Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 7 > WIN 7 question
Word :    Username :           
 

For those running this OS, how much RAM are you using to run it? How is the PC running with that amount of RAM?

Also, what is the minimum HW requirement of RAM for this OS?

thx

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

It isn't out yet, so there aren't really any official requirements. That being said, I wouldn't really try to run it with less than 2GB, given the cost of memory right now, and 4GB is probably better.

Reply to cjl
Show message
- 0 +

I'm guessing the minimum is going to be 1 gb with 2 gb recommended --- although they claim that the ram "footprint" will be less than that of vista, you really can't tell until they finalize what features will be included

 

Right now, win7 is just a rework of the vista core --- no one will really know anything until both the "core" and "features" are completed and finalized.

 

Are you just curious? Every system selling today should meet the requirements (well maybe not if they are preinstalled with V - basic)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by bc4 on 11-22-2008 at 07:53:43 PM
Reply to bc4

Well, if I have 2GB of RAM, do you think I will be OK when and if I install WIN 7?

thx

Reply to bruinator

Supposed to use memory better than Vista, but who knows.
It has not been released yet. People are running the beta version, but at this point it is not complete enough, it would be pure speculation.

Reply to jitpublisher

bruinator wrote :

Well, if I have 2GB of RAM, do you think I will be OK when and if I install WIN 7?

thx


Yes. Two gig is fine on Vista so it should be as least as good on 7, but to be sure we just have to wait.

Reply to notherdude

jitpublisher wrote :

Supposed to use memory better than Vista, but who knows.
It has not been released yet. People are running the beta version, but at this point it is not complete enough, it would be pure speculation.



To be accurate, I believe those that have Win 7 are running a preBeta (alpha) version - was a very limited, selective release. I understand it got out on the bittorrents, though. But, I think Beta 1 is yet to come.

------------------------------
The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. - HST

Reply to Jake_Barnes

Jake_Barnes wrote :

To be accurate, I believe those that have Win 7 are running a preBeta (alpha) version - was a very limited, selective release. I understand it got out on the bittorrents, though. But, I think Beta 1 is yet to come.


Very true. All that is out is the pre-beta, not the beta.

Reply to notherdude

bc4 wrote :

Are you just curious? Every system selling today should meet the requirements (well maybe not if they are preinstalled with V - basic)



What about the companies like mine that still run a 2.5 Pentium 4, 1 GB RAM, and a ATI 7500? Thats why M$ can't sell their OS's; the companies which normally upgrade first won't spend the money on new PC's, on top of the licenses needed, when their old ones already run the programs they need.

Reply to gamerk316

That's why people have so many issues with Vista - You don't run software on hardware that can't take the heat. If you know your hardware can't run it, don't put new software on it and then say the software sucks. Most new PCs will be able to run 7 fine.

As for your company, though - your hardware is archaic by today's standards. I'm sure it works fine for what you do, and that's fine to keep it. However, if you're going to spend time upgrading OSs, I would highly recommend you spend time upgrading your hardware, too, or else you won't see any kind of boost of anything at all. If you don't need to upgrade, why are you thinking about it?

If you find you want to be more productive or get a feature for new software, you're going to have to have the infrastructure to use it.

Reply to frozenlead

bruinator wrote :

no other opinions? C'mpn guys.


I would say Win 7 is gonna use 1.21 Jigabytes of memory.

Reply to timaahhh

Not only that, you're looking at a rediculous amount of trouble if any of your systems start to go down. You arent going to start finding parts like that laying around and frys. If you've got your own in house technical support, you're not likely to have the distributors specifically just for legacy PC parts to repair with. And if you dont have your technical support on your payroll, you're going to pay out the ass for legacy parts from the corperate IT companies that do have those distros.
That, coupled with the costs of IT wages both In House or Outsourced is going to bring a whole lot of trouble you dont need when trying to do other important things. Like keeping a company above the red in a financial crysis, or figuring out what to eat for lunch. But hey, time is money right?

Reply to Curnel_D

As for windows 7, I cant see it using much more memory than vista. Vista doesnt use that much memory anyways, and performs just fine when under the recomended hardware requirements. (Unless you are just looking at the task manager memory target. Then you're always going to be dissapointed since Vista, and likely windows 7 will set aside a portion of your ram for programs that might use it. And it also shares this portion. So likely what you think is ram hogging is actually helping to keep your computer just a tad more snappy.)

Reply to Curnel_D

Win 7 is supposed to be lighter than Vista with a stripped down kernel. New graphics and GUI features would put some weight on it so... I say it will be faster than Vista, might be slower than XP. If you have something that can run Vista aero, it should be fine :)

Reply to amdfangirl

Win 7 is just an optimization of the Vista code, which MS will mess up with more bloat that is not in Vista. Win 7 runs ok right now with 2gb ram.
I think where you will see the biggest difference is on systems with the memory controller on the cpu.

Reply to bobbknight

Optimisation normally means better ;)

Reply to amdfangirl

I tried the Pre beta on my x58/i7 rig and it wouldnt let me load my mobo drivers. One thing i did notice in the 10 mins i looked at it was the vista index score goes up to atleast 7.5 maybe higher.

I think windows seven is SP2/SP3 all in one, but M$ would rather call it new and charge another $400 instead of giving it free.

Reply to roadrunner197069

Not necessarily true. Although, I see what your saying. It's not finished and it might get a new file system that I've read about. Now if you said, they ripped off people because this is what Vista should have been, then I'd fully agree.

Reply to habitat87

When it comes out through MSDNAA, I'll get it. I just hope I'm not finished university by then. M$ charge Joe Idiot lots so us students can get it free.

Reply to randomizer

Grab me a copy too ;)

Reply to amdfangirl

^+1.

Where have you been AFG?

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793

Bill foretold that it would only need 640kb so I'm shaving the extra chip off my old 72-pin.

Reply to woshitudou

Shadow703793 wrote :

^+1.

Where have you been AFG?



Down in the lesser forums

Reply to amdfangirl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 7 > WIN 7 question
Go to:

There are 1095 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them