First PC build, low budget second opinon

PrettyDecentGuy

Prominent
Apr 5, 2017
10
0
510
CPU: Intel - Core i5-7500 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($179.00 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: MSI - Z270 GAMING PLUS ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($114.36 @ Newegg)
Memory: ADATA - 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory ($74.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Western Digital - Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($43.85 @ OutletPC)
Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB STRIX Video Card ($203.89 @ Newegg Marketplace)
Case: Deepcool - TESSERACT SW ATX Mid Tower Case ($34.98 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: SeaSonic - 520W 80+ Bronze Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($34.99 @ Newegg)
Total: $686.06

So far these are the parts I've scrounged up. I want to throw my hat back into the PC gaming world. I miss playing Arma 3 and games like Rust, DayZ(despite it being dead. Ironic right lol. Cause its a zombie game? Ill stop.)
I played those games on a pc prebuilt in 2010. On low settings mostly. I want to build a low budget system. I dont really care much about overclocking. As long as I can play the game. I do want some room for upgrading. Maybe add another graphics card. I also want to keep it below 700 preferably 500 ish.

Looking for a second opinon and maybe where I could get some good deals.
 
Solution
i3-8350K
I did make one but I don't think it's a good choice. you need a CPU cooler (Ryzen you don't necessarily) so long-story short that build ended up similar cost to the R5-2600 build.

I don't think the i3-8350K is enough faster per core to compensate for the extra cores/threads the R5-2600 offers (especially keeping the PC long term where CPU load is only going to go up).

Obviously the i3-8350K would be faster in many situations but even then not by enough IMO to justify the potential difference in other, demanding situations.

*for really, really TIGHT BUDGETS here's a build using an APU:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/CjPcTB

Those aren't necessarily the parts I'd choose, and of course the graphics is relatively weak but if the...
Technically that's not irony as loosely irony is about the OPPOSITE thing happening (i.e. I loaded up the game called "LIFE" and it killed my PC...).

Anyway, I'll attempt to make a build. No point in making a range of $500 to $700 since that will give far too many choices (like cheap dual-core CPU which I don't recommend).

*will use $700USD without cost of Windows to see how it goes.
 
quick build ($700USD) no Windows:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/cFz9NQ

(may be a BIOS update issue with the new CPU so you need to investigate that if going this route. X470 motherboards support the newer 2000 series by default)

Not necessarily ideal. I just wanted to see if you could fit in a 6-core Ryzen (R5-2600) CPU since that will really help the PC to last even if we have to sacrifice the graphics a bit for now.

(GTX750Ti is pretty crappy for $200... it's very roughly about HALF the performance of a GTX1050Ti with only half the video memory too)

I know Arma 3 is pretty demanding of the CPU though I can't find reliable info on the differences between CPU's.
 

kraelic

Distinguished
Feb 12, 2006
940
1
19,360
*CPU*
I'm playing around with an Intel build, but based on the games you are looking at I'd get at minimum:

a) x4 fast cores without hyperthreading (i.e. i3-8350K and overclock), or
b) x4 slower cores WITH hyperthreading (i.e. R5-2400)

UPDATED above to "R5-2400" as I had i5-2400 which is a little different.

An i3-8100 is good value CPU but ARMA 3 in particular likes both CPU performance per CORE but also appears to want at least four cores. A fast i3-8350K for the budget might be ideal. Hard to say for sure.

The i3-8350K can run up to roughly 5GHz with good cooler (or at least 4.6GHz with $50ish cooler) but the i3-8100 maxes out at 3.6GHz so the i3-8350K can run roughly 40% faster per core with overclocking.

With Ryzen make sure also:
a) memory bandwidth is sufficient (i.e. 2x4GB 3000MHz CL15 DDR4), and
b) motherboard has x4 DIMM slots (to add another 2x4GB later), and
c) motherboard supports OVERCLOCKING
 
i3-8350K
I did make one but I don't think it's a good choice. you need a CPU cooler (Ryzen you don't necessarily) so long-story short that build ended up similar cost to the R5-2600 build.

I don't think the i3-8350K is enough faster per core to compensate for the extra cores/threads the R5-2600 offers (especially keeping the PC long term where CPU load is only going to go up).

Obviously the i3-8350K would be faster in many situations but even then not by enough IMO to justify the potential difference in other, demanding situations.

*for really, really TIGHT BUDGETS here's a build using an APU:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/CjPcTB

Those aren't necessarily the parts I'd choose, and of course the graphics is relatively weak but if the budget is tight you can always start there are replace with a dedicated graphics card later.

You'd also be running 2GB of the DDR4 likely (in BIOS allocated) so only 6GB left for Windows + game code as the iGPU shares memory.

I'd rather see a bare minimum of 3GB video memory.

Summary:
If budget is really TIGHT then please specify exactly what it is. For now I think I'd look more at the R5-2600 (6C/12T) build if possible for longer-life of the PC. (again note the potential CPU BIOS update issue unless motherboard is new enough... I think AMD has cheap CPU's they send out if you have to flash).

*note X470 has a cool new feature for caching/hybrid SSD+HDD operation but prices of X470 are high right now. If possible maybe wait a bit?
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Storage/Quick-Look-AMD-Ryzen-X470-NVMe-Storage-Performance

With STOREMI you could for example just add a 250GB SSD, M.2 PCIe drive later. It's pretty neat.
 
Solution