I mostly use my C: drive for program files, not data. I keep my data on external drives or my NAS.
Most of my programs are Adobe Creative Cloud or Microsoft Office and so I have subscriptions and they get updated frequently. (so does the OS) I've noticed that over time performance has been going down and down and seems to be disk-bound with my C: drive getting longer queues and spending lots of time in 100% Highest Active Time.
Someone suggested that with all these updates, maybe my program files and OS files are getting fragmented. But my disk analysis only shows 15% fragmentation.
But then I had a thought - most of my disk is empty. So that's not fragmented at all. Could that skew the percentages? If you have a mostly empty disk but the files that are on the disk are badly fragmented would that still show up as a low percentage? In other words when they say "15%" fragmentation do they mean 15% of my FILES or 15% of my DISK?
Most of my programs are Adobe Creative Cloud or Microsoft Office and so I have subscriptions and they get updated frequently. (so does the OS) I've noticed that over time performance has been going down and down and seems to be disk-bound with my C: drive getting longer queues and spending lots of time in 100% Highest Active Time.
Someone suggested that with all these updates, maybe my program files and OS files are getting fragmented. But my disk analysis only shows 15% fragmentation.
But then I had a thought - most of my disk is empty. So that's not fragmented at all. Could that skew the percentages? If you have a mostly empty disk but the files that are on the disk are badly fragmented would that still show up as a low percentage? In other words when they say "15%" fragmentation do they mean 15% of my FILES or 15% of my DISK?