Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > PC Gaming > crysis slow on AMD 6000+

crysis slow on AMD 6000+

Forum Video Games : PC Gaming crysis slow on AMD 6000+

Word :    Username :           
 

i build my pc few month ago. i have AMD x2 6000+ 3.0 Ghz. 4870 video card, A-Data 2x1gb ram ddr2 [5-5-5-18], Antec 650W modular PSU. Biostar TA770A2+ Motherboard, SoundBlaster, midtower case with 2 120mm fans. 640 gb Sata II, 250 gb Sata II. Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

so.. question is: why i can't run crysis on very high? only on medium. i mean ican run it but sometimes it is so slow.. almost like stopping. i hate game when it's not going smoothly. i turned off any AA only trying to go on very high. i run all my other games on very high even with AA all on. i have 1440x900 19" monitor.

thanks

Reply to _orbital_
Register or log in to remove.

Even the GTX 280 can't handle Crysis on Very High at any decent resolution; I think you expected too much out of your 4870, when no card configuration is capable of running Crysis perfectly smooth on Very High with antialiasing, including 3 GTX 280s.

Reply to Heyyou27

I think you're totally wrong ^

Try running it in 32bit not 64bit, make sure you have the latest drivers, turn AA and AF off (maybe driver issues).

What rez do you run it in btw?

------------------------------ E8400, Radeon 4850 512mb, 2GB OCZ 1066mhz DDR2, Asus P5K, 500GB 7200.11, 500w OCZ StealhXStream, Logitech X-550s + Mission Hi-Fi speakers, DVD-doitall drive. Amidoinitrite.
Reply to jonisginger

jonisginger wrote :

I think you're totally wrong ^

Try running it in 32bit not 64bit, make sure you have the latest drivers, turn AA and AF off (maybe driver issues).

What rez do you run it in btw?



well i am running 1440x900 and i turned off all AA and AF. same.. even on medium sometimes it freezes.. not too bad but it does. i played on my old 1950xt on xp pro medium perfectly even high was better than 4870

Reply to _orbital_

Yeah well something is wrong. Turn X64 off, have you got all the latest drivers?

------------------------------ E8400, Radeon 4850 512mb, 2GB OCZ 1066mhz DDR2, Asus P5K, 500GB 7200.11, 500w OCZ StealhXStream, Logitech X-550s + Mission Hi-Fi speakers, DVD-doitall drive. Amidoinitrite.
Reply to jonisginger

I think i can help i have a q6600 with 8800 ultra, running vista 32 bit and 64 bit as well as xp.

wehn running in XP i can run the game in vey high easier because it isnt using direct x 10, which i belive jonisginger must be from the spec of his PC, where as a new build u will be on vista

i find on vista very high on "shader" and "shadows" brings my system down to a crawl of around 15 FPS

i find very lil diffenrce between 64 bit and 32 bit as i have both versions of vista

if i were u id set all to very high and decrease shaders to medium shadows to high and water to medium i find this works well, and just forget AA and AF as no system can run thoses in max happily,

you may find you want slightly lower settings than that as a q6600 OC to 3 Ghz will handle the physics a lil better so u may wana lower the physics options too.

Reply to Anonymous

Oh yeah DX10 will kill it. Forgot about that.

------------------------------ E8400, Radeon 4850 512mb, 2GB OCZ 1066mhz DDR2, Asus P5K, 500GB 7200.11, 500w OCZ StealhXStream, Logitech X-550s + Mission Hi-Fi speakers, DVD-doitall drive. Amidoinitrite.
Reply to jonisginger

Aaaaaaaaand Physics won't be a problem since I have a 6000+ and they run fine in the physics tests

------------------------------ E8400, Radeon 4850 512mb, 2GB OCZ 1066mhz DDR2, Asus P5K, 500GB 7200.11, 500w OCZ StealhXStream, Logitech X-550s + Mission Hi-Fi speakers, DVD-doitall drive. Amidoinitrite.
Reply to jonisginger

Anonymous wrote :

I think i can help i have a q6600 with 8800 ultra, running vista 32 bit and 64 bit as well as xp.

wehn running in XP i can run the game in vey high easier because it isnt using direct x 10, which i belive jonisginger must be from the spec of his PC, where as a new build u will be on vista

i find on vista very high on "shader" and "shadows" brings my system down to a crawl of around 15 FPS

i find very lil diffenrce between 64 bit and 32 bit as i have both versions of vista

if i were u id set all to very high and decrease shaders to medium shadows to high and water to medium i find this works well, and just forget AA and AF as no system can run thoses in max happily,

you may find you want slightly lower settings than that as a q6600 OC to 3 Ghz will handle the physics a lil better so u may wana lower the physics options too.




ok let me try to do that ;]

Reply to _orbital_

Anonymous wrote :

I think i can help i have a q6600 with 8800 ultra, running vista 32 bit and 64 bit as well as xp.

wehn running in XP i can run the game in vey high easier because it isnt using direct x 10, which i belive jonisginger must be from the spec of his PC, where as a new build u will be on vista

i find on vista very high on "shader" and "shadows" brings my system down to a crawl of around 15 FPS

i find very lil diffenrce between 64 bit and 32 bit as i have both versions of vista

if i were u id set all to very high and decrease shaders to medium shadows to high and water to medium i find this works well, and just forget AA and AF as no system can run thoses in max happily,

you may find you want slightly lower settings than that as a q6600 OC to 3 Ghz will handle the physics a lil better so u may wana lower the physics options too.



strange but it helped a little bit ;]

Reply to _orbital_

just try a few lil changes like tha ur GPU may find some things eaiser to do than otheres best is to load Fraps put all settings to low and adjust one part at a time if u notice a major drop in FPS keep that setting lower.

