What GPU should I choose for my old CPU?

Jun 26, 2018
2
0
10
I have a first generation Intel i7 processor, an AMD HD 5500 video card, and a 600W PSU.

I would like to upgrade my video card as I can't even play low end FPS games with a decent frame rate.

What GPU should I choose?

I was thinking about the:
- GTX 960
- GTX 1050ti

Would the 1050ti bottle neck due to the old CPU?

My budget is about $150.

Thanks in advance!
 
Solution

This is not really all that accurate. Both graphics cards offer a relatively similar level of performance, with the 1050 Ti being only a little faster, so any "bottlenecking" would be fairly similar for either card. If the prices of the two are about the same where you are, I would go for the 1050 Ti, as it is not only a bit faster on average, but also has double the VRAM, which could help performance in some newer games. It also requires significantly less power under load compared to a 960, and in turn should put out less heat. Another option would be a regular 1050, which is only slightly slower than a 960, and has...
Jun 26, 2018
2
0
10
Okay!

I feel like the 1050ti is more future proof (when I decide to upgrade my CPU or PC), but I don't know if it's gonna be a problem if start using a 1050ti now.

Will bottlenecking damage my PC? Or does it just mean that it'll perform worse than on other setups?

Final question: will the 1050ti will perform worse than the 960, in my case?
 

avalon096

Commendable
Feb 1, 2017
249
0
1,710
U can get a 1050 if you want now it's fine no problems will occur... It's just that your gaming experience will be a little bad... But if you want get the 1050 now and upgrade later it's fine... Go for it
 

This is not really all that accurate. Both graphics cards offer a relatively similar level of performance, with the 1050 Ti being only a little faster, so any "bottlenecking" would be fairly similar for either card. If the prices of the two are about the same where you are, I would go for the 1050 Ti, as it is not only a bit faster on average, but also has double the VRAM, which could help performance in some newer games. It also requires significantly less power under load compared to a 960, and in turn should put out less heat. Another option would be a regular 1050, which is only slightly slower than a 960, and has 2GB of VRAM, but might potentially cost less.

As for "bottlenecking", the term only refers to one piece of hardware limiting the maximum performance of another. In your case, there will likely be some games that utilize all the available performance of one or more of your CPU's cores, and the graphics card will need to wait for the CPU to complete its processing each frame. Aside from holding back your frame rates in the game, this shouldn't really be a problem. If the CPU can only process the game's routines at a rate of 40fps at a particular point, it won't matter whether you have a 1050 or a 1080, either way you're not going to get more than 40fps at that point. So, you certainly wouldn't want to spend a ton on high-end card, but cards at this performance level probably won't be limited too badly. If the CPU is limiting performance in a particular game, you might not be able to get higher frame rates, but you can always put that underutilized graphics card performance toward turning up the graphics options for better visuals without affecting the frame rate too much.

Edit: One other thing to note though, is that if you have an older monitor that requires an analog VGA cable connection, those are no longer natively supported by the 10-series cards, and you would need an active adapter to hook one up, which can be found for around $10 on sites like Amazon. If your monitor supports a digital connection like HDMI, DVI-D or DisplayPort, that shouldn't be a problem though.
 
Solution