AMD X4 9850BE(2.5GHZ) VS Intel QUAD Q9650(3.0GHZ) FLOPS and faster?

Computer performance which anyone finds out easyly to FLOPS


We will try for the world first time the measure x86 CPU performance with the flops
to be important performance index




nowadays, we are usually using CPU CLOCK, FSB, CACHE,MULTI Core to evaluate the CPU performance.
however, it is too difficult for general people to understand the performance measurement process.




There is interesting situation to debate yet Intel Pentium4 3.0GHZ faster
than the AMD Brisbane 4200+(2.2GHZ)


As you can see upside's situation, I guess the CLOCK markting of CPU companies is one of the reason of misunderstanding.


in other words, almost everyone think CPU performance is same as CPU Clock.


The fixed idea to be the performance of the computer came into being a CPU clock at the consciousness of people due to this.




however, nowadays a multicore is going to be a general trend of computer industries.


So I think there is some Problem to evaluate computer speed using past criterion.



On this point of view, I suggest CPU performance measurement method using genuine FLOPS(FPU)


this method could be evaluate CPU speed or entire Platform performance or objective performance




To evaluate to the flops for the X86 CPU to genuine is the text
to be produced to the beginning of the world


Therefore it cost the much a time and agony and effort in gathering the data
and concentrated on finding a objective performance of flops(FPU)


The writer presents to the wolrd company official
at the performance of the x86 CPU general computer let's introduce genuine flops numerical value and
this presents also we are the criteria of new world standard

IF GRAPH EXPANDED THEN MOUSE CLICK , OK???






then How can we evaluate the FLOPS performance?

Linpack,Dhrystone,Whetstone and etc was written in fpu or alu measurement method at the past but
FPU measurement numerical value rose like the superpi to a compiler improvement at these days

As a result SPEC,AIM,Khornerstone,ETC have been written in
FPU or ALU measurement method in modern stage.




the FLOPS performance is the floating point operation speed and i think it is the fundermental parameter of computer speed.


Also, FPU or FLOPS a performance measurement method is used obviously at the reference
point to measure the performance of the million dollar supercomputer normally
and and FPU has important meaning to measure the performance of modern stage computer


if you see the table 1, someone could be confused


An Intel's superpi(benchmark fpu) is far faster than AMD but
AMD's real fpu perfomance is far faster than Intel


It is due to the cheating as the Intel makes the core2duo conroe CPU currently
at the superpi program with the compiler.

in other words The compiler of the superpi is intentively optimized to Intel conroe CPU




Linpack,Dhrystone,Whetstone and etc had used in FPU or ALU measurement method at the past



however, thesedays FPU measurement numerical value has been risen using a compiler
improvement like as superpi.



As a result SPEC,AIM,Khornerstone,ETC have been used in FPU or ALU measurement method in modern stage.

FPU performance important reason

FPU performance makes big influence at Online game,CD package game , rendering ,
Movie working, Encoding , Graphic works,3D rendering, 3D WORKS, UCC contents
works,Photoworks, 3D MAX, Transcoding which the generally users worked


It is also because FPU performance makes big influence at most task of Movie CG working,
Rendering Works,Climate Change , Encoding , 3D Simulation ,Sea Research,Earth Science,
Astrophysics ,Particle Physics ,Plasma Physics ,Nano Science ,Materia Technology ,
Biotechnology ,Protein kinetics ,Molecule dynamics ,Thermodynamics ,
Energy control ,Medical science,Architecture Simulation ,Numerical Analysis ,
Mathematics works , Data Analysis industry whole

Nette Dissertation, leider in einer technischen-abkürzungslastigen Sprache die im ENdeffekt nur Leute verstehen die sowieso wissen dass ein P4 3,2 GHz nicht schneller ist als ein Phenom 2,4GHz.

Quod erat demonstrandum? - Nihil!

'IF GRAPH EXPANDED THEN MOUSE CLICK , OK???' ---> I break together, I make it not more longer with.

Sorry guys, aber AMD hat etwas mehr Würde verdient.

Sicher. Nur wird Otto Normaluser nicht den ganzen Tag Zippen oder Rendern. Das ist alles ein klein wenig einseitig betrachtet. Nicht dass ein Phenom schlecht wäre, nur unterm Strich zählt das Gesamtpaket und nicht nur eine Disziplin. Das ist wie beim Zehnkampf

Ich bin Ganz zufrieden mit mein Phenom 9850 BE. bei spielen ist es doch eh egal welchen CPU man hat also ob einen Intel oder einen AMD. Intel ist eher was für Overclocker und 3D Mark06 Jäger. Aber bei spielen ist es egal ob Phenom oder Q6xxx. oder QX9xxx.