GTX 1060 very low FPS. CPU limiting?

chw101988

Commendable
Oct 9, 2018
3
0
1,510
Hello.

I have recently bought a Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB Windforce GPU to replace my GTX 570, that wasn't putting up to the latest releases, even on the lowest settings.

Turns out things haven't improved as expected.
With the GTX 570 I was able to play Far Cry 5 on low settings at 720p smoothly. Assassin's Creed Origins would run on lowest settings at 720p with lots of stuttering (so, roughly unplayable), and I was unable to play Madden 19, as it would run at like 5 fps and eventually crash, even on lowest settings and 720p.

With the GTX 1060 I can play Far Cry 5 on ultra settings with 60 fps avarage, 60-70% avg. CPU usage and 70-80% avg. GPU usage. Assassin's Creed Origins runs at very high settings at 40 fps avarage, 90-100% avg. CPU usage and 70-80% avg. GPU usage, with the ocasional stutter, I suppose lowering the settings a little would probably fix it.
Madden 19, though, didn't seem to have improved. CPU load is constantly at 100%, GPU load stays around 20%, and FPS avarages at like 10! Way unplayable.

So I wonder if someone knows why that happens. Is it the CPU that is limiting the FPS, especially on Madden 19, since GPU load stays at around 20%?

My rig is not new, nor that great, but I really thought a GPU improvement would make recent games playable, and not that I'd get 10 fps on Madden 19. Here are the specs:

MoBo: Gigabyte GA 990-FXA UD3
CPU: AMD FX-6100, 3.3 GHz
Cooler: Corsair AirSeries A70
RAM: Corsair Vengence DDR3 2x4GB at 1866Mhz
Power Supply: Corsair 700W

Apreciate the help.
 

chw101988

Commendable
Oct 9, 2018
3
0
1,510


That's what I was afraid of. Didn't wish to spend much money.
Any chance of improvement with a CPU overclock?
If not, you think any AM3+ CPU could make it, so I don't have to buy a new MB and RAM too?
 
OC probably wouldnt do much, and any AM3+ processor wouldnt be a massive improvement.
If you are on a strict budget, see if you can get an 8320 cheap, and I mean very cheap.
Other than that, a move to Ryzen or 8th/9th gen intel would be a much bigger improvement.
 

chw101988

Commendable
Oct 9, 2018
3
0
1,510


Ok, thanks for the help!
 
I happen to have that motherboard with the 4-core 3.6GHz CPU. I tested going from a 660Ti to a 1060, and there was only a slight improvement (though it was a useful increase, it wasn't huge). I think that Windows performance index thing called it around 7.3 with the 660Ti. With a 1060 the test score went to 7.5. Then I was given a free Titan Xp...Windows couldn't even tell the difference on its score. I did get more solid gaming frame rates, but it wasn't all that noticeable.

One thing I discovered is that the PCIe bus on that board is operating at only gen. 1 speeds (2.5GT/s). The board should support gen. 2 (5GT/s), but I have never found any PCIe card which actually reaches gen. 2 on this motherboard. The motherboard seems to have issues no matter what PCIe card is connected.

I would not plan on reusing this board if I were you. You need a bus which actually reaches at least PCIe gen. 2. Many video cards can't reach gen. 3 (they were not designed for this), but most everything is designed to reach gen. 2. I don't think going from gen. 2 to gen. 3 would actually make a big difference (the very newest generation of video cards might see a difference), but slowing to gen. 1 is an extreme handicap.

I am reminded of a book about [strike]motherboards[/strike]...I mean fiction...the quote is something like this:
"Abandon all hope ye who enter..."