Reply to Anonymous

Anonymous wrote :

just try a few lil changes like tha ur GPU may find some things eaiser to do than otheres best is to load Fraps put all settings to low and adjust one part at a time if u notice a major drop in FPS keep that setting lower.




coool.. thx for info

Reply to _orbital_

If you wanted to play Crysis on max, you shouldn't have gotten a 4870. I have a 4870 and love it, but it is a well known fact that ATI doesn't do as good in Crysis as Nvidia does. I play with everything on high, in xp, and with AA at 2x. Also, i have a Phenom 9850 (i know, not the best choice...).

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by MegaGamer3 on 09-03-2008 at 11:28:46 PM
Reply to MegaGamer3
- 0 +

MegaGamer3 wrote :

If you wanted to play Crysis on max, you shouldn't have gotten a 4870. I have a 4870 and love it, but it is a well known fact that ATI doesn't do as good in Crysis as Nvidia does. I play with everything on high, in xp, and with AA at 2x. Also, i have a Phenom 9850 (i know, not the best choice...).



"NVIDIA: The Way It's Meant to be Playedâ„¢."

Reply to mi1ez
- 0 +

nvidia cards are optimized for this game. crysis runs smooth on my system at 1680x1050,dx10, all very high, 16aa avg 30-35fps. crysis runs much better on 64bit and if u really want to play the game on higher settings, get 4gig of ram and i would recommend another 4870 in cf.

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik

Heya,

Just to second what was already said:

Crysis doesn't play smoothly for MOST people.

This game made everyone mad when it came out because everyone who picked it up with average graphics GPUs pretty much found out they can't play it on any of the nice settings. It's like when Oblivion came out. Folk just had to suffer with lower resolutions and lower settings all around. Crysis is not even that great of a game. It's just such a system strainer that it gets hearlded as "the" game to be able to run. I would not base any of your PC's specs on Crysis.

Anyhow, as others have stated, nVidia cards do run Crysis better. And Crysis is one of those games that absolutely takes great gains from SLI and Crossfire, ie, 2x GPU's working together. You can see simple benchmarks of high resolution dual GPU gaming on very high and AA enabled and it performs at playable frame rates. Even SLI 8800gt's play this game on high settings very easily. For a single card, it's just harder at high res and high settings. At lower res's and medium settings, most of the new cards can play Crysis, but we all know we want it to be as pretty as possible.

Very best,

Reply to malveaux
- 0 +

I think Vista is generally made for Intel Quad Cores and crysis is made for intel cpu's aswell so i skipped everyones posts now dont fire at me ;O! but Crysis isent AMD supported much

Reply to DarkRoy

I run Crysis on high with 4xaa and 2xaf on:

x2 6400
4gigs of ram
8800GT
XFI(frees up alot of cpu in surround sound games over just about any other card out=lots of resources)
Raptors-raid 0

It runs great. Dips to 15 fps near the end of the game but runs flawless the rest of the time at my vsync cap. The above poster is CPU bound. Its pretty typical with those specs. The only cpu from AMD atm is 6400 that will let a 4870 run like it should.

His major problem honestly is his ram. Crysis runs nearly 30% faster on vista 64 while using the 64bit exe. Not using the 64bit client is silly and will hurt your performance. However his system is saturated. His ram is full the second he loads the game. 64 bit vista itself uses more ram after a boot up. 64 bit apps will use more of the ram to run. With less then 4 gigs of ram you are FUBAR trying to game on 64bit vista. Your system will run comparable when gaming to the same rig with xp 32bit and 512 of ram when trying to game but worse.

The Fix:

For now buy another 2 gigs of ram. Run the 64 bit client. The only other thing you can do is wait for a new cpu from amd if you are on an AM2+ MB or convert to Intel. The ram should make your system alot faster. You are literally trying to fit something the size of a car inside of a coffee cup. Ram is cheap and you will be very happy with the results I promise.


Message edited by Jerseygamer on 09-09-2008 at 01:06:46 PM
Reply to Jerseygamer
- 0 +

I get a solid 20fps which in crysis is fairly playable at 1680x1050 all very high with 4xaa, it may be an "nvidia" game but my stock clocked 4870 runs circles around my overclocked 8800GTX in crysis.

Reply to dtq

Hey wow that's exactly what i'm going to build my computer from. Including the monitor i have is a 19 inch widescreen. I'm also interested in Crysis. So AMD 6000+ isn't good at playing Crysis then?

Reply to Nashsafc

Hahaha. And i like what you've done with your piture, amd core qaud lol. So contradicting.


Message edited by Nashsafc on 06-04-2009 at 01:09:43 PM
Reply to Nashsafc

djcoolmasterx wrote :

THE THREAD IS A YEAR OLD




Do you just hop around threads and comment when their a year old? youre everywhere

------------------------------ CPU: Intel Core i7 920 2.66ghz,RAM: Corsair Dominator 6gb 1600mhz, MOBO: Asus p6t deluxe, GPU: Radeon 4870 x2, PSU 1000w corsair, 500gb SATA, CASE: coolermaster HAF 932
Reply to Goodskillz

No i'm not everywhere, i've only been on two threads so far. My own one and this one.

Reply to Nashsafc
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > PC Gaming > crysis slow on AMD 6000+
Go to:

There are 2478 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Gamer Recommendations for Earbuds/IEMs?
By AntiZig, 1 day ago:

Hi, one thing I'm sortof confused about if you already have the headphones that you like...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts