Sweet jesus, I'm still not 100% sure upgrading from the 2500K was even worth it. The immense overclock-ability of it makes it's Cinebench score match todays cpus.
I have a choice to give my brother a 2500K or a R3 1200. I picked the 1200 for it being new. But when I seen its low Cinebench score while OCed, The 2500K beats it.
I documented this Cinebench years ago:
5 GHZ, 1.43 Volts 651 Multi, 172 Single
4.5 GHZ, 1.38 Volts 580 Multi
I know I hit 5.5 GHZ and beyond on this thing before.
My 2500K bottlenecked 5850's in crossfire
5820K bottlenecked Radeon Pro Duo
Does anyone think a R3 1200 OCed to 3.8 GHZ will bottleneck a 1070?
Sorry for the ramble, just the 2500K's score throws off my decision making.
I have a choice to give my brother a 2500K or a R3 1200. I picked the 1200 for it being new. But when I seen its low Cinebench score while OCed, The 2500K beats it.
I documented this Cinebench years ago:
5 GHZ, 1.43 Volts 651 Multi, 172 Single
4.5 GHZ, 1.38 Volts 580 Multi
I know I hit 5.5 GHZ and beyond on this thing before.
My 2500K bottlenecked 5850's in crossfire
5820K bottlenecked Radeon Pro Duo
Does anyone think a R3 1200 OCed to 3.8 GHZ will bottleneck a 1070?
Sorry for the ramble, just the 2500K's score throws off my decision making.