
Apr 29, 2018
42
0
30


I went with the GPU you suggested. I'm hoping it will be more than enough for what I'm doing. Thank you.