Strix GTX 1060 OC unstable

Apr 20, 2018
4
0
10
Hey there.
It's been like 2 months since I assembled this new rig and it's been running good with OC. Had +132 MHz freq clock (XSplit indicates a max frequency of ~2150 ingame) with GPU Tweak and everything was nice and steady.
Recently I started to notice GPU failures while gaming. Happening around 5~10mins of gameplay. When it comes to Need for Speed Payback, well that even takes seconds. Completely confused, reduced OC value to +102MHz, other games are fine but Payback still crashes in some in-game menus. Really need help, is my mobo faulty? Have I burnt anything? Is it a driver bug? Here we go the specs:

  • Motherboard: Asus Prime z370-A
    CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K
    VGA: Asus ROG Strix GTX1060 6GB OC (on PCIe16 slot 1)
    PSU: CoolerMaster Masterwatt 750W Bronze

Recent actions which might be good for diagnosis (Btw idk when the thing actually started happening):

    ■ Changed mobo optimisation from TPU I to TPU II (Turbo 5.0 GHz hyperthreading enabled)
    ■ Enabled OC range enhancement through GPU Tweak
    ■ Disabled OC range enhancement through GPU Tweak
    ■ Installed GeForce driver 288 + CUDA SDK 9.1
    At this point I noticed that I can increase the clock way higher than +132MHz, not as much as OCRE, but yea
    ■ Increased core OC to +152MHz (ow no, GPU fail! Nice thing is, the only game that could sustain that OC was Tom Clancy's The Division, no crash, no fail, full load)
    ■ Reduced core OC to +132MHz
    ■ Did some stress testing on both CPU and GPU
    ■ Started playing GTA V (GPU fail here)
    ■ Started playing Need for Speed Payback (GPU fail here)
    ■ Uninstalled XSplit gamecaster
    ■ Installed GeForce driver 297 (No change in failures)
    ■ Gave up, playing The Division (GPU fail here) (WTF??)
    ■ Reduced core OC to +102MHz (Almost good, NFSPB still GPU-fails in some menus)
    ■ Disabled Windows gamebar


So, would be glad to help me find the issue.
 
Solution
This is simply due to chip limitations in OC. Voltage tweaking even though only for some seconds can damage the GPU, thus not recommendable unless you accept this risk and have sufficient money in your pocket. Be happy that the card is still up and running and enjoy the extra 122Mhz. ;)
Apr 20, 2018
4
0
10

Well, in terms of actual usage, no I didn't.
I mean I did for a very short time - guess overal of 5 mins? - but I was like, why is there no difference, and then I put it back.
And all and all, under standard limits of GPU tweak, Without OCRE.


As I said, going below the old limits is all good and stable. I'm currently on +112MHz and things look fine.
But, I've heared people go beyond +200MHz with Strix or even FE.
 

7664stefan

Honorable
Jul 18, 2013
355
0
10,960
This is simply due to chip limitations in OC. Voltage tweaking even though only for some seconds can damage the GPU, thus not recommendable unless you accept this risk and have sufficient money in your pocket. Be happy that the card is still up and running and enjoy the extra 122Mhz. ;)
 
Solution
Apr 20, 2018
4
0
10


That's it then, guess I've doomed my GPU in core.
Yet, I updated GPUtw from 1.4 to 1.6, it now limits me to +92MHz core freq :/, but, I can now go up to 8700MHz memory clock which \afaik is the weakness of GeForce compared to Radeon.
Still dunno why the range is reduced from +132MHz to +92MHz, and I'm in no terms commited to enable OCRE, so I hope I can get at least the old performance from the new configurations.
P.S.: I recently bought a DeepCool Z9, should I replace my VGA stock t.paste with it (disregarding the fact that I will be dumping my warranty which is probably already void because of overvoltage damage)? and a little bit off-topic: should I replace my AIO's (CM ML240 RGB) stock t.paste (MasterGel) with that Z9?
Thanks to you all.
 

7664stefan

Honorable
Jul 18, 2013
355
0
10,960
Please do not replace thermal past but keep your warranty. OC damages are hard to proof. You usually would set back all to default values when sending a card for RMA. The manufacturer will only accept RMA if the stock values can no longer be achieved as there is no guarantee for OC.