JeanLuc :
The PS3 is having a hard time competing against the Xbox and Wii at the moment, so much so last month the 360 out sold the PS3 in Japan (which is quite an accomplishment considering how tough it is for foreign products to succeed in Japan).
The types of games you like are better suited for the PC because of the control systems (unless you actually like playing FPS’s with a joypad), plus there’s the mod scene, online play, Lan and general PC gaming community which is something the PS3 is only just breaking into.
I don’t mean to sound overlay negative towards the PS3, but there are still a lot of issues with the console two f which are quite important, 1) Price and 2) Quality of games. Also the lack of exclusives (this applies to all consoles as well as PC’s) is a bit concerning. If you did want to get a console I would get the Wii, as most console games are released on the PC anyway and look and play better.
Wouldn't you upgrade parts cost less then a PS3 anyway?
While it was impressive to see the 360 outsell the PS3 in Japan at all, it was from a weekly sales chart published by Gamasutra, not monthly, so the PS3 is still more likely to outsell the Xbox360 in Japan for the month of August. According to the NPD the PS3 has outsold the 360 every month so far in 2008, and the PS3 has already beat the 360's lifetime sales in Europe despite the fact that the 360 came out December 2, 2005 and the PS3 was launched in Europe March 23, 2007.
First person shooters definitely control best on the PC with a mouse and keyboard, but some console shooters have shown it can be done quite well. Lan is a hit and miss for me; on the one hand, lan parties kick ass if you can go to them enough, but it can be a hassle moving all of the equipment. Consoles have been getting better with lan as well; Warhawk on the PS3 offers up to 4 players per console for lan, as does Halo 3 on the Xbox360 and it's a very easy setup.
Owning all 3 consoles, I'd say the Wii is the one I'm least likely to recommend. Sure, Wii Sports is fun, but there aren't that many titles really worth playing, and the system is so dated on a technical level in comparison to the Xbox360 and PS3.
The exclusive argument is a bit silly; not only does it appear that the PS3 has more big name exclusives coming out in 2008 & 2009, but most of the "exclusives" on the 360 end up on the PC anyways, not that it really matters.
Cost is an issue; OP, how much are you going to spend upgrading your PC?
organix :
PC gear advances at a much faster rate than consoles, which for me is the greatest strength of the consoles ... you won't have to update your hardware every year.
This, and the fact that there haven't really been any good PC exclusives this year are driving me away from the platform. I'd get rid of my 8800GTX and upgrade to the GTX 280 or a 4870X2 if there were new titles worth playing on the PC that weren't coming out on anything else.
ovaltineplease :
The types of games you like are better suited for the PC because of the control systems (unless you actually like playing FPS’s with a joypad)
Given that over half of the online community of fps gamers is subverting anticheats to play these games, I don't really think the control style matters
I'd actually go so far to say that if you want to play FPS online, then do it on console instead - because at least you know its a level playing field.
Cheating does happen in console games occasionally, but it is a lot more difficult to do on a closed platform, as well as developers / Microsoft / Sony seem to monitor it a lot more. On the Xbox360, if you get caught cheating they ban your console's serial number from connecting to Xbox Live.