The setups will be identical except for Chipset and Case factor...This will be primarily for gaming..on a 34” curved 120hz monitor possibly dual monitors at a later date as Well as VR.
The 8700k is :
Aurora R7 8700K (6-Core/12-Thread, 12MB 1 Cache, up to 4.7GHz
Windows 10 Home 64bit English
1 850W EPA Bronze PSU Liquid Cooled Chassis
1 NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GTX 1080 Ti with 11GB GDDR5X (Room for running dual Ti’s)
1 32GB Dual Channel HyperX DDR4 XMP at 2933MHz
1 256GB M.2 PCIe Solid State Drive
1 2TB 7200RPM SATA 6Gb/s (Storage)
1 Tray load DVD Drive (Reads and Writes to DVD/CD)
1 Killer 1535 802.11ac 2x2 WiFi and Bluetooth 4.2
Vs
Area 51 running Ryzen 1900X same equipment otherwise.
I understand the 8700K should be faster
My thoughts are the case is in the Area 51 is huge for expansion w/ up to 4 Video cards....more hard drive space ect...
What I’m losing in speed may be made up later if I go with the Area 51 or stay w tth the smaller case...trying to think ahead....
Thanks
The 8700k is :
Aurora R7 8700K (6-Core/12-Thread, 12MB 1 Cache, up to 4.7GHz
Windows 10 Home 64bit English
1 850W EPA Bronze PSU Liquid Cooled Chassis
1 NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GTX 1080 Ti with 11GB GDDR5X (Room for running dual Ti’s)
1 32GB Dual Channel HyperX DDR4 XMP at 2933MHz
1 256GB M.2 PCIe Solid State Drive
1 2TB 7200RPM SATA 6Gb/s (Storage)
1 Tray load DVD Drive (Reads and Writes to DVD/CD)
1 Killer 1535 802.11ac 2x2 WiFi and Bluetooth 4.2
Vs
Area 51 running Ryzen 1900X same equipment otherwise.
I understand the 8700K should be faster
My thoughts are the case is in the Area 51 is huge for expansion w/ up to 4 Video cards....more hard drive space ect...
What I’m losing in speed may be made up later if I go with the Area 51 or stay w tth the smaller case...trying to think ahead....
Thanks