- Jan 29, 2001
- 8,713
- 4
- 31,815
Every now and then, I update my Ryzen spreadsheet for Bang per Buck comparisons (personal curiosity).
The past couple of times, I've noticed that the Ryzen 3 2200G is out-pacing the Ryzen 5 2400G in one of the benchmarks (the second image):
Is this a benchmarking issue, or do APUs inherently create 'dodgy' benchmarks, given that we can't know which processors are using integrated or dedicated gfx in the tests?
Just curious as to the likely causes of this. btw, the 'Bang per Buck' is just a number based on perf vs price. Nothing worth quantifying beyond that. I find it handy to see who's up and down. Oh, and prices are UK GBP, and are the lowest from my own selected vendors, based on personal experience.
The past couple of times, I've noticed that the Ryzen 3 2200G is out-pacing the Ryzen 5 2400G in one of the benchmarks (the second image):
Is this a benchmarking issue, or do APUs inherently create 'dodgy' benchmarks, given that we can't know which processors are using integrated or dedicated gfx in the tests?
Just curious as to the likely causes of this. btw, the 'Bang per Buck' is just a number based on perf vs price. Nothing worth quantifying beyond that. I find it handy to see who's up and down. Oh, and prices are UK GBP, and are the lowest from my own selected vendors, based on personal experience.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram