• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

News

ATI Catalyst Drivers v4.8

ATI has released a new Catalyst driver for ATI based graphic cards: Read more

Physics Drivers Outrage: Nvidia Guilty?

Opinion - When we published an article detailing Nvidia’s advantage in 3DMark Vantage, we had a good feeling that data might spark some controversy. Using GPU for physics calculation in a CPU benchmark highly suspicious thing in any way you look at it. A Read more

PC Gaming Roundup - February 19, 2009

Here's today's gaming goodness roundup, starting with news on the Unreal tournament 3 titan Pack, Dawn of War II and Atlantica Online. Read more

Forget DVI, HDMI; USB Displays Coming

We look at DisplayLink, a USB-based multi-monitor solution. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard drive capacities have increased in large increments over the last few years, while trends indicate reduced spindle speeds of 5,400 RPM instead of 7,200. We looked at three generations of Samsung hard drives to analyze the performance ramifications. Read more

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

This month, ATI's new Radeon HD 4770 is missing in action, since online stores are not only unable to keep it in stock, but also de-listing it completely. With violent movements in pricing, though, it'd have been taken off the recommended list anyway. Read more

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Nvidia's Ion for the do-it-yourselfer launched last month in the form of Zotac's mini-ITX motherboard. Though sexy in principle, the platform had some teething pains right out of the gate. Chris Angelini revisits those issues and uses Ion as a real HTPC. Read more

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Do you want a quick Core i7 system, but don’t feel confident sticking to Intel's spec and using the DDR3-1066 memory supported by the processor? We benchmark the most relevant memory speed and timing combinations to check the benefit of going faster. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > unreal tournament 3 low(er) framerate than expected

unreal tournament 3 low(er) framerate than expected

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I played Unreal tournament 3 and continuously dipped down into the 40's for my framerate even though I've read of how so many people are getting such smooth framerate on "older" systems. I'm not that concerned about playing at ultra high resolutions/gfx settings, but am more concerned with a framerate higher than 60 at ALL times. I would have thought that my sys would be able to do this, but I might be wrong.

Is this game extremely bottlenecked by the the processor, or is there a setting in the game I can adjust to minimize cpu calculations like there is for minimizing calculations on the video card.

by the way, I have tried lower resolutions and min gfx settings, but framerates have not increased.

sys spec
3800+ x2 @ 2.7 Ghz
evga 8800gt superclocked
2x1gb kingston ddr2 667

I also have a laptop with a core 2 duo t7500 2.2ghz with a mobile nvs 135 (equivalent to 8400m gs) in it. I've tried playing the game at like 320 by 240 resolution at the lowest gfx setting and this game runs the cpu up to 100% as well. as long as it stays below 100%, I can get 60+ fps. I would have thought a 2.2 GHz core 2 duo would have been plenty for this game (even though it is a mobile proc)

any thoughts on how to improve my framerate other than upgrading?





Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

anybody want to make any comments

Reply to sepayne21

sepayne21 wrote :

I played Unreal tournament 3 and continuously dipped down into the 40's for my framerate even though I've read of how so many people are getting such smooth framerate on "older" systems. I'm not that concerned about playing at ultra high resolutions/gfx settings, but am more concerned with a framerate higher than 60 at ALL times. I would have thought that my sys would be able to do this, but I might be wrong.

 

Is this game extremely bottlenecked by the the processor, or is there a setting in the game I can adjust to minimize cpu calculations like there is for minimizing calculations on the video card.

 

by the way, I have tried lower resolutions and min gfx settings, but framerates have not increased.

 

sys spec
3800+ x2 @ 2.7 Ghz
evga 8800gt superclocked
2x1gb kingston ddr2 667

 

I also have a laptop with a core 2 duo t7500 2.2ghz with a mobile nvs 135 (equivalent to 8400m gs) in it. I've tried playing the game at like 320 by 240 resolution at the lowest gfx setting and this game runs the cpu up to 100% as well. as long as it stays below 100%, I can get 60+ fps. I would have thought a 2.2 GHz core 2 duo would have been plenty for this game (even though it is a mobile proc)

 

any thoughts on how to improve my framerate other than upgrading?


UT3 ran on my system and kept a framerate always over 60 when playing at 1680x1050 on the highest in game settings, and my CPU is nearly identical to yours. I do own the PhysX card, but I doubt that makes any difference as we all know it was just a gimmick.


Message edited by Heyyou27 on 08-25-2008 at 02:46:06 AM
Reply to Heyyou27

I have simular spec.s with my computer. I was averaging 20 frames per second until I changed my Virus protection provider from AVG free to Avast free. I now average almost 60 frames per second with 1920 by 1200 resolution and a 8800gts 512mb/5600+/4 gigs ram....

Reply to friendlysmith

inspector71 wrote :

Try 2 more gigs of ram......

Unless he's running Vista, 2GB should be more than enough for UT3.

Reply to Heyyou27
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > unreal tournament 3 low(er) framerate than expected
Go to:

There are 399 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